Golde Todd E
Department of Neuroscience, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Jacksonville, Florida 32224, USA.
Brain Pathol. 2005 Jan;15(1):84-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1750-3639.2005.tb00104.x.
In recent years the amyloid cascade hypothesis of Alzheimer disease (AD) has been increasingly referred to as the amyloid beta protein (Abeta) cascade hypothesis. This subtle rephrasing reflects the acknowledgment that there is debate within the field as to whether Abeta aggregates other than Abeta deposited as classic amyloid fibrils could trigger the pathological cascade that results in neuronal dysfunction and neurodegeneration. Despite this semantic shift, which highlights one enigmatic aspects of AD, the evidence supporting the Abeta hypothesis of AD is extensive. More importantly the Abeta hypothesis of AD has led and will continue to lead to the development of rationale therapeutic strategies that are likely to either prevent or treat this devastating disease. In this review, the evidence supporting the Abeta hypothesis and the recent advances in anti-Abeta therapy are discussed.
近年来,阿尔茨海默病(AD)的淀粉样蛋白级联假说越来越多地被称为β淀粉样蛋白(Aβ)级联假说。这种细微的措辞变化反映了该领域内存在的争议,即除了以经典淀粉样纤维形式沉积的Aβ之外,其他Aβ聚集体是否会引发导致神经元功能障碍和神经退行性变的病理级联反应。尽管这一语义转变突出了AD的一个神秘方面,但支持AD的Aβ假说的证据却很广泛。更重要的是,AD的Aβ假说已经并将继续引领合理治疗策略的发展,这些策略有可能预防或治疗这种毁灭性疾病。在这篇综述中,我们将讨论支持Aβ假说的证据以及抗Aβ治疗的最新进展。