Evans Lynn, Akiskal Hagop S, Keck Paul E, McElroy Susan L, Sadovnick A Dessa, Remick Ronald A, Kelsoe John R
Department of Psychiatry, UCSD, School of Medicine, University of California, 9500 Gilman Drive, La Jolla, CA 92093-0603, USA.
J Affect Disord. 2005 Mar;85(1-2):153-68. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2003.10.015.
The array of different diagnoses and clinical presentations seen in the family members of bipolar probands suggests a quantitative or spectrum phenotype. Consistent with this idea, it has been proposed that an underlying quantitative variation in temperament may be the primary phenotype that is genetically transmitted and that it in turn predisposes to bipolar disorder (BP). Choosing the appropriate phenotypic model for BP is crucial for success in genetic mapping studies. To test this theory, various measures of temperament were examined in the family members of bipolar probands. We predicted that a gradient of scores would be observed from those with BP to those with major depression to unaffected relatives to controls.
Members of 85 bipolar families and 63 control subjects were administered clinical interviews for diagnosis (SCID) and two temperament assessments, the TEMPS-A and TCI-125. Subjects with BP, major depressive disorder, unaffected relatives, and controls were compared on each temperament scale and on eight factors extracted from a joint factor analysis of the TEMPS-A and TCI-125.
The four groups were found to be significantly different and with the expected order of average group scores for four of the TEMPS-A scales, three of the TCI-125 scales, and one of the extracted factors. On the fifth TEMPS-A scale, hyperthymic, controls scored higher than the other three subject groups contrary to expectations. Significant differences were seen between unaffected relatives and controls on the hyperthymic scale and on the first extracted factor, anxious/reactive.
Controls were mainly recruited through advertisements, which may have introduced an ascertainment bias. It is also possible that mood state at the time of completing the questionnaire influenced subject's rating of their temperament. Additionally, bipolar I and bipolar II subjects were placed in the same group even though they had some differing clinical features.
Our data support the theory that some dimensions of temperament are transmitted in families as quantitative traits that are part of a broader bipolar spectrum. In particular, the hyperthymic scale of the TEMPS-A and the anxious/reactive extracted factor distinguished unaffected relatives from controls. The hyperthymic scale yielded results opposite to expectation with controls higher than any family group. This may be an artifact of the self-rated form of the questionnaire, a consequence of our grouping bipolar I and II subjects together, or the result of a "protective" factor and bears further study. Nevertheless, both of these scales may be useful quantitative traits for genetic mapping studies.
双相情感障碍先证者的家庭成员中出现的一系列不同诊断和临床表现提示存在一种定量或谱系表型。与此观点一致的是,有人提出气质方面潜在的定量变异可能是遗传传递的主要表型,进而易患双相情感障碍(BP)。为双相情感障碍选择合适的表型模型对于基因定位研究的成功至关重要。为了验证这一理论,我们在双相情感障碍先证者的家庭成员中对各种气质测量方法进行了研究。我们预测,从双相情感障碍患者到重度抑郁症患者,再到未受影响的亲属和对照组,会观察到一个分数梯度。
对85个双相情感障碍家庭的成员和63名对照者进行了临床访谈以进行诊断(SCID),并进行了两项气质评估,即TEMPS - A和TCI - 125。对双相情感障碍患者、重度抑郁症患者、未受影响的亲属和对照组在每个气质量表以及从TEMPS - A和TCI - 125的联合因子分析中提取的八个因子上进行了比较。
发现这四组在TEMPS - A量表中的四个、TCI - 125量表中的三个以及提取的一个因子上存在显著差异,且平均组分数符合预期顺序。在TEMPS - A的第五个量表,即情感高涨量表上,对照组得分高于其他三个受试者组,与预期相反。在情感高涨量表和第一个提取的因子,即焦虑/反应性因子上,未受影响的亲属和对照组之间存在显著差异。
对照组主要通过广告招募,这可能引入了一种确定偏倚。也有可能在完成问卷时的情绪状态影响了受试者对其气质的评分。此外,尽管双相I型和双相II型受试者有一些不同的临床特征,但仍被归为同一组。
我们的数据支持这样一种理论,即气质 的某些维度作为定量性状在家族中传递,是更广泛双相谱系的一部分。特别是,TEMPS - A的情感高涨量表和提取的焦虑/反应性因子区分了未受影响的亲属和对照组。情感高涨量表得出的结果与预期相反,对照组得分高于任何家族组。这可能是问卷自评形式的人为因素、我们将双相I型和II型受试者归为一组的结果,或者是一个“保护”因素的结果,有待进一步研究。然而,这两个量表可能都是基因定位研究中有用的定量性状。