• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在存在验证偏倚和阅片者内相关性的情况下评估乳腺X线摄影的准确性。

Assessing accuracy of mammography in the presence of verification bias and intrareader correlation.

作者信息

Zheng Yingye, Barlow William E, Cutter Gary

机构信息

Division of Public Health Sciences, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, 1100 Fairview Avenue, North Seattle, Washington 98109, USA.

出版信息

Biometrics. 2005 Mar;61(1):259-68. doi: 10.1111/j.0006-341X.2005.031139.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.0006-341X.2005.031139.x
PMID:15737102
Abstract

The performance of a medical diagnostic test is often evaluated by comparing the outcome of the test to the patient's true disease state. Receiver operating characteristic analysis may then be used to summarize test accuracy. However, such analysis may encounter several complications in actual practice. One complication is verification bias, i.e., gold standard assessment of disease status may only be partially available and the probability of ascertainment of disease may depend on both the test result and characteristics of the subject. A second issue is that tests interpreted by the same rater may not be independent. Using estimating equations, we generalize previous methods that address these problems. We contrast the performance of alternative estimators of accuracy using robust sandwich variance estimators to permit valid asymptotic inference. We suggest that in the context of an observational cohort study where rich covariate information is available, a weighted estimating equations approach may be preferable for its robustness against model misspecification. We apply the methodology to mammography as performed by community radiologists.

摘要

医学诊断测试的性能通常通过将测试结果与患者的真实疾病状态进行比较来评估。然后可以使用接受者操作特征分析来总结测试准确性。然而,这种分析在实际操作中可能会遇到几个复杂问题。一个复杂问题是验证偏倚,即疾病状态的金标准评估可能仅部分可用,并且疾病确诊的概率可能取决于测试结果和受试者的特征。第二个问题是由同一评估者解释的测试可能不独立。我们使用估计方程,推广了以前解决这些问题的方法。我们使用稳健的三明治方差估计器来对比准确性的替代估计器的性能,以允许进行有效的渐近推断。我们建议,在可获得丰富协变量信息的观察性队列研究背景下,加权估计方程方法可能因其对模型误设的稳健性而更可取。我们将该方法应用于社区放射科医生进行的乳腺X线摄影。

相似文献

1
Assessing accuracy of mammography in the presence of verification bias and intrareader correlation.在存在验证偏倚和阅片者内相关性的情况下评估乳腺X线摄影的准确性。
Biometrics. 2005 Mar;61(1):259-68. doi: 10.1111/j.0006-341X.2005.031139.x.
2
A marginal model approach for analysis of multi-reader multi-test receiver operating characteristic (ROC) data.一种用于分析多读者多测试接收器操作特性(ROC)数据的边际模型方法。
Biostatistics. 2005 Apr;6(2):303-12. doi: 10.1093/biostatistics/kxi011.
3
Advanced integrated technique in breast cancer thermography.乳腺癌热成像中的先进集成技术。
J Med Eng Technol. 2008 Mar-Apr;32(2):103-14. doi: 10.1080/03091900600562040.
4
Nearest-Neighbor Estimation for ROC Analysis under Verification Bias.验证性偏倚下ROC分析的最近邻估计
Int J Biostat. 2015 May;11(1):109-24. doi: 10.1515/ijb-2014-0014.
5
Robust combination of multiple diagnostic tests for classifying censored event times.用于对删失事件时间进行分类的多种诊断测试的稳健组合。
Biostatistics. 2008 Apr;9(2):216-33. doi: 10.1093/biostatistics/kxm037. Epub 2007 Dec 3.
6
Measuring diagnostic and predictive accuracy in disease management: an introduction to receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis.衡量疾病管理中的诊断和预测准确性:接受者操作特征(ROC)分析简介。
J Eval Clin Pract. 2006 Apr;12(2):132-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2005.00598.x.
7
Verification bias-corrected estimators of the relative true and false positive rates of two binary screening tests.两种二元筛查试验相对真阳性率和假阳性率的验证性偏倚校正估计量。
Stat Med. 2005 Feb 15;24(3):403-17. doi: 10.1002/sim.1959.
8
Avoiding verification bias in screening test evaluation in resource poor settings: a case study from Zimbabwe.在资源匮乏地区的筛查试验评估中避免验证偏倚:来自津巴布韦的案例研究
Clin Trials. 2008;5(5):496-503. doi: 10.1177/1740774508096139.
9
Adjusting for differential-verification bias in diagnostic-accuracy studies: a Bayesian approach.调整诊断准确性研究中的差异验证偏倚:一种贝叶斯方法。
Epidemiology. 2011 Mar;22(2):234-41. doi: 10.1097/EDE.0b013e318207fc5c.
10
Evaluating medical diagnostic tests at the subunit level in the presence of verification bias.在存在验证偏倚的情况下,在亚单位水平评估医学诊断测试。
Stat Med. 2003 Jul 15;22(13):2161-76. doi: 10.1002/sim.1436.

引用本文的文献

1
Model-based clustering for assessing the prognostic value of imaging biomarkers and mixed type tests.基于模型的聚类分析用于评估影像生物标志物和混合型检测的预后价值。
Comput Stat Data Anal. 2017 Sep;113:125-135. doi: 10.1016/j.csda.2016.10.026. Epub 2016 Nov 2.
2
Estimation of diagnostic test accuracy without full verification: a review of latent class methods.未进行全面验证时诊断试验准确性的估计:潜在类别方法综述
Stat Med. 2014 Oct 30;33(24):4141-69. doi: 10.1002/sim.6218. Epub 2014 Jun 9.
3
Subject-centered free-response ROC (FROC) analysis.
以受试者为中心的自由反应 ROC(FROC)分析。
Med Phys. 2013 May;40(5):051706. doi: 10.1118/1.4799843.
4
Semiparametric estimation of the covariate-specific ROC curve in presence of ignorable verification bias.存在可忽略验证性偏倚时协变量特异性ROC曲线的半参数估计
Biometrics. 2011 Sep;67(3):906-16. doi: 10.1111/j.1541-0420.2011.01562.x. Epub 2011 Mar 1.
5
Time trends in radiologists' interpretive performance at screening mammography from the community-based Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium, 1996-2004.1996-2004 年社区乳腺癌监测联合会筛查性乳房 X 光摄影中放射科医生诊断表现的时间趋势。
Radiology. 2010 Jul;256(1):74-82. doi: 10.1148/radiol.10091881. Epub 2010 May 26.
6
Contrasting two frameworks for ROC analysis of ordinal ratings.对比两种用于ordinal ratings 的 ROC 分析框架。
Med Decis Making. 2010 Jul-Aug;30(4):484-98. doi: 10.1177/0272989X09357477. Epub 2010 Feb 10.