Suppr超能文献

一种使用心脏磁共振成像和超声心动图对主动脉瓣狭窄进行量化的混合方法:与右心导管检查和标准超声心动图的比较。

A hybrid approach for quantification of aortic valve stenosis using cardiac magnetic resonance imaging and echocardiography: comparison to right heart catheterization and standard echocardiography.

作者信息

Haghi D, Suselbeck T, Fluechter S, Kalmar G, Schroder M, Kaden J J, Poerner T, Borggrefe M, Papavassiliu T

机构信息

I. Medizinische Klinik, Universitätsklinikum Mannheim, 68167, Mannheim, Germany.

出版信息

Clin Res Cardiol. 2006 Mar;95(3):162-7. doi: 10.1007/s00392-006-0355-1. Epub 2006 Feb 13.

Abstract

We replaced Doppler-derived stroke volume in the continuity equation (method A) by either right heart catheterization-derived stroke volume (method B) or cardiovascular magnetic resonance-derived stroke volume (method C) to calculate aortic valve area in 20 consecutive patients with moderate or severe aortic stenosis. Comparison of both hybrid methods (methods B and C) by Bland-Altman analysis showed a mean difference near zero, a spread within two standard deviations and very similar limits of agreement. More importantly, all patients were classified into the same category of severity by both methods.

摘要

我们在连续性方程(方法A)中,用右心导管检查得出的每搏输出量(方法B)或心血管磁共振得出的每搏输出量(方法C)替代多普勒得出的每搏输出量,以计算20例中度或重度主动脉瓣狭窄患者的主动脉瓣面积。通过布兰德-奥特曼分析对两种混合方法(方法B和方法C)进行比较,结果显示平均差异接近零,离散度在两个标准差范围内,一致性界限非常相似。更重要的是,两种方法将所有患者都归为同一严重程度类别。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验