Vickers K J, Niel L, Kiehlbauch L M, Weary D M
Animal Welfare Program, Faculty of Agricultural Sciences, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver V6T 1Z4, Canada.
J Dairy Sci. 2005 Apr;88(4):1454-9. doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(05)72813-7.
Dairy producers require effective methods of reducing the pain associated with dehorning. Previous work has shown that analgesics can reduce pain associated with hot-iron dehorning, but these interventions may not be practical for some producers. Some producers favor the use of caustic paste (to cause a chemical burn as opposed to thermal burn), but little is known about how to treat pain caused by caustic burns. In 2 experiments, head shaking and head rubbing behaviors were used to evaluate pain following dehorning using caustic paste. In experiment 1, sedated calves were dehorned using a caustic paste, with or without a lidocaine local block. Calves treated with lidocaine showed no evidence of reduced pain response in the hours after the caustic paste was applied. In experiment 2, response to caustic paste dehorning with a sedative only was compared with hot-iron dehorning using a sedative and local anesthetic. In the first 4 h after dehorning, calves dehorned with a hot iron showed more head shaking than calves dehorned with caustic paste. These results indicate that dehorning with caustic paste combined with a sedative results in less pain to calves than dehorning with a hot iron combined with a sedative and a local anesthetic.
乳制品生产商需要有效的方法来减轻与去角相关的疼痛。先前的研究表明,镇痛药可以减轻与热烙铁去角相关的疼痛,但这些干预措施对一些生产商来说可能并不实用。一些生产商倾向于使用苛性糊剂(造成化学灼伤而非热灼伤),但对于如何治疗苛性灼伤引起的疼痛却知之甚少。在两项实验中,通过甩头和蹭头行为来评估使用苛性糊剂去角后的疼痛情况。在实验1中,对镇静后的小牛使用苛性糊剂去角,有无利多卡因局部阻滞。使用利多卡因治疗的小牛在涂抹苛性糊剂后的数小时内没有表现出疼痛反应减轻的迹象。在实验2中,将仅使用镇静剂进行苛性糊剂去角的反应与使用镇静剂和局部麻醉剂进行热烙铁去角的反应进行了比较。去角后的前4小时内,热烙铁去角的小牛比苛性糊剂去角的小牛甩头更多。这些结果表明,与使用镇静剂和局部麻醉剂进行热烙铁去角相比,使用镇静剂并结合苛性糊剂去角给小牛带来的疼痛更少。