• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

阿芬太尼、瑞芬太尼以及与咪达唑仑联合使用用于儿童骨髓穿刺术的安全有效的镇静和镇痛。

Safe and effective sedation and analgesia for bone marrow aspiration procedures in children with alfentanil, remifentanil and combinations with midazolam.

作者信息

Antmen Bülent, Saşmaz Ilgen, Birbiçer Handan, Ozbek Hayri, Burgut Refik, Işik Geylan, Kilinç Yurdanur

机构信息

Department of Pediatric Hematology, Cukurova University, Faculty of Medicine, Turkey.

出版信息

Paediatr Anaesth. 2005 Mar;15(3):214-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9592.2004.01411.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.1460-9592.2004.01411.x
PMID:15725319
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Invasive procedures such as bone marrow aspiration in children may be painful and cause anxiety. We investigated the efficacy and safety of remifentanil (R) alfentanil (A), remifentanil-midazolam (RM), and alfentanil-midazolam (AM) combinations in providing analgesia and sedation for bone marrow aspiration.

METHODS

Eighty children undergoing a diagnostic bone marrow aspiration whose ages ranged from 5-16 years (mean 9.20 +/- 3.00 years) were enrolled in this study. The patients were randomly assigned to one of 4 treatment groups. Vital signs, sedation and pain scores, somatic responses (sweating and tears) were recorded before, during bone marrow aspiration and after 5 and 15 min of the procedure.

RESULTS

There were no statistical differences between sedation and the CHEOPS scores of the four groups during and after the procedures. The VAS scores were significantly higher for group A compared with groups R and RM during the procedure (P < 0.008). There were no differences between the VAS scores in group AM compared with groups R and RM (P > 0.008). There were also no statistical differences among the VAS scores of four groups after the procedure (P > 0.008). All patients had adequate sedation and analgesia. None of the patients in the study had deep sedation, hypotension, bradycardia, hypoxemia, or respiratory depression.

CONCLUSIONS

Remifentanil, alfentanil, remifentanil-midazolam, and alfentanil-midazolam combinations are effective in children and can be used safely in bone marrow aspiration which is a brief but painful procedure performed in the pediatric patient group.

摘要

背景

诸如儿童骨髓穿刺等侵入性操作可能会引起疼痛并导致焦虑。我们研究了瑞芬太尼(R)、阿芬太尼(A)、瑞芬太尼 - 咪达唑仑(RM)和阿芬太尼 - 咪达唑仑(AM)联合用药在为骨髓穿刺提供镇痛和镇静方面的疗效和安全性。

方法

本研究纳入了80名年龄在5至16岁(平均9.20±3.00岁)接受诊断性骨髓穿刺的儿童。患者被随机分配到4个治疗组之一。在骨髓穿刺前、穿刺过程中以及穿刺后5分钟和15分钟记录生命体征、镇静和疼痛评分、躯体反应(出汗和流泪)。

结果

在操作过程中和操作后,四组的镇静和CHEOPS评分之间无统计学差异。在操作过程中,A组的VAS评分显著高于R组和RM组(P < 0.008)。AM组与R组和RM组的VAS评分之间无差异(P > 0.008)。操作后四组的VAS评分之间也无统计学差异(P > 0.008)。所有患者均有足够的镇静和镇痛效果。研究中没有患者出现深度镇静、低血压、心动过缓、低氧血症或呼吸抑制。

结论

瑞芬太尼、阿芬太尼、瑞芬太尼 - 咪达唑仑和阿芬太尼 - 咪达唑仑联合用药对儿童有效,可安全用于骨髓穿刺,骨髓穿刺是在儿科患者群体中进行的一种短暂但痛苦的操作。

相似文献

1
Safe and effective sedation and analgesia for bone marrow aspiration procedures in children with alfentanil, remifentanil and combinations with midazolam.阿芬太尼、瑞芬太尼以及与咪达唑仑联合使用用于儿童骨髓穿刺术的安全有效的镇静和镇痛。
Paediatr Anaesth. 2005 Mar;15(3):214-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9592.2004.01411.x.
2
Can remifentanil be a better choice than propofol for colonoscopy during monitored anesthesia care?在麻醉监护下进行结肠镜检查时,瑞芬太尼会比丙泊酚是更好的选择吗?
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2006 Jul;50(6):736-41. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.2006.01047.x.
3
Patient-controlled sedation for colonoscopy: a randomized trial comparing patient-controlled administration of propofol and alfentanil with physician-administered midazolam and pethidine.结肠镜检查的患者自控镇静:一项随机试验,比较丙泊酚和阿芬太尼的患者自控给药与医生给予的咪达唑仑和哌替啶。
Endoscopy. 2003 Aug;35(8):683-7. doi: 10.1055/s-2003-41519.
4
Remifentanil vs. meperidine for patient-controlled analgesia during colonoscopy: a randomized double-blind trial.瑞芬太尼与哌替啶用于结肠镜检查期间患者自控镇痛的随机双盲试验
Am J Gastroenterol. 2009 May;104(5):1119-24. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2009.53. Epub 2009 Mar 31.
5
Hypnosis as adjunct therapy in conscious sedation for plastic surgery.催眠作为整形外科清醒镇静中的辅助治疗方法。
Reg Anesth. 1995 Mar-Apr;20(2):145-51.
6
Painful procedures in children with cancer: comparison of moderate sedation and general anesthesia for lumbar puncture and bone marrow aspiration.癌症患儿的疼痛性操作:腰椎穿刺和骨髓穿刺中中度镇静与全身麻醉的比较
Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2005 Dec;45(7):933-8. doi: 10.1002/pbc.20567.
7
Safe and efficacious use of procedural sedation and analgesia by nonanesthesiologists in a pediatric emergency department.非麻醉医生在儿科急诊科安全有效地使用程序性镇静和镇痛。
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2003 Nov;157(11):1090-6. doi: 10.1001/archpedi.157.11.1090.
8
Safer colonoscopy with patient-controlled analgesia and sedation with propofol and alfentanil.采用丙泊酚和阿芬太尼患者自控镇痛镇静实现更安全的结肠镜检查。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2001 Jul;54(1):1-7. doi: 10.1067/mge.2001.116174.
9
Safe and efficacious use of procedural sedation and analgesia by non-anesthesiologists in a pediatric hematology-oncology unit.非麻醉医生在儿科血液肿瘤病房安全有效地使用程序性镇静和镇痛。
Indian Pediatr. 2006 Apr;43(4):309-14.
10
Analgesia during abdominal aortic aneurysm endovascular repair: remifentanil vs. fentanyl-midazolam--a randomized controlled trial.腹主动脉瘤腔内修复术中的镇痛:瑞芬太尼与芬太尼-咪达唑仑——一项随机对照试验。
Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2009 Sep;26(9):782-7. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0b013e32832bcc9b.

引用本文的文献

1
Drugs for Procedural Sedation and Analgesia in Children: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.儿童程序性镇静与镇痛药物:一项系统评价与荟萃分析
Drugs R D. 2025 Aug 13. doi: 10.1007/s40268-025-00522-9.
2
A Narrative Review of Pain in Pediatric Oncology: The Opioid Option for Procedural and Surgical Pain.儿科肿瘤学疼痛的叙述性综述:程序性和手术疼痛的阿片类药物选择
Paediatr Drugs. 2025 Jan;27(1):19-39. doi: 10.1007/s40272-024-00654-6. Epub 2024 Sep 28.
3
Opioids for procedural pain in neonates.新生儿操作痛的阿片类药物。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Jun 23;6(6):CD015056. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD015056.pub3.
4
Opioids for procedural pain in neonates.新生儿操作痛的阿片类药物。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Apr 5;4(4):CD015056. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD015056.pub2.
5
Characterisation of multipotent stem cells from human peripheral blood using an improved protocol.使用改进方案对人外周血多能干细胞进行表征。
J Orthop Translat. 2019 Mar 7;19:18-28. doi: 10.1016/j.jot.2019.02.003. eCollection 2019 Oct.
6
Remifentanil-induced postoperative hyperalgesia: current perspectives on mechanisms and therapeutic strategies.瑞芬太尼诱发的术后痛觉过敏:机制与治疗策略的当前观点
Local Reg Anesth. 2018 Apr 9;11:15-23. doi: 10.2147/LRA.S143618. eCollection 2018.
7
Procedural sedation and analgesia in pediatric patients.儿科患者的程序性镇静与镇痛
J Pediatr Neurosci. 2014 Jan;9(1):1-6. doi: 10.4103/1817-1745.131469.
8
Using a powered bone marrow biopsy system results in shorter procedures, causes less residual pain to adult patients, and yields larger specimens.使用动力骨髓活检系统可缩短手术时间,减少成年患者的残余疼痛,并获得更大的标本。
Diagn Pathol. 2011 Mar 23;6:23. doi: 10.1186/1746-1596-6-23.
9
A randomized trial of nature scenery and sounds versus urban scenery and sounds to reduce pain in adults undergoing bone marrow aspirate and biopsy.一项随机试验研究自然景观和声音与城市景观和声音对减轻成年人接受骨髓抽吸和活检时疼痛的效果。
J Altern Complement Med. 2010 Sep;16(9):965-72. doi: 10.1089/acm.2009.0531.
10
Professional skills and competence for safe and effective procedural sedation in children: recommendations based on a systematic review of the literature.儿童安全有效程序性镇静的专业技能与能力:基于文献系统评价的建议
Int J Pediatr. 2010;2010:934298. doi: 10.1155/2010/934298. Epub 2010 Jun 28.