Haimerl J, Freitag-Krikovic A, Rauch A, Sauer E
Department of Internal Medicine, Hospital Landshut-Achdorf, Achdorfer Weg 3, 84036 Landshut, Germany.
Z Kardiol. 2005 Mar;94(3):173-81. doi: 10.1007/s00392-005-0198-1.
MRI allows visualization and planimetry of the aortic valve orifice and accurate determination of left ventricular muscle mass, which are important parameters in aortic stenosis. In contrast to invasive methods, MRI planimetry of the aortic valve area (AVA) is flow independent. AVA is usually indexed to body surface area. Left ventricular muscle mass is dependent on weight and height in healthy individuals. We studied AVA, left ventricular muscle mass (LMM) and ejection fraction (EF) in 100 healthy individuals and in patients with symptomatic aortic valve stenosis (AS). All were examined by MRI (1.5 Tesla Siemens Sonate) and the AVA was visualized in segmented 2D flash sequences and planimetry of the performed AVA was manually. The aortic valve area in healthy individuals was 3.9+/-0.7 cm(2), and the LMM was 99+/-27 g. In a correlation analysis, the strongest correlation of AVA was to height (r=0.75, p<0.001) and for LMM to weight (r=0.64, p<0.001). In a multiple regression analysis, the expected AVA for healthy subjects can be predicted using body height: AVA=-2.64+0.04 x(height in cm) -0.47 x w (w=0 for man, w=1 for female).In patients with aortic valve stenosis, AVA was 1.0+/-0.35 cm(2), in correlation to cath lab r=0.72, and LMM was 172+/-56 g. We compared the AS patients results with the data of the healthy subjects, where the reduction of the AVA was 28+/-10% of the expected normal value, while LMM was 42% higher in patients with AS. There was no correlation to height, weight or BSA in patients with AS. With cardiac MRI, planimetry of AVA for normal subjects and patients with AS offered a simple, fast and non-invasive method to quantify AVA. In addition LMM and EF could be determined. The strong correlation between height and AVA documented in normal subjects offered the opportunity to integrate this relation between expected valve area and definitive orifice in determining the disease of the aortic valve for the individual patient. With diagnostic MRI in patients with AS, invasive measurements of the systolic transvalvular gradient does not seem to be necessary.
磁共振成像(MRI)能够对主动脉瓣口进行可视化和平面测量,并准确测定左心室肌肉质量,这些都是主动脉瓣狭窄的重要参数。与侵入性方法不同,MRI对主动脉瓣面积(AVA)的平面测量不依赖于血流。AVA通常以体表面积进行校正。在健康个体中,左心室肌肉质量取决于体重和身高。我们研究了100名健康个体以及有症状的主动脉瓣狭窄(AS)患者的AVA、左心室肌肉质量(LMM)和射血分数(EF)。所有人均接受了MRI检查(1.5特斯拉西门子Sonate),通过分段二维快速成像序列对AVA进行可视化,并手动对所测AVA进行平面测量。健康个体的主动脉瓣面积为3.9±0.7平方厘米,LMM为99±27克。在相关性分析中,AVA与身高的相关性最强(r = 0.75,p < 0.001),LMM与体重的相关性最强(r = 0.64,p < 0.001)。在多元回归分析中,可使用身高预测健康受试者的预期AVA:AVA = -2.64 + 0.04×(身高,单位为厘米) - 0.47×w(男性w = 0,女性w = 1)。在主动脉瓣狭窄患者中,AVA为1.0±0.35平方厘米,与心导管实验室测量结果的相关性r = 0.72,LMM为172±56克。我们将AS患者的结果与健康受试者的数据进行比较发现,AVA降低了预期正常值的28±10%,而AS患者的LMM则高出42%。AS患者的AVA与身高、体重或体表面积均无相关性。通过心脏MRI,对正常受试者和AS患者进行AVA平面测量提供了一种简单、快速且无创的方法来量化AVA。此外,还可以测定LMM和EF。正常受试者中身高与AVA之间的强相关性为在确定个体患者的主动脉瓣疾病时,将预期瓣膜面积与确定的瓣口之间的这种关系整合起来提供了机会。对于AS患者,诊断性MRI似乎无需进行收缩期跨瓣压差的侵入性测量。