自我报告的关节炎的有效性和可靠性:佐治亚州老年中心,2000 - 2001年
Validity and reliability of self-reported arthritis: Georgia senior centers, 2000-2001.
作者信息
Bombard Jennifer M, Powell Kenneth E, Martin Linda M, Helmick Charles G, Wilson William H
机构信息
Arthritis Foundation, Georgia Chapter, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
出版信息
Am J Prev Med. 2005 Apr;28(3):251-8. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2004.12.004.
BACKGROUND
Arthritis and other rheumatic conditions are a common cause of disability among adults in the United States. Telephone interviews of the state-based Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) are used by states and territories to estimate the prevalence of arthritis. The purpose of this study was to assess the validity and reliability of the 1996-2001 BRFSS arthritis case definition in a senior center population.
METHODS
A total of 487 respondents at selected senior centers in Georgia were surveyed by telephone, evaluated 3 to 4 weeks later by board-certified rheumatologists, and completed a written survey in 2000 to 2001. Using the rheumatologists' summary assessment "Does this person have arthritis or a related condition" as the standard, the sensitivity and specificity of the BRFSS arthritis case definitions were calculated. Reliability for the BRFSS arthritis case definition was also calculated by comparing responses to the telephone survey with responses to a written survey.
RESULTS
Sensitivity was 70.8% (95% confidence interval [CI]=65.9-75.6), and the specificity was 70.3% (95% CI=62.9-77.8). The agreement between the telephone and written responses indicating self-reported arthritis was high (kappa=0.68). Analyses were conducted in 2002 to 2004.
CONCLUSIONS
Self-reported arthritis in the 1996-2001 BRFSS was highly reliable, and moderately sensitive and specific among these senior center participants.
背景
关节炎和其他风湿性疾病是美国成年人残疾的常见原因。各州和领地利用基于州的行为危险因素监测系统(BRFSS)的电话访谈来估计关节炎的患病率。本研究的目的是评估1996 - 2001年BRFSS关节炎病例定义在老年中心人群中的有效性和可靠性。
方法
对佐治亚州选定老年中心的487名受访者进行电话调查,3至4周后由获得委员会认证的风湿病学家进行评估,并于2000年至2001年完成书面调查。以风湿病学家的总结评估“此人是否患有关节炎或相关疾病”为标准,计算BRFSS关节炎病例定义的敏感性和特异性。还通过比较电话调查的回答与书面调查的回答来计算BRFSS关节炎病例定义的可靠性。
结果
敏感性为70.8%(95%置信区间[CI]=65.9 - 75.6),特异性为70.3%(95% CI=62.9 - 77.8)。表明自我报告患有关节炎的电话和书面回答之间的一致性很高(kappa = 0.68)。分析在2002年至2004年进行。
结论
1996 - 2001年BRFSS中自我报告的关节炎在这些老年中心参与者中高度可靠,且具有中等敏感性和特异性。