Haghi D, Suselbeck T, Fluechter S, Kalmar G, Schroder M, Kaden J J, Poerner T, Borggrefe M, Papavassiliu T
I. Medizinische Klinik, Universitätsklinikum Mannheim, 68167, Mannheim, Germany.
Clin Res Cardiol. 2006 Mar;95(3):162-7. doi: 10.1007/s00392-006-0355-1. Epub 2006 Feb 13.
We replaced Doppler-derived stroke volume in the continuity equation (method A) by either right heart catheterization-derived stroke volume (method B) or cardiovascular magnetic resonance-derived stroke volume (method C) to calculate aortic valve area in 20 consecutive patients with moderate or severe aortic stenosis. Comparison of both hybrid methods (methods B and C) by Bland-Altman analysis showed a mean difference near zero, a spread within two standard deviations and very similar limits of agreement. More importantly, all patients were classified into the same category of severity by both methods.
我们在连续性方程(方法A)中,用右心导管检查得出的每搏输出量(方法B)或心血管磁共振得出的每搏输出量(方法C)替代多普勒得出的每搏输出量,以计算20例中度或重度主动脉瓣狭窄患者的主动脉瓣面积。通过布兰德-奥特曼分析对两种混合方法(方法B和方法C)进行比较,结果显示平均差异接近零,离散度在两个标准差范围内,一致性界限非常相似。更重要的是,两种方法将所有患者都归为同一严重程度类别。