• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Em18抗原免疫显性区域的鉴定及泡型棘球蚴病血清诊断特异性的提高

Identification of the immunodominant regions of the Em18 antigen and improved serodiagnostic specificity for alveolar echinococcosis.

作者信息

Jiang L, Xu X-N, Li X, Xue H-C, Feng Z

机构信息

National Institute of Parasitic Diseases, Chinese Centre for Disease Control and Prevention, Shanghai 200025, China.

出版信息

Parasite Immunol. 2004 Oct;26(10):377-85. doi: 10.1111/j.0141-9838.2004.00723.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.0141-9838.2004.00723.x
PMID:15752115
Abstract

The aim of this work was to identify the immunodominant regions of the Em18 antigen to improve the specificity in diagnosis of alveolar echinococcosis (AE). Two recombinant antigens ReEm18-1 and ReEm18-2, which have the same sequence except that nine amino acid residues are absent in ReEm18-2, were tested by ELISA and Western Blot (WB) for their diagnostic efficiency. Serological evaluation of the two antigens demonstrated that the sensitivity of both antigens was 95.5% in ELISA and WB, and the specificity was 93.6% and 95.7% in ELISA, and 81.4% and 82.9% in WB, respectively. Five more expression clones (EmS1-EmS5), which contain different regions of the Em18 sequence, were constructed for defining the immunodominant regions of the antigen. Fourteen monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) against ReEm18-2 antigen and the sera from different groups of patients were used to identify the epitope regions of the five antigen fragments. Results showed that the epitopes recognized by the mAbs are located in the N-terminal third of the sequence, but the immunodominant area recognized by native serum antibodies may be located further downstream (C-terminal) in the sequence. The nonspecific cross-reactivity is due to epitopes present in the C-terminal third of the sequence. The antigen fragments that contain the first two-thirds of the sequence have the same sensitivity to AE sera as those of the ReEm18-1 and ReEm18-2 antigens, but removal of the C-terminal third of the sequence improved the specificity of the assay from 93.6% to 99.3% (ELISA) and 81.4% to 90.7% (WB). We conclude that the necessary part of the ReEm18 antigen sequence for AE diagnosis is the N-terminal half to two-thirds of the entire sequence.

摘要

本研究旨在确定Em18抗原的免疫显性区域,以提高肺泡型包虫病(AE)诊断的特异性。通过ELISA和Western Blot(WB)检测了两种重组抗原ReEm18-1和ReEm18-2的诊断效率,这两种抗原除ReEm18-2缺少九个氨基酸残基外序列相同。对这两种抗原的血清学评估表明,两种抗原在ELISA和WB中的敏感性均为95.5%,在ELISA中的特异性分别为93.6%和95.7%,在WB中分别为81.4%和82.9%。构建了另外五个包含Em18序列不同区域的表达克隆(EmS1-EmS5),以确定该抗原的免疫显性区域。使用针对ReEm18-2抗原的14种单克隆抗体(mAb)和不同组患者的血清来鉴定五个抗原片段的表位区域。结果表明,mAb识别的表位位于序列的N端三分之一处,但天然血清抗体识别的免疫显性区域可能位于序列下游更远的位置(C端)。非特异性交叉反应是由于序列C端三分之一处存在的表位。包含序列前三分之二的抗原片段对AE血清的敏感性与ReEm18-1和ReEm18-2抗原相同,但去除序列的C端三分之一可将检测的特异性从93.6%提高到99.3%(ELISA),从81.4%提高到90.7%(WB)。我们得出结论,AE诊断所需ReEm18抗原序列的必要部分是整个序列的N端一半至三分之二。

相似文献

1
Identification of the immunodominant regions of the Em18 antigen and improved serodiagnostic specificity for alveolar echinococcosis.Em18抗原免疫显性区域的鉴定及泡型棘球蚴病血清诊断特异性的提高
Parasite Immunol. 2004 Oct;26(10):377-85. doi: 10.1111/j.0141-9838.2004.00723.x.
2
[Gene cloning, expression and serological evaluation of diagnostic antigen Em18 for alveolar echinococcosis].泡型包虫病诊断抗原Em18的基因克隆、表达及血清学评价
Zhongguo Ji Sheng Chong Xue Yu Ji Sheng Chong Bing Za Zhi. 2004 Aug;22(4):193-8.
3
Improved serodiagnosis of alveolar echinococcosis of humans using an in vitro-produced Echinococcus multilocularis antigen.使用体外产生的多房棘球绦虫抗原改进人体肺泡型棘球蚴病的血清学诊断
Parasitology. 2007 Jun;134(Pt 6):879-88. doi: 10.1017/S0031182006002083. Epub 2007 Feb 19.
4
Serodiagnosis of alveolar echinococcosis: detection of antibody against EM18 in patients and rodents.肺泡型棘球蚴病的血清学诊断:检测患者和啮齿动物体内抗EM18抗体
Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health. 1997;28 Suppl 1:117-24.
5
Diagnosis of alveolar echinococcosis using immunoblotting with plural low molecular weight antigens.使用多种低分子量抗原的免疫印迹法诊断肺泡型棘球蚴病
J Helminthol. 2009 Mar;83(1):57-61. doi: 10.1017/S0022149X08116510. Epub 2008 Nov 25.
6
Serological confirmatory testing of alveolar and cystic echinococcosis in clinical practice: results of a comparative study with commercialized and in-house assays.临床实践中肺泡型和囊型棘球蚴病的血清学确诊检测:商业化检测与内部检测对比研究结果
Clin Lab. 2009;55(1-2):41-8.
7
Wuchereria bancrofti: cloning and characterization of heat shock protein 70 from the human lymphatic filarial parasite.班氏吴策线虫:人类淋巴丝虫寄生虫热休克蛋白70的克隆与特性分析
Exp Parasitol. 2004 Jan-Feb;106(1-2):1-10. doi: 10.1016/j.exppara.2004.01.001.
8
Analysis on the reactivity of five subunits of antigen B family in serodiagnosis of echinococcosis.分析抗原 B 家族五个亚基在包虫病血清学诊断中的反应性。
Exp Parasitol. 2012 May;131(1):85-91. doi: 10.1016/j.exppara.2012.03.009. Epub 2012 Mar 21.
9
Dogs as victims of their own worms: Serodiagnosis of canine alveolar echinococcosis.狗成为自身蠕虫的受害者:犬肺泡棘球蚴病的血清学诊断。
Parasit Vectors. 2017 Sep 16;10(1):422. doi: 10.1186/s13071-017-2369-0.
10
Peptide epitopes of the Taenia solium antigen Ts8B2 are immunodominant in human and porcine cysticercosis.猪带绦虫抗原Ts8B2的肽表位在人和猪囊尾蚴病中具有免疫显性。
Mol Biochem Parasitol. 2009 Dec;168(2):168-71. doi: 10.1016/j.molbiopara.2009.08.003. Epub 2009 Aug 25.

引用本文的文献

1
Expression and serodiagnostic efficacy of a novel echinococcosis-specific recombinant fusion antigen rAgB8/1-Em18-Eg95.一种新型包虫病特异性重组融合抗原rAgB8/1-Em18-Eg95的表达及血清学诊断效能
Parasitology. 2024 Nov;151(13):1458-1465. doi: 10.1017/S0031182024001173.
2
Serological Screening of Patients Diagnosed with Alveolar Echinococcus Disease in Their Home Regions.对在其家乡地区被诊断为肺泡型棘球蚴病的患者进行血清学筛查。
Iran J Parasitol. 2022 Oct-Dec;17(4):554-561. doi: 10.18502/ijpa.v17i4.11283.
3
Cross-reactivity of the 31 kDa antigen of Angiostrongylus cantonensis - Dealing with the immunodiagnosis of meningoencephalitis.
广州管圆线虫31 kDa抗原的交叉反应性——关于脑膜脑炎的免疫诊断
Parasitology. 2017 Apr;144(4):459-463. doi: 10.1017/S0031182016001918. Epub 2016 Nov 21.