• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

创伤患者的院前生理数据及救生干预措施。

Prehospital physiologic data and lifesaving interventions in trauma patients.

作者信息

Holcomb John B, Niles Sarah E, Miller Charles C, Hinds Denise, Duke James H, Moore Frederick A

机构信息

University of Texas Health Sciences Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA.

出版信息

Mil Med. 2005 Jan;170(1):7-13. doi: 10.7205/milmed.170.1.7.

DOI:10.7205/milmed.170.1.7
PMID:15724847
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The ability to accurately triage trauma patients can be difficult in the prehospital environment. Prehospital trauma scoring systems have been developed with a goal of determining which patients should be transported immediately to a trauma center, thus benefiting from critical personnel and resource-intensive lifesaving interventions (LSIs). A resource-based endpoint, LSIs, therefore might be the optimal endpoint of prehospital triage scoring and could be used to determine where patients are transported. We hypothesized that simple physiologic data available immediately upon scene arrival would prove predictive of the need for a LSI.

METHODS

Trauma patients transported from the injury scene by helicopter were eligible for entry into the study. Prehospital physiologic data and interventions were timed and recorded by flight medical personnel, whereas hospital vital signs, injuries, and interventions were prospectively recorded from the inpatient records. The motor component of the Glasgow Coma Scale was used as an indicator of neurologic function. LSIs were procedures deemed lifesaving by a multidisciplinary panel of trauma experts.

RESULTS

Physiologic data were collected from August 2001 to February 2002. Data were collected for 216 random patients transported by the Life Flight helicopter service. There were no differences between LSI and non-LSI patients in age, gender, or transport time, and 80 patients underwent 197 LSIs. The mean age was 33 +/- 17 years, 73% of patients were male, 90% suffered blunt injury, the injury severity score was 14 +/- 9, hypotension (systolic blood pressure of < 90 mm Hg) was present in 14% of cases, and the mortality rate was 6%. Penetrating injury and increasing injury severity score were associated with LSI. Univariate analysis of the physiologic data immediately available in the field revealed that SBP of < 90 mm Hg, motor score of < 6, delayed capillary refill, and increasing pulse were significantly associated with a LSI. However, multivariate analysis revealed that only SBP of < 90 mm Hg and motor score of < 6 were associated with a LSI. When both variables were abnormal, 95% of patients required a LSI; when both variables were normal, 21% of patients required a LSI.

CONCLUSIONS

The presence of hypotension or decreased motor score was correlated with the need for LSIs. However, normotensive patients with normal motor scores still frequently required LSIs. Optimal discrimination of this group of patients will require new analytic approaches.

摘要

背景

在院前环境中,准确分诊创伤患者可能具有挑战性。院前创伤评分系统的开发旨在确定哪些患者应立即转运至创伤中心,从而受益于关键人员和资源密集型的救生干预措施(LSIs)。因此,基于资源的终点——LSIs可能是院前分诊评分的最佳终点,可用于确定患者的转运地点。我们假设,到达现场后立即获得的简单生理数据可预测是否需要进行LSI。

方法

由直升机从受伤现场转运的创伤患者符合纳入本研究的条件。院前生理数据和干预措施由飞行医务人员记录时间,而医院生命体征、损伤情况和干预措施则从住院记录中前瞻性记录。格拉斯哥昏迷量表的运动部分用作神经功能指标。LSIs是由多学科创伤专家小组认定为救生的程序。

结果

生理数据收集时间为2001年8月至2002年2月。收集了由生命飞行直升机服务转运的216例随机患者的数据。LSI患者和非LSI患者在年龄、性别或转运时间上无差异,80例患者接受了197次LSIs。平均年龄为33±17岁,73%的患者为男性,90%为钝性损伤,损伤严重程度评分为14±9,14%的病例存在低血压(收缩压<90mmHg),死亡率为6%。穿透性损伤和损伤严重程度评分增加与LSI相关。对现场立即可得的生理数据进行单因素分析显示,收缩压<90mmHg、运动评分<6、毛细血管再充盈延迟和脉搏增加与LSI显著相关。然而,多因素分析显示,只有收缩压<90mmHg和运动评分<6与LSI相关。当两个变量均异常时,95%的患者需要进行LSI;当两个变量均正常时,21%的患者需要进行LSI。

结论

低血压或运动评分降低与需要进行LSIs相关。然而,血压正常且运动评分正常的患者仍经常需要进行LSIs。对这组患者进行最佳鉴别将需要新的分析方法。

相似文献

1
Prehospital physiologic data and lifesaving interventions in trauma patients.创伤患者的院前生理数据及救生干预措施。
Mil Med. 2005 Jan;170(1):7-13. doi: 10.7205/milmed.170.1.7.
2
Inefficacy of standard vital signs for predicting mortality and the need for prehospital life-saving interventions in blunt trauma patients transported via helicopter: A repeated call for new measures.标准生命体征对预测通过直升机转运的钝性创伤患者的死亡率及院前救生干预需求的无效性:对新措施的再次呼吁。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2017 Jul;83(1 Suppl 1):S98-S103. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000001482.
3
Manual vital signs reliably predict need for life-saving interventions in trauma patients.手动测量生命体征能够可靠地预测创伤患者对挽救生命干预措施的需求。
J Trauma. 2005 Oct;59(4):821-8; discussion 828-9. doi: 10.1097/01.ta.0000188125.44129.7c.
4
Heart-rate complexity for prediction of prehospital lifesaving interventions in trauma patients.心率复杂性用于预测创伤患者的院前救生干预措施
J Trauma. 2008 Oct;65(4):813-9. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e3181848241.
5
Utility of vital signs, heart rate variability and complexity, and machine learning for identifying the need for lifesaving interventions in trauma patients.生命体征、心率变异性和复杂性以及机器学习在识别创伤患者是否需要进行挽救生命干预方面的效用。
Shock. 2014 Aug;42(2):108-14. doi: 10.1097/SHK.0000000000000186.
6
Is heart period variability associated with the administration of lifesaving interventions in individual prehospital trauma patients with normal standard vital signs?在生命体征正常的个体创伤院前患者中,心脏周期变异性与救命干预的实施是否相关?
Crit Care Med. 2010 Aug;38(8):1666-73. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3181e74cab.
7
Novel prehospital monitor with injury acuity alarm to identify trauma patients who require lifesaving intervention.新型院前监护仪,具有损伤严重程度警报功能,可识别需要进行救生干预的创伤患者。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2014 Mar;76(3):743-9. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000000099.
8
Sample entropy predicts lifesaving interventions in trauma patients with normal vital signs.样本熵可预测生命体征正常的创伤患者的救命干预措施。
J Crit Care. 2015 Aug;30(4):705-10. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2015.03.018. Epub 2015 Mar 21.
9
Trauma system resource preservation: A simple scene triage tool can reduce helicopter emergency medical services overutilization in a state trauma system.创伤系统资源保护:一种简单的现场分诊工具可减少州创伤系统中直升机紧急医疗服务的过度使用。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2019 Aug;87(2):315-321. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000002309.
10
Real-time heart rate entropy predicts the need for lifesaving interventions in trauma activation patients.实时心率熵可预测创伤激活患者救生干预的需求。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2013 Oct;75(4):607-12. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e31829bb991.

引用本文的文献

1
A Machine Learning Trauma Triage Model for Critical Care Transport.一种用于重症监护转运的机器学习创伤分诊模型。
JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Jun 2;8(6):e259639. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.9639.
2
Words to live by: Using medic impressions to identify the need for prehospital lifesaving interventions.生存准则:利用医疗印象识别院前救生干预的需求。
Acad Emerg Med. 2025 May;32(5):516-525. doi: 10.1111/acem.15067. Epub 2025 Jan 24.
3
Prognostic value of capillary refill time in adult patients: a systematic review with meta-analysis.
毛细血管再充盈时间对成人患者预后的预测价值:系统评价与荟萃分析。
Crit Care. 2023 Dec 2;27(1):473. doi: 10.1186/s13054-023-04751-9.
4
Identifying Trauma Patients in Need for Emergency Surgery in the Prehospital Setting: The Prehospital Prediction of In-Hospital Emergency Treatment (PROPHET) Study.在院前环境中识别需要急诊手术的创伤患者:院内急诊治疗的院前预测(PROPHET)研究
J Clin Med. 2023 Oct 20;12(20):6660. doi: 10.3390/jcm12206660.
5
Considering non-hospital data in clinical informatics use cases, a review of the National Emergency Medical Services Information System (NEMSIS).考虑临床信息学用例中的非医院数据,对国家紧急医疗服务信息系统(NEMSIS)的综述。
Inform Med Unlocked. 2022;35. doi: 10.1016/j.imu.2022.101129. Epub 2022 Nov 9.
6
Prehospital shock index outperforms hypotension alone in predicting significant injury in trauma patients.在预测创伤患者的严重损伤方面,院前休克指数比单纯低血压表现更优。
Trauma Surg Acute Care Open. 2021 Apr 13;6(1):e000712. doi: 10.1136/tsaco-2021-000712. eCollection 2021.
7
Predicting cardiorespiratory instability.预测心肺功能不稳定。
Crit Care. 2016 Mar 16;20:70. doi: 10.1186/s13054-016-1223-7.
8
Emergency care of traumatic brain injuries in Pakistan: a multicenter study.巴基斯坦创伤性脑损伤的急诊护理:一项多中心研究。
BMC Emerg Med. 2015;15 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):S12. doi: 10.1186/1471-227X-15-S2-S12. Epub 2015 Dec 11.
9
Functional hemodynamic monitoring.功能性血流动力学监测
Crit Care Clin. 2015 Jan;31(1):89-111. doi: 10.1016/j.ccc.2014.08.005.
10
Evidence-based improvement of the National Trauma Triage Protocol: The Glasgow Coma Scale versus Glasgow Coma Scale motor subscale.基于证据的国家创伤分诊协议改进:格拉斯哥昏迷评分与格拉斯哥昏迷评分运动子量表。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2014 Jul;77(1):95-102; discussion 101-2. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000000280.