Nath Dilip S, Gruessner Angelika, Kandaswamy Raja, Gruessner Rainer W, Sutherland David Er, Humar Abhinav
Department of Surgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Clin Transplant. 2005 Apr;19(2):220-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-0012.2005.00322.x.
Anastomotic leaks after pancreas transplants usually occur early in the postoperative course, but may also be seen late post-transplant. We studied such leaks to determine predisposing factors, methods of management, and outcomes.
Between January 1, 1994 and December 31, 2002, a total of 25 pancreas transplant recipients at our institution experienced a late leak (defined as one occurring more than 3 months post-transplant). We excluded recipients with an early leak or with a leak seen immediately after an enteric conversion. The mean recipient age was 40.3 yr; mean donor age, 31.3 yr. The category of transplant was as follows: simultaneous pancreas-kidney (n = 5, 20%), pancreas after kidney (n = 10, 40%), and pancreas transplant alone (n = 10, 40%). At the time of their leak, most recipients (n = 23, 92%) had bladder-drained pancreas grafts; only two recipients (8%) had enteric-drained grafts. The mean time from transplant to the late leak was 20.5 months (range = 3.5-74 months). A direct predisposing event or risk factor occurring in the 6 wk preceding leak diagnosis was identified in 10 (40%) of the recipients. Such events or risk factors included a biopsy-proven episode of acute rejection (n = 4, 16%), a history of blunt abdominal trauma (n = 3, 12%), a recent episode of cytomegalovirus infection (n = 2, 8%), and obstructive uropathy from acute prostatitis (n = 1, 4%). Non-operative or conservative care (Foley catheter placement with or without percutaneous abdominal drains) was the initial treatment in 14 (56%) of the recipients. Such care was successful in nine (64%) of the 14 recipients; the other five (36%) required surgical repair after failure of conservative care at a mean of 10 d after Foley catheter placement. Of the 25 recipients, 11 underwent surgery as their initial leak treatment: repair in nine and pancreatectomy because of severe peritonitis in two. After appropriate management (conservative or operative) of the initial leak, five (20%) of the 25 recipients had a recurrent leak; the mean length of time from initial leak to recurrent leak was 5.6 months. All five recipients with a recurrent leak ultimately required surgery.
Late anastomotic leaks are not uncommon; they may be more common with bladder-drained grafts. One-third of the recipients with a late leak had experienced some obvious preceding event that predisposed to the leak. For two-thirds of our stable recipients with bladder-drained grafts, non-operative treatment of the leak was successful.
胰腺移植术后吻合口漏通常发生在术后早期,但也可能在移植后期出现。我们对这类漏进行了研究,以确定易感因素、处理方法及结果。
1994年1月1日至2002年12月31日期间,我院共有25例胰腺移植受者发生了晚期漏(定义为移植后3个月以上出现的漏)。我们排除了早期漏或肠改道后立即出现漏的受者。受者平均年龄为40.3岁;供者平均年龄为31.3岁。移植类型如下:胰肾联合移植(n = 5,20%)、肾移植后胰腺移植(n = 10,40%)和单纯胰腺移植(n = 10,40%)。发生漏时,大多数受者(n = 23,92%)的胰腺移植物采用膀胱引流;只有2例受者(8%)采用肠道引流。从移植到晚期漏的平均时间为20.5个月(范围 = 3.5 - 74个月)。在10例(40%)受者中,在漏诊断前6周内发现了直接的易感事件或危险因素。这些事件或危险因素包括经活检证实的急性排斥发作(n = 4,16%)、腹部钝性外伤史(n = 3,12%)、近期巨细胞病毒感染发作(n = 2,8%)以及急性前列腺炎导致的梗阻性尿路病(n = 1,4%)。14例(56%)受者的初始治疗为非手术或保守治疗(放置Foley导尿管,有或无经皮腹腔引流)。这种治疗在14例受者中的9例(64%)成功;另外5例(36%)在放置Foley导尿管后平均10天保守治疗失败后需要手术修复。25例受者中,11例最初以手术治疗漏:9例进行修复,2例因严重腹膜炎行胰腺切除术。在对初始漏进行适当处理(保守或手术)后,25例受者中有5例(20%)发生复发性漏;从初始漏到复发性漏的平均时间为5.6个月。所有5例复发性漏的受者最终都需要手术。
晚期吻合口漏并不少见;在膀胱引流的移植物中可能更常见。三分之一发生晚期漏的受者在漏发生前经历了一些明显的易感事件。对于三分之二病情稳定且采用膀胱引流移植物的受者,漏的非手术治疗是成功的。