Gimbel Helga, Zobbe Vibeke, Andersen Birthe M, Gluud Christian, Ottesen Bent S, Tabor Ann
Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Roskilde County Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2005 Feb;45(1):64-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1479-828X.2005.00350.x.
The aim of this study was to compare total and subtotal abdominal hysterectomy for benign indications, with regard to urinary incontinence, postoperative complications, quality of life (SF-36), constipation, prolapse, satisfaction with sexual life, and pelvic pain at 1-year postoperative. Eighty women chose total and 105 women chose subtotal abdominal hysterectomy. No significant differences were found between the 2 operation methods in any of the outcome measures at 12 months. Fourteen women (15%) from the subtotal abdominal hysterectomy group experienced vaginal bleeding and three women had their cervix removed.
本研究旨在比较因良性指征行全腹子宫切除术和次全腹子宫切除术在尿失禁、术后并发症、生活质量（SF-36）、便秘、脱垂、性生活满意度及术后1年盆腔疼痛方面的差异。80名女性选择了全腹子宫切除术，105名女性选择了次全腹子宫切除术。在12个月时的任何一项结局指标中，两种手术方法之间均未发现显著差异。次全腹子宫切除术组有14名女性（15%）出现阴道出血，3名女性切除了宫颈。
