Davey Ronald B, Miller J Allen, George John E, Miller Robert J
USDA, ARS, SPA, Cattle Fever Tick Research Laboratory, Edinburg, TX 78541, USA.
Exp Appl Acarol. 2005;35(1-2):117-29. doi: 10.1007/s10493-004-2046-9.
The effectiveness of a single treatment with either ivermectin or moxidectin was determined by administering a single subcutaneous injection of each endectocide at 200 microg per kg body weight to cattle infested with all parasitic developmental stages (adults, nymphs, and larvae) of Boophilus microplus (Canestrini). The percentage reduction in the number of females that reached repletion following treatment (outright kill) was 94.8 and 91.1% for ivermectin and moxidectin, respectively. In addition, the reproductive capacity of the females that did survive to repletion was reduced by > 99%, regardless of the endectocide. Based on these two factors, the therapeutic level of control obtained against ticks on the cattle at the time of treatment was 99.0 and 99.1% for ivermectin and moxidectin, respectively. Engorged females recovered from either group of treated cattle weighed approximately 3-times less than untreated females, and the egg masses produced by treated females weighed approximately 5-8-times less than egg masses produced by untreated females. Partitioning of data into three separate 7-d post-treatment intervals allowed for an estimation of the efficacy of each endectocide against each individual parasitic development stage (adult, nymph, and larva). Results indicated that both endectocides were > or =99.7% effective against ticks that were in either the adult or nymphal stage at the time of treatment. However, the level of control against ticks in the larval stage of development at treatment was significantly lower at 97.9 and 98.4% for ivermectin and moxidectin, respectively. Analysis of the persistent (residual) activity of the two endectocides indicated that neither material provided total protection against larval re-infestation for even 1-wk following treatment. Against larvae infested 1-4 wk following treatment, the level of control with moxidectin ranged from 92.4% (1 wk) to 19.5% (4 wk). These control levels were higher at each weekly interval than for ivermectin, which ranged from 82.4% (1 wk) to 0.0% (4 wk). The potential for the use of these injectable endectocide formulations in the US Boophilus Eradication Program is discussed.
通过给感染微小牛蜱(Canestrini)所有寄生发育阶段(成虫、若虫和幼虫)的牛,按每千克体重200微克的剂量皮下注射伊维菌素或莫西菌素这两种体内外寄生虫杀虫剂中的一种,来测定单次治疗的效果。治疗后饱血雌蜱数量的减少百分比(直接杀死),伊维菌素为94.8%,莫西菌素为91.1%。此外,无论使用哪种体内外寄生虫杀虫剂,存活至饱血的雌蜱的繁殖能力均降低了99%以上。基于这两个因素,治疗时对牛蜱的治疗控制水平,伊维菌素为99.0%,莫西菌素为99.1%。从两组治疗牛中回收的饱血雌蜱重量比未治疗的雌蜱轻约3倍,治疗雌蜱产生的卵块重量比未治疗雌蜱产生的卵块轻约5 - 8倍。将数据划分为三个单独的治疗后7天间隔,以便估计每种体内外寄生虫杀虫剂对每个单独寄生发育阶段(成虫、若虫和幼虫)的疗效。结果表明,两种体内外寄生虫杀虫剂对治疗时处于成虫或若虫阶段的蜱的有效性均≥99.7%。然而,治疗时对处于幼虫发育阶段的蜱的控制水平显著较低,伊维菌素和莫西菌素分别为97.9%和98.4%。对两种体内外寄生虫杀虫剂的持续(残留)活性分析表明,治疗后即使1周内,两种药物均未提供针对幼虫再次感染的完全保护。对于治疗后1 - 4周感染的幼虫,莫西菌素的控制水平范围为92.4%(1周)至19.5%(4周)。这些控制水平在每个周期间隔均高于伊维菌素,伊维菌素的范围为82.4%(1周)至0.0%(4周)。讨论了这些可注射体内外寄生虫杀虫剂制剂在美国消灭微小牛蜱计划中的应用潜力。