Morin Astrid M, Kerwat Klaus M, Klotz Martina, Niestolik Roswitha, Ruf Veronika E, Wulf Hinnerk, Zimmermann Stefan, Eberhart Leopold Hj
Department of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Philipps University, Baldingerstrasse 1, D-35043 Marburg, Germany.
BMC Anesthesiol. 2005 Mar 17;5(1):1. doi: 10.1186/1471-2253-5-1.
Although several potential risk factors have been discussed, risk factors associated with bacterial colonization or even infection of catheters used for regional anaesthesia are not very well investigated. METHODS: In this prospective observational trial, 198 catheters at several anatomical sites where placed using a standardized technique. The site of insertion was then monitored daily for signs of infection (secretion at the insertion site, redness, swelling, or local pain). The catheters were removed when clinically indicated (no or moderate postoperative pain) or when signs of potential infection occurred. After sterile removal they were prospectively analyzed for colonization, defined as > 15 colony forming units. RESULTS: 33 (16.7%) of all catheters were colonized, and 18 (9.1%) of these with additional signs of local inflammation. Two of these patients required antibiotic treatment due to superficial infections. Stepwise logistic regression analysis was used to identify factors associated with catheter colonization. Out of 26 potential factors, three came out as statistically significant. Catheter placement in the groin (odds-ratio and 95%-confidence interval: 3.4; 1.5-7.8), and repeated changing of the catheter dressing (odds-ratio: 2.1; 1.4-3.3 per removal) increased the risk for colonization, whereas systemic antibiotics administered postoperatively decreased it (odds ratio: 0.41; 0.12-1.0). CONCLUSION: Colonization of peripheral and epidural nerve catheter can only in part be predicted at the time of catheter insertion since two out of three relevant variables that significantly influence the risk can only be recorded postoperatively. Catheter localisation in the groin, removal of the dressing and omission of postoperative antibiotics were associated with, but were not necessarily causal for bacterial colonization. These factors might help to identify patients who are at increased risk for catheter colonization.
尽管已经讨论了几种潜在的风险因素,但与用于区域麻醉的导管细菌定植甚至感染相关的风险因素尚未得到很好的研究。方法:在这项前瞻性观察试验中,使用标准化技术在几个解剖部位放置了198根导管。然后每天监测插入部位是否有感染迹象(插入部位有分泌物、发红、肿胀或局部疼痛)。当临床指征显示(无或中度术后疼痛)或出现潜在感染迹象时,将导管拔除。在无菌拔除后,对导管进行前瞻性分析,以确定是否定植,定植定义为>15个菌落形成单位。结果:所有导管中有33根(16.7%)被定植,其中18根(9.1%)伴有局部炎症的其他迹象。其中两名患者因浅表感染需要抗生素治疗。采用逐步逻辑回归分析来确定与导管定植相关的因素。在26个潜在因素中,有3个具有统计学意义。导管放置在腹股沟区(优势比和95%置信区间:3.4;1.5 - 7.8)以及反复更换导管敷料(每次更换的优势比:2.1;1.4 - 3.3)会增加定植风险,而术后使用全身性抗生素则会降低定植风险(优势比:0.41;0.12 - 1.0)。结论:由于显著影响风险的三个相关变量中有两个只能在术后记录,因此在导管插入时只能部分预测外周和硬膜外神经导管的定植情况。导管位于腹股沟区、更换敷料以及未使用术后抗生素与细菌定植相关,但不一定是因果关系。这些因素可能有助于识别导管定植风险增加的患者。