Montero Isabel, Hernandez Ildefonso, Asencio Ana, Bellver Francisco, LaCruz Maria, Masanet Maria Jose
Department of Medicine-Psychiatric Unit, University of Valencia, Avda. Blasco Ibañez 17, 46010 Valencia, Spain.
Psychiatry Res. 2005 Feb 28;133(2-3):187-95. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2002.12.001.
The study evaluated baseline characteristics that could be used to predict the outcome of family intervention in schizophrenia and focussed on identifying the subgroups of patients who were more likely to respond to one therapeutic modality than another. We conducted a controlled trial in which participants were assigned at random to either a Behavioral Family Intervention Group or a Relatives' Group. Patients in one catchment area, having suffered one psychotic relapse within the previous year and living with their families, were assessed by an independent evaluator at baseline and 12 months later. Some clinical and family factors such as the duration of illness, number of hospital admissions and relatives' level of psychological distress can predict the differential outcome of either type of family intervention modality. The results suggested that the short-term illness group requires more intensive and personal intervention, while the long-term illness group needs more continuous support. Our results should be confirmed in a larger sample before clinical recommendations can be made.
该研究评估了可用于预测精神分裂症家庭干预结果的基线特征,并着重于识别更有可能对一种治疗方式而非另一种治疗方式产生反应的患者亚组。我们进行了一项对照试验,将参与者随机分配到行为家庭干预组或亲属组。在一个集水区内,前一年有过一次精神病复发且与家人同住的患者,在基线时和12个月后由一名独立评估员进行评估。一些临床和家庭因素,如病程、住院次数和亲属的心理痛苦程度,可以预测任何一种家庭干预方式的不同结果。结果表明,短期患病组需要更强化和个性化的干预,而长期患病组需要更持续的支持。在提出临床建议之前,我们的结果应在更大的样本中得到证实。