Evans A T, Rogers L Q, Peden J G, Seelig C B, Layne R D, Levine M A, Levin M L, Grossman R S, Darden P M, Jackson S M, Ammerman A S, Settle M B, Stritter F T, Fletcher S W
Department of Medicine, Center for Health Promotion and Disease Prevention (Settle), School of Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill 27599-7110, USA.
Am J Prev Med. 1996 Jul-Aug;12(4):259-65.
Our objective was to determine whether an educational intervention and prompting intervention for physicians improved dietary counseling of patients with high blood cholesterol and resulted in beneficial changes in patients' diets and cholesterol levels. We instituted a factorial design, multicenter, randomized, placebo-controlled trial to test two interventions. We tested the trial at continuity care clinics of internal medicine residents at seven community and university medical centers in the northern and eastern United States. Our participants were 130 internal medicine residents and 254 adult outpatients with blood cholesterol levels of 240-300 mg/dL. Interventions included an educational program for resident physicians designed to improve their skills and confidence in dietary counseling (two one-hour sessions with specially prepared printed materials for use in counseling) and a prompting intervention, which was a fingerstick blood cholesterol determination prior to the patient's clinic visit. Resident physicians' knowledge, attitudes, and self-reported behaviors were assessed prior to the intervention and 10 months later using chart audits and questionnaires. Residents' behaviors were also assessed by exit interviews with patients. Patients' knowledge, attitudes, behaviors, and fingerstick blood cholesterol levels were measured at baseline and 10 months later. The educational program increased the percentage of physicians who were confident in providing effective dietary counseling (baseline of 26% to 67%-78%; P < .01). The prompting intervention approximately doubled the frequency of physician counseling (P = .0005) and increased the likelihood that patients would try to change their diets. When both interventions were combined, most outcomes were better, although not statistically significant. Cholesterol levels, however, decreased only marginally and were no different among groups at 10-month follow-up. Despite success in changing physicians' attitudes and behaviors and increasing patients' willingness to change their diets, there was no significant change in patients' cholesterol levels. Medical Subject Headings (MeSH): randomized controlled trial; cholesterol; patient education; behavior therapy; education, medical; diet.
我们的目标是确定针对医生的教育干预和提示干预是否能改善对高血胆固醇患者的饮食咨询,并使患者的饮食和胆固醇水平发生有益变化。我们开展了一项析因设计、多中心、随机、安慰剂对照试验来测试两种干预措施。我们在美国北部和东部的七个社区及大学医疗中心的内科住院医师连续性护理诊所进行了该试验。我们的参与者包括130名内科住院医师和254名血液胆固醇水平在240 - 300mg/dL的成年门诊患者。干预措施包括为住院医师设计的一个教育项目,旨在提高他们在饮食咨询方面的技能和信心(两个一小时的课程,并配有专门准备的用于咨询的印刷材料)以及一种提示干预,即在患者门诊就诊前进行一次指尖血胆固醇测定。在干预前及10个月后,通过病历审查和问卷调查对住院医师的知识、态度和自我报告行为进行评估。还通过与患者的出院访谈来评估住院医师的行为。在基线和10个月后测量患者的知识、态度、行为及指尖血胆固醇水平。该教育项目提高了对提供有效饮食咨询有信心的医生的比例(从基线的26%提高到67% - 78%;P < 0.01)。提示干预使医生咨询的频率增加了约一倍(P = 0.0005),并增加了患者尝试改变饮食的可能性。当两种干预措施结合时,大多数结果更好,尽管无统计学意义。然而,胆固醇水平仅略有下降,在10个月随访时各组之间无差异。尽管在改变医生的态度和行为以及提高患者改变饮食的意愿方面取得了成功,但患者的胆固醇水平没有显著变化。医学主题词(MeSH):随机对照试验;胆固醇;患者教育;行为疗法;医学教育;饮食。