Greener Mark J, Guest Julian F
CATALYST Health Economics Consultants, Northwood, Middlesex HA6 1BN, UK.
CNS Drugs. 2005;19(3):253-64. doi: 10.2165/00023210-200519030-00006.
The ability to perform paid or unpaid work is integral to an individual's quality of life. Therefore, we performed a systematic literature review to examine the impact of depression and its treatment on occupational outcomes. This review found absenteeism from work to be markedly higher among depressed employees and productivity to be dramatically undermined by some symptoms of depression. Gaps in the published literature point to the need for future economic and clinical analyses to include work-related outcomes. Published studies showed that antidepressants can enhance work-related outcomes by alleviating affective symptoms. However, the pharmacological properties of antidepressants may produce differential effects that influence work-related outcomes in other ways. For example, TCAs, but not SSRIs, produce sedation and impair cognitive function in ways that could undermine work-related outcomes. Formal analyses are required to quantify whether the improved social functioning, motivation and vigilance that may be associated with some newer antidepressants translate into improved work-related outcomes. Although few published studies have directly quantified the cost benefit of managing depression and associated lost productivity, existing studies that directly assessed work-related outcomes have suggested that treating depression is cost effective. Gaps in the published literature imply that the impact of depression and antidepressants on occupational outcomes has been understudied. This reflects, in part, the fact that antidepressant studies lasting 4 or 6 weeks are unlikely to capture the impact of treatment on work-related measures. In addition, the current evidence base is fraught with other methodological limitations. The effect of depression on non-paid employment also requires further assessment. In conclusion, the efficacy of antidepressants on work-related outcomes should be measured in clinical trials that have an adequate design and a suitable follow-up period, and included in health technology assessments. Until such studies are available, the evidence base supporting the use of antidepressants will remain incomplete.
从事有偿或无偿工作的能力是个人生活质量的重要组成部分。因此,我们进行了一项系统的文献综述,以研究抑郁症及其治疗对职业结果的影响。该综述发现,抑郁员工的旷工率明显更高,抑郁症的某些症状会严重损害工作效率。已发表文献中的空白表明,未来的经济和临床分析需要纳入与工作相关的结果。已发表的研究表明,抗抑郁药可以通过缓解情感症状来改善与工作相关的结果。然而,抗抑郁药的药理特性可能会产生不同的影响,以其他方式影响与工作相关的结果。例如,三环类抗抑郁药(TCAs)而非选择性5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂(SSRIs)会产生镇静作用,并以可能损害与工作相关结果的方式损害认知功能。需要进行正式分析,以量化某些新型抗抑郁药可能带来的社交功能、动机和警觉性改善是否能转化为与工作相关结果的改善。尽管很少有已发表的研究直接量化管理抑郁症和相关生产力损失的成本效益,但直接评估与工作相关结果的现有研究表明,治疗抑郁症具有成本效益。已发表文献中的空白意味着抑郁症和抗抑郁药对职业结果的影响尚未得到充分研究。这部分反映了这样一个事实,即持续4周或6周的抗抑郁药研究不太可能捕捉到治疗对与工作相关指标的影响。此外,目前的证据基础还存在其他方法学上的局限性。抑郁症对无薪工作的影响也需要进一步评估。总之,抗抑郁药对与工作相关结果的疗效应在设计合理且随访期合适的临床试验中进行测量,并纳入卫生技术评估。在获得此类研究之前,支持使用抗抑郁药的证据基础仍将不完整。