Chen Jianbo, Dang Que, Unutmaz Derya, Pathak Vinay K, Maldarelli Frank, Powell Douglas, Hu Wei-Shau
HIV Drug Resistance Program, National Cancer Institute-Frederick, Frederick, MD 21702, USA.
J Virol. 2005 Apr;79(7):4140-9. doi: 10.1128/JVI.79.7.4140-4149.2005.
We previously demonstrated that human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) infection is nonrandom and that double infection occurs more frequently than predicted from random events. To probe the possible mechanisms for nonrandom infection, we examined the role of HIV-1 entry pathways by using viruses pseudotyped with either CCR5-tropic HIV-1 Env or vesicular stomatitis virus G protein (VSV G). These two proteins use different receptors and entry pathways. We found that regardless of the protein used, double infection occurred more frequently than random events, indicating nonrandom HIV-1 infection in both entry pathways. However, the frequency of double infection differed significantly, depending on the envelope protein. In primary CD4(+) T cells, double infection occurred most frequently when both viruses had CCR5-tropic HIV-1 Env and least frequently when the two viruses had different envelopes. These results indicated that the preference in virus entry was a significant but not the only factor contributing to nonrandom double infection. Furthermore, we demonstrated that the CD4 expression level in primary T cells affects their susceptibility to CCR5-tropic HIV-1 infection but not VSV G-pseudotyped HIV-1 infection. We have also examined infection with two viruses pseudotyped with CCR5- or CXCR4-tropic HIV-1 Env and have found that double infection occurred more frequently than random events. These results indicate that coreceptor usage is not a barrier to recombination between the two virus populations. In our previous study, we also demonstrated nonrandom double infection via dendritic cell (DC)-mediated HIV-1 transmission. To test our hypothesis that multiple HIV-1 virions are transmitted during DC-T-cell contact, we used two populations of DCs, each capturing one vector virus, and added both DC populations to T cells. We observed a decreased frequency of double infection compared with experiments in which DCs captured both viruses simultaneously. Therefore, these results support our hypothesis that multiple virions are transmitted from DCs to T cells during cell-mediated HIV-1 transmission.
我们之前证明,1型人类免疫缺陷病毒(HIV-1)感染并非随机发生,且双重感染的发生频率高于随机事件的预期。为探究非随机感染的可能机制,我们通过使用携带CCR5嗜性HIV-1包膜蛋白(Env)或水疱性口炎病毒G蛋白(VSV G)的假型病毒,研究了HIV-1进入途径的作用。这两种蛋白使用不同的受体和进入途径。我们发现,无论使用哪种蛋白,双重感染的发生频率均高于随机事件,表明在两种进入途径中HIV-1感染均非随机。然而,双重感染的频率因包膜蛋白而异。在原代CD4(+) T细胞中,当两种病毒均携带CCR5嗜性HIV-1 Env时,双重感染发生频率最高;当两种病毒具有不同包膜时,双重感染发生频率最低。这些结果表明,病毒进入的偏好是导致非随机双重感染的一个重要但非唯一因素。此外,我们证明原代T细胞中的CD4表达水平影响其对CCR5嗜性HIV-1感染的易感性,但不影响VSV G假型HIV-1感染。我们还研究了携带CCR5或CXCR4嗜性HIV-1 Env的两种假型病毒的感染情况,发现双重感染的发生频率高于随机事件。这些结果表明,共受体的使用并非两种病毒群体之间重组的障碍。在我们之前的研究中,我们还证明了通过树突状细胞(DC)介导的HIV-1传播存在非随机双重感染。为了验证我们的假设,即在DC-T细胞接触期间会传播多个HIV-1病毒粒子,我们使用了两群DC,每群捕获一种载体病毒,然后将两群DC都加入到T细胞中。与DC同时捕获两种病毒的实验相比,我们观察到双重感染的频率降低。因此,这些结果支持了我们的假设,即在细胞介导的HIV-1传播过程中,多个病毒粒子从DC传递到T细胞。