Palmer C D, Jones K H, Jones P A, Polacarz S V, Evans G W L
Dyfed R&D Consortium, Wales.
Emerg Med J. 2005 Mar;22(3):165-70. doi: 10.1136/emj.2003.007674.
To investigate why and how patients decide to attend accident and emergency (A&E) departments, and to assess their satisfaction with the experience, in a predominantly rural west Wales population.
This was a semi-structured follow up telephone interview of patients who walked in to A&E in one of four general hospitals in west Wales and were triaged as Manchester Triage score 4 or 5. Patients were recruited by nurses during the period July-November 2002. The study sample consisted of 176 male and 145 female patients, mean (SD) age 36.6 (20.0) years. The main outcome measure was a quantitative and qualitative description of the recalled experiences of A&E attenders, the circumstances of their attendance, and their satisfaction with the experience.
Of the study sample, 78% attended with injury or illnesses of recent origin, and 50% with actual or presumed musculoskeletal injury, 73% of which were sustained within 10 miles of home. Travel to hospital was by private transport for 86%, average distance 7.4 miles. The majority (90%) were registered with a local GP, but 32% felt A&E was the obvious choice, and a further 44% considered their GP inaccessible to their needs. Patients' reasons for seeking health care at A&E were similar to those described in an English urban study. Waiting times were rarely excessive; 80% left within 2 hours, and patient satisfaction was generally high. Among the 87 patients (27%) who reported a less satisfactory experience, 48 (55%) of these complained of dismissive attitudes of doctors.
Anecdotal accounts of abuse of A&E services and unreasonable patient expectations gain the status of "urban legends" within the medical profession. Among the predominantly settled rural population in west Wales, there is little evidence of unreasonable patient expectations, and most patients report high satisfaction levels. Patients' bad experiences most frequently arise from a dismissive attitude on the part of medical staff. These attitudes are often consequent on an A&E culture that views some patients' attendances as less appropriate than others.
调查在西威尔士一个以农村人口为主的地区,患者决定前往 Accident and Emergency(A&E,即急诊)科室就诊的原因及方式,并评估他们对就诊体验的满意度。
这是一项对在西威尔士四家综合医院之一自行前往急诊且被分诊为曼彻斯特分诊评分4或5级的患者进行的半结构化随访电话访谈。患者由护士在2002年7月至11月期间招募。研究样本包括176名男性患者和145名女性患者,平均(标准差)年龄为36.6(20.0)岁。主要结局指标是对急诊就诊者回忆的经历、就诊情况及其对就诊体验的满意度进行定量和定性描述。
在研究样本中,78%的患者因近期受伤或患病前来就诊,50%因实际或疑似肌肉骨骼损伤前来就诊,其中73%的损伤发生在离家10英里范围内。86%的患者乘坐私人交通工具前往医院,平均距离为7.4英里。大多数(90%)患者在当地全科医生处注册,但32%的患者认为急诊是明显的选择,另有44%的患者认为他们的全科医生无法满足其需求。患者在急诊寻求医疗服务的原因与英国一项城市研究中描述的相似。等待时间很少过长;80%的患者在2小时内离开,患者总体满意度较高。在87名(27%)报告就诊体验不太满意的患者中,48名(55%)抱怨医生态度冷漠。
关于滥用急诊服务和患者不合理期望的传闻在医学界成为了“都市传说”。在西威尔士以定居为主的农村人口中,几乎没有证据表明患者期望不合理,大多数患者报告满意度较高。患者的不良体验最常源于医护人员的冷漠态度。这些态度往往源于急诊文化,即认为一些患者的就诊不如其他患者合适。