• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一项关于肺切除术后水封引流管采用吸引与不采用吸引的前瞻性随机对照试验。

A prospective randomized controlled trial of suction versus non-suction to the under-water seal drains following lung resection.

作者信息

Alphonso N, Tan C, Utley M, Cameron R, Dussek J, Lang-Lazdunski L, Treasure T

机构信息

Guy's Hospital, London SE1 9RT, UK.

出版信息

Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2005 Mar;27(3):391-4. doi: 10.1016/j.ejcts.2004.12.004. Epub 2005 Jan 13.

DOI:10.1016/j.ejcts.2004.12.004
PMID:15740944
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Practice varies as to whether or not suction is applied to under-water seal drains following lung surgery. We tested the null hypothesis that there is no difference with respect to air leak duration.

METHODS

Patients undergoing thoracotomy or video assisted thoracoscopic surgery for lobectomy or wedge resection had either low-pressure suction or no suction applied to their underwater seal bottles postoperatively. Patients were allocated using minimization, a method of unbiased allocation ensuring balance between the arms of a trial with respect to known or suspected confounding factors. The trial was powered for duration of air leak. If an air leak persisted on the 7th post-operative day, the surgeon determined further management. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis of air leak duration and a log rank test were performed on an intention-to-treat basis, with observations censored at 144h (6 complete days).

RESULTS

Of the 254 patients that entered the trial, data were available for analysis for 239 (123 no-suction and 116 suction). There was no significant difference in the cumulative persistence of air leaks between the two groups (P=0.62) and inspection of the Kaplan-Meier curves suggests that any difference is negligible.

CONCLUSIONS

Applying suction to the underwater seal drains following lung surgery makes no difference in terms of air leak duration. In the light of this finding we have adopted a uniform policy of no suction being applied to the underwater seal, from the time of surgery, unless a specific clinical judgment is made to use it. The anticipated gains are that this will reduce work and cost and aid mobilization.

摘要

目的

肺手术后是否对水封引流管进行吸引,实践中做法不一。我们检验了零假设,即漏气持续时间无差异。

方法

接受开胸手术或电视辅助胸腔镜手术进行肺叶切除术或楔形切除术的患者,术后对其水封瓶要么施加低压吸引,要么不进行吸引。采用最小化法分配患者,这是一种无偏分配方法,可确保试验组在已知或疑似混杂因素方面保持平衡。该试验以漏气持续时间为效能指标。如果术后第7天仍有漏气,外科医生决定进一步处理措施。基于意向性分析对漏气持续时间进行Kaplan-Meier生存分析并进行对数秩检验,观察在144小时(6整天)时进行截尾。

结果

进入试验的254例患者中,有239例(123例未吸引和116例吸引)的数据可供分析。两组之间漏气的累积持续时间无显著差异(P = 0.62),对Kaplan-Meier曲线的检查表明,任何差异都可忽略不计。

结论

肺手术后对水封引流管进行吸引,在漏气持续时间方面没有差异。鉴于这一发现,我们采用了统一的政策,即从手术时起,除非有特殊临床判断需要使用,否则不对水封管进行吸引。预期的好处是,这将减少工作量和成本,并有助于患者活动。

相似文献

1
A prospective randomized controlled trial of suction versus non-suction to the under-water seal drains following lung resection.一项关于肺切除术后水封引流管采用吸引与不采用吸引的前瞻性随机对照试验。
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2005 Mar;27(3):391-4. doi: 10.1016/j.ejcts.2004.12.004. Epub 2005 Jan 13.
2
The use of a water seal to manage air leaks after a pulmonary lobectomy: a retrospective study.肺叶切除术后使用水封法处理漏气:一项回顾性研究。
Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2006 Aug;12(4):242-4.
3
Comparison of water seal and suction after pulmonary lobectomy: a prospective, randomized trial.肺叶切除术后水封与吸引的比较:一项前瞻性随机试验。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2004 Jun;77(6):1932-7; discussion 1937. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2003.12.022.
4
A prospective randomized controlled study to assess the effectiveness of CoSeal® to seal air leaks in lung surgery.一项前瞻性随机对照研究评估 CoSeal® 密封肺手术中空气泄漏的效果。
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2011 Aug;40(2):304-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ejcts.2010.11.079. Epub 2011 Feb 1.
5
Alternate suction reduces prolonged air leak after pulmonary lobectomy: a randomized comparison versus water seal.交替吸引可减少肺叶切除术后的持续漏气:与水封的随机对照比较
Ann Thorac Surg. 2005 Sep;80(3):1052-5. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2005.03.073.
6
Initial chest tube management after pulmonary resection.肺切除术后的初始胸管管理。
Am Surg. 2005 May;71(5):416-9.
7
Preliminary report of a prospective, randomized trial of underwater seal for spontaneous and iatrogenic pneumothorax.自发性和医源性气胸水下密封的前瞻性随机试验初步报告
J Am Coll Surg. 2007 Jan;204(1):84-90. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2006.09.012. Epub 2006 Nov 28.
8
A proposal for management after lung resection, using a flexible silastic drain.使用可弯曲硅橡胶引流管进行肺切除术后管理的建议。
Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann. 2010 Oct;18(5):435-42. doi: 10.1177/0218492310380499.
9
Regulated tailored suction vs regulated seal: a prospective randomized trial on air leak duration.调控式经皮穿刺吸引与调控式密封:关于漏气持续时间的前瞻性随机试验。
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2013 May;43(5):899-904. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezs518. Epub 2012 Sep 28.
10
Avoiding chest tube placement after video-assisted thoracoscopic wedge resection of the lung.电视辅助胸腔镜肺楔形切除术后避免放置胸管。
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2004 May;25(5):872-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ejcts.2004.01.041.

引用本文的文献

1
Implantation of polyglycolic acid mesh over lung resection staple lines to prevent air leaks.在肺切除吻合钉线处植入聚乙醇酸网片以预防漏气。
JTCVS Tech. 2025 Jun 11;32:163-171. doi: 10.1016/j.xjtc.2025.05.022. eCollection 2025 Aug.
2
Chest drainage outcomes by water seal versus low suction on digital drainage systems after lung resection: retrospective study.肺切除术后数字引流系统中采用水封与低负压吸引的胸腔引流效果:一项回顾性研究
J Thorac Dis. 2024 Oct 31;16(10):6644-6650. doi: 10.21037/jtd-24-1069. Epub 2024 Oct 18.
3
Advancements in the Management of Postoperative Air Leak following Thoracic Surgery: From Traditional Practices to Innovative Therapies.
胸腔手术后肺漏气管理的进展:从传统方法到创新疗法。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2024 May 13;60(5):802. doi: 10.3390/medicina60050802.
4
Intraoperative prevention and conservative management of postoperative prolonged air leak after lung resection: a systematic review.肺切除术后持续性漏气的术中预防及保守治疗:一项系统评价
J Thorac Dis. 2023 Feb 28;15(2):878-892. doi: 10.21037/jtd-22-736. Epub 2023 Feb 24.
5
Promising Effects of Digital Chest Tube Drainage System for Pulmonary Resection: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.数字式胸腔闭式引流系统在肺切除术中的潜在效果:一项系统评价和网状Meta分析
J Pers Med. 2022 Mar 22;12(4):512. doi: 10.3390/jpm12040512.
6
Low suction on digital drainage devices promptly improves post-operative air leaks following lung resection operations: a retrospective study.数字引流装置低负压吸引可迅速改善肺切除术后的漏气情况:一项回顾性研究
J Cardiothorac Surg. 2021 Apr 21;16(1):105. doi: 10.1186/s13019-021-01485-z.
7
Recommendations from the Italian intersociety consensus on Perioperative Anesthesa Care in Thoracic surgery (PACTS) part 2: intraoperative and postoperative care.意大利胸外科围手术期麻醉护理跨学会共识(PACTS)第2部分:术中及术后护理的建议
Perioper Med (Lond). 2020 Oct 23;9:31. doi: 10.1186/s13741-020-00159-z. eCollection 2020.
8
Intrabronchial Valves for Air Leaks After Lobectomy, Segmentectomy, and Lung Volume Reduction Surgery.支气管镜肺减容术后、肺段切除术后和肺叶切除术后的支气管内活瓣治疗
Lung. 2019 Oct;197(5):627-633. doi: 10.1007/s00408-019-00268-7. Epub 2019 Aug 28.
9
How should we manage the chest drainage after a video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery lobectomy?在电视辅助胸腔镜手术肺叶切除术后,我们应如何管理胸腔引流?
J Thorac Dis. 2019 Jun;11(6):2212-2214. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2019.05.44.
10
Technology and evidence-based care enhance postoperative management of chest drains.技术与循证护理改善胸腔引流管的术后管理。
J Thorac Dis. 2018 Dec;10(12):6399-6403. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2018.11.99.