• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

利用英国现有数据对美国EQ-5D效用进行贝叶斯非参数估计。

Bayesian nonparametric estimation of EQ-5D utilities for United States using the existing United Kingdom data.

作者信息

Kharroubi Samer A

机构信息

Department of Nutrition and Food Sciences, Faculty of Agricultural and Food Sciences, American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon.

出版信息

Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2017 Oct 6;15(1):195. doi: 10.1186/s12955-017-0770-1.

DOI:10.1186/s12955-017-0770-1
PMID:28985757
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5639572/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Valuations of health state descriptors such as EQ-5D or SF6D have been conducted in different countries. There is a scope to make use of the results in one country as informative priors to help with the analysis of a study in another, for this to enable better estimation to be obtained in the new country than analyzing its data separately.

METHODS

Data from 2 EQ-5D valuation studies were analyzed using the time trade-off technique, where values for 42 health states were devised from representative samples of the UK and US populations. A Bayesian non-parametric approach has been applied to predict the health utilities of the US population, where the UK results were used as informative priors in the model to improve their estimation.

RESULTS

The findings showed that employing additional information from the UK data helped in the production of US utility estimates much more precisely than would have been possible using the US study data alone.

CONCLUSION

It is very plausible that this method would serve useful in countries where the conduction of large evaluation studies is not very feasible.

摘要

背景

诸如EQ - 5D或SF6D等健康状态描述符的估值已在不同国家进行。利用一个国家的结果作为信息先验,以帮助分析另一个国家的研究,这样做能比单独分析新国家的数据获得更好的估计。

方法

使用时间权衡技术分析了来自2项EQ - 5D估值研究的数据,其中42种健康状态的值是从英国和美国人群的代表性样本中得出的。采用贝叶斯非参数方法预测美国人群的健康效用,在该模型中英国的结果被用作信息先验以改进估计。

结果

研究结果表明,利用来自英国数据的额外信息,比仅使用美国研究数据能更精确地得出美国效用估计值。

结论

在进行大型评估研究不太可行的国家,这种方法很可能会发挥作用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/768a/5639572/02e2edc05f07/12955_2017_770_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/768a/5639572/181dc092fe6e/12955_2017_770_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/768a/5639572/0377beb4b37a/12955_2017_770_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/768a/5639572/01c7d9c3baaa/12955_2017_770_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/768a/5639572/02e2edc05f07/12955_2017_770_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/768a/5639572/181dc092fe6e/12955_2017_770_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/768a/5639572/0377beb4b37a/12955_2017_770_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/768a/5639572/01c7d9c3baaa/12955_2017_770_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/768a/5639572/02e2edc05f07/12955_2017_770_Fig4_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Bayesian nonparametric estimation of EQ-5D utilities for United States using the existing United Kingdom data.利用英国现有数据对美国EQ-5D效用进行贝叶斯非参数估计。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2017 Oct 6;15(1):195. doi: 10.1186/s12955-017-0770-1.
2
A comparison of United States and United Kingdom EQ-5D health states valuations using a nonparametric Bayesian method.采用非参数贝叶斯方法对美国和英国 EQ-5D 健康状态估值进行比较。
Stat Med. 2010 Jul 10;29(15):1622-34. doi: 10.1002/sim.3874.
3
Valuation of preference-based measures: can existing preference data be used to generate better estimates?基于偏好的衡量指标的评估:现有的偏好数据是否可以用来生成更好的估计值?
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2018 Jun 5;16(1):116. doi: 10.1186/s12955-018-0945-4.
4
Bayesian modeling of health state preferences: could borrowing strength from existing countries' valuations produce better estimates.健康状态偏好的贝叶斯建模:从现有国家的评估中借鉴优势能否产生更好的估计。
Eur J Health Econ. 2021 Jul;22(5):773-788. doi: 10.1007/s10198-021-01289-x. Epub 2021 Mar 24.
5
Valuation of preference-based measures: can existing preference data be used to select a smaller sample of health states?基于偏好的衡量标准的评估:能否使用现有的偏好数据来选择更小的健康状态样本?
Eur J Health Econ. 2019 Mar;20(2):245-255. doi: 10.1007/s10198-018-0991-1. Epub 2018 Jul 6.
6
Valuations of EQ-5D health states: are the United States and United Kingdom different?EQ-5D健康状态的估值:美国和英国有所不同吗?
Med Care. 2005 Mar;43(3):221-8. doi: 10.1097/00005650-200503000-00004.
7
Modelling a preference-based index for EQ-5D using a non-parametric Bayesian method.采用非参数贝叶斯方法对 EQ-5D 进行基于偏好的指数建模。
Qual Life Res. 2018 Nov;27(11):2841-2850. doi: 10.1007/s11136-018-1935-z. Epub 2018 Jul 14.
8
Use of a Non-parametric Bayesian Method to Model Health State Preferences: An Application to Polish and Irish EQ-5D-5L Valuations.使用非参数贝叶斯方法建模健康状态偏好:波兰和爱尔兰 EQ-5D-5L 估值的应用。
Front Public Health. 2022 Jun 23;10:917728. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.917728. eCollection 2022.
9
Modeling SF-6D Health Utilities: Is Bayesian Approach Appropriate?SF-6D 健康效用值建模:贝叶斯方法是否适用?
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Aug 9;18(16):8409. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18168409.
10
Capturing Valuation Study Sampling Uncertainty in the Estimation of Health State Utility Values Using the EQ-5D-3L.使用 EQ-5D-3L 估计健康状态效用值时,捕获估值研究抽样不确定性。
Med Decis Making. 2024 May;44(4):393-404. doi: 10.1177/0272989X241239899. Epub 2024 Apr 8.

引用本文的文献

1
Use of a Non-parametric Bayesian Method to Model Health State Preferences: An Application to Polish and Irish EQ-5D-5L Valuations.使用非参数贝叶斯方法建模健康状态偏好:波兰和爱尔兰 EQ-5D-5L 估值的应用。
Front Public Health. 2022 Jun 23;10:917728. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.917728. eCollection 2022.
2
Modeling SF-6D Health Utilities: Is Bayesian Approach Appropriate?SF-6D 健康效用值建模:贝叶斯方法是否适用?
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Aug 9;18(16):8409. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18168409.
3
Valuation of preference-based measures: can existing preference data be used to generate better estimates?

本文引用的文献

1
A Comparison of Japan and U.K. SF-6D Health-State Valuations Using a Non-Parametric Bayesian Method.使用非参数贝叶斯方法对日本和英国SF-6D健康状态估值的比较
Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2015 Aug;13(4):409-20. doi: 10.1007/s40258-015-0171-8.
2
A comparison of Hong Kong and United Kingdom SF-6D health states valuations using a nonparametric Bayesian method.使用非参数贝叶斯方法对香港和英国 SF-6D 健康状态估值进行比较。
Value Health. 2014 Jun;17(4):397-405. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2014.02.011. Epub 2014 May 10.
3
Modeling SF-6D Hong Kong standard gamble health state preference data using a nonparametric Bayesian method.
基于偏好的衡量指标的评估:现有的偏好数据是否可以用来生成更好的估计值?
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2018 Jun 5;16(1):116. doi: 10.1186/s12955-018-0945-4.
采用非参数贝叶斯方法对 SF-6D 香港标准博弈健康状态偏好数据进行建模。
Value Health. 2013 Sep-Oct;16(6):1032-45. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2013.06.020.
4
Decomposing cross-country differences in quality adjusted life expectancy: the impact of value sets.分解质量调整生命期望的跨国差异:价值体系的影响。
Popul Health Metr. 2011 Jun 23;9(1):17. doi: 10.1186/1478-7954-9-17.
5
A comparison of United States and United Kingdom EQ-5D health states valuations using a nonparametric Bayesian method.采用非参数贝叶斯方法对美国和英国 EQ-5D 健康状态估值进行比较。
Stat Med. 2010 Jul 10;29(15):1622-34. doi: 10.1002/sim.3874.
6
Estimating a preference-based index from the Japanese SF-36.从日本 SF-36 中估算偏好为基础的指标。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2009 Dec;62(12):1323-31. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.01.022. Epub 2009 Jul 16.
7
Modeling HUI 2 health state preference data using a nonparametric Bayesian method.使用非参数贝叶斯方法对健康效用指数2(HUI 2)健康状态偏好数据进行建模。
Med Decis Making. 2008 Nov-Dec;28(6):875-87. doi: 10.1177/0272989X08318460. Epub 2008 Oct 29.
8
Modelling covariates for the SF-6D standard gamble health state preference data using a nonparametric Bayesian method.使用非参数贝叶斯方法对SF-6D标准博弈健康状态偏好数据的协变量进行建模。
Soc Sci Med. 2007 Mar;64(6):1242-52. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2006.10.040. Epub 2006 Dec 8.
9
Modelling SF-6D health state preference data using a nonparametric Bayesian method.使用非参数贝叶斯方法对SF-6D健康状态偏好数据进行建模。
J Health Econ. 2007 May 1;26(3):597-612. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2006.09.002. Epub 2006 Oct 27.
10
Valuations of EQ-5D health states: are the United States and United Kingdom different?EQ-5D健康状态的估值:美国和英国有所不同吗?
Med Care. 2005 Mar;43(3):221-8. doi: 10.1097/00005650-200503000-00004.