• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

界定国际空间站在1J和1E组装阶段遭轨道碎片穿透后乘员损失的风险。

Bounding the risk of crew loss following orbital debris penetration of the International Space Station at assembly stages 1J and 1E.

作者信息

Evans S, Lewis H, Williamsen J, Evans H, Bohl W

机构信息

NASA Marshall Space Flight Center (MSFC), Huntsville, AL 35812, USA.

出版信息

Adv Space Res. 2004;34(5):1104-8. doi: 10.1016/j.asr.2003.01.014.

DOI:10.1016/j.asr.2003.01.014
PMID:15739282
Abstract

Orbital debris impacts on the International Space Station occur frequently. To date, none of the impacting particles has been large enough to penetrate manned pressurized volumes. We used the Manned Spacecraft Crew Survivability code to evaluate the risk to crew of penetrations of pressurized modules at two assembly stages: after Flight 1J, when the pressurized elements of Kibo, the Japanese Experiment Module, are present, and after Flight 1E, when the European Columbus Module is present. Our code is a Monte-Carlo simulation of impacts on the Station that considers several potential event types that could lead to crew loss. Among the statistics tabulated by the program is the probability of death of one or more crew members in the event of a penetration, expressed as the risk factor, R. This risk factor is dependent on details of crew operations during both ordinary circumstances and decompression emergencies, as well as on details of internal module configurations. We conducted trade studies considering these procedure and configuration details to determine the bounds on R at the 1J and 1E stages in the assembly sequence. Here we compare the R-factor bounds, and procedures could that reduce R at these stages.

摘要

轨道碎片对国际空间站的撞击频繁发生。迄今为止,还没有任何撞击粒子大到足以穿透载人增压舱。我们使用载人航天器乘员生存能力代码,评估在两个组装阶段增压舱被穿透时乘员面临的风险:在第1J次飞行后,此时日本实验舱“希望号”的增压部件已安装;在第1E次飞行后,此时欧洲“哥伦布”舱已安装。我们的代码是对空间站撞击情况的蒙特卡洛模拟,考虑了几种可能导致乘员死亡的潜在事件类型。该程序列出的统计数据中包括穿透事件中一名或多名乘员死亡的概率,用风险因子R表示。这个风险因子取决于正常情况下和减压紧急情况下乘员操作的细节,以及舱内配置的细节。我们进行了权衡研究,考虑这些程序和配置细节,以确定组装序列中1J和1E阶段R的界限。在此我们比较R因子界限,以及在这些阶段可以降低R的程序。

相似文献

1
Bounding the risk of crew loss following orbital debris penetration of the International Space Station at assembly stages 1J and 1E.界定国际空间站在1J和1E组装阶段遭轨道碎片穿透后乘员损失的风险。
Adv Space Res. 2004;34(5):1104-8. doi: 10.1016/j.asr.2003.01.014.
2
Columbus: ready for the International Space Station.哥伦布号:准备前往国际空间站。
ESA Bull. 2005 Feb;121:46-51.
3
Automated guidance algorithms for a space station-based crew escape vehicle.用于基于空间站的乘员逃生飞行器的自动制导算法。
Adv Space Res. 2003 Apr;31(8):1995-2004. doi: 10.1016/s0273-1177(03)00173-x.
4
Microbe-I: fungal biota analyses of the Japanese experimental module KIBO of the International Space Station before launch and after being in orbit for about 460 days.微生物 I:国际空间站日本实验舱 KIBO 发射前和在轨约 460 天后的真菌生物群分析。
Microbiol Immunol. 2011 Dec;55(12):823-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1348-0421.2011.00386.x.
5
Space Station Freedom crew training.
Acta Astronaut. 1990;22:65-70. doi: 10.1016/0094-5765(90)90008-9.
6
[Fungal biota in manned space environment and impact on human health].[载人航天环境中的真菌生物群及其对人类健康的影响]
Nihon Eiseigaku Zasshi. 2011 Jan;66(1):77-82. doi: 10.1265/jjh.66.77.
7
EAC trains its first international astronaut class.欧洲航天局(EAC)培训了其首批国际宇航员学员。
ESA Bull. 2002 Nov;112:50-5.
8
Working aboard the Mir space station.在和平号空间站上工作。
ESA Bull. 1996 Nov;88:19-24.
9
[Ergonomic research on crew module layout in manned spacecraft system].
Space Med Med Eng (Beijing). 2001 Apr;14(2):144-8.
10
Man systems aspects in the design concept of the Columbus Man-Tended Free-Flyer (MTFF).哥伦布有人照料自由飞行器(MTFF)设计概念中的人类系统方面。
Acta Astronaut. 1989;20:39-49.