Westbury Chris
Department of Psychology, University of Alberta, P220 Biological Sciences Buldings, Edmonton, AB, Canada T6G 2E9.
Brain Lang. 2005 Apr;93(1):10-9. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2004.07.006.
Köhler (1929) reported anecdotally that, when asked to choose, subjects were much more likely to attach the name 'takete' to a spiky abstract object, and the name 'baluma' (or, by 1947, 'maluma') to a curvy abstract object. Follow-up work has suffered from the same three weaknesses as Köhler's original anecdotal study: a reliance on small number of stimuli carefully selected by the experimenter; the use of manipulations that were transparent to the subject; and the use of overtly semantic tasks. This paper reports two experiments that replicate and extend Köhler's claims using an implicit interference task that allows for multiple measures per subject, and does not require subjects to make explicit decisions about the relation between visual form and meaning. Subjects undertook a lexical or letter decision task with the stimuli presented inside spiky or curvy frames. Reaction times show interference patterns consistent with Köhler's claims. This demonstrates that the effect is pre-semantic. Neurological reasons for these word/shape and character/shape interference phenomena are discussed.
科勒(1929年)轶事性地报道称,当被要求做出选择时,受试者更有可能将“塔凯特”这个名字与一个有尖刺的抽象物体联系起来,而将“巴卢马”(或者到1947年时的“马卢马”)这个名字与一个弯曲的抽象物体联系起来。后续研究与科勒最初的轶事性研究一样存在三个弱点:依赖实验者精心挑选的少量刺激物;使用对受试者来说显而易见的操作;以及使用明显的语义任务。本文报告了两项实验,这两项实验使用了一种隐式干扰任务来重复并扩展科勒的观点,该任务允许对每个受试者进行多种测量,并且不要求受试者对视觉形式和意义之间的关系做出明确决策。受试者在带有尖刺或弯曲框架的刺激物呈现的情况下进行词汇或字母判断任务。反应时间显示出与科勒观点一致的干扰模式。这表明这种效应是前语义的。文中讨论了这些单词/形状和字符/形状干扰现象的神经学原因。