• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一种用于蛋白质-配体、蛋白质-蛋白质和蛋白质-DNA复合物的基于知识的能量函数。

A knowledge-based energy function for protein-ligand, protein-protein, and protein-DNA complexes.

作者信息

Zhang Chi, Liu Song, Zhu Qianqian, Zhou Yaoqi

机构信息

Howard Hughes Medical Institute Center for Single Molecule Biophysics, Department of Physiology & Biophysics, State University of New York at Buffalo, 124 Sherman Hall, Buffalo, New York 14214, USA.

出版信息

J Med Chem. 2005 Apr 7;48(7):2325-35. doi: 10.1021/jm049314d.

DOI:10.1021/jm049314d
PMID:15801826
Abstract

We developed a knowledge-based statistical energy function for protein-ligand, protein-protein, and protein-DNA complexes by using 19 atom types and a distance-scale finite ideal-gas reference (DFIRE) state. The correlation coefficients between experimentally measured protein-ligand binding affinities and those predicted by the DFIRE energy function are around 0.63 for one training set and two testing sets. The energy function also makes highly accurate predictions of binding affinities of protein-protein and protein-DNA complexes. Correlation coefficients between theoretical and experimental results are 0.73 for 82 protein-protein (peptide) complexes and 0.83 for 45 protein-DNA complexes, despite the fact that the structures of protein-protein (peptide) and protein-DNA complexes were not used in training the energy function. The results of the DFIRE energy function on protein-ligand complexes are compared to the published results of 12 other scoring functions generated from either physical-based, knowledge-based, or empirical methods. They include AutoDock, X-Score, DrugScore, four scoring functions in Cerius 2 (LigScore, PLP, PMF, and LUDI), four scoring functions in SYBYL (F-Score, G-Score, D-Score, and ChemScore), and BLEEP. While the DFIRE energy function is only moderately successful in ranking native or near native conformations, it yields the strongest correlation between theoretical and experimental binding affinities of the testing sets and between rmsd values and energy scores of docking decoys in a benchmark of 100 protein-ligand complexes. The parameters and the program of the all-atom DFIRE energy function are freely available for academic users at http://theory.med.buffalo.edu.

摘要

我们通过使用19种原子类型和距离尺度有限理想气体参考(DFIRE)状态,为蛋白质-配体、蛋白质-蛋白质和蛋白质-DNA复合物开发了一种基于知识的统计能量函数。对于一个训练集和两个测试集,实验测量的蛋白质-配体结合亲和力与DFIRE能量函数预测的亲和力之间的相关系数约为0.63。该能量函数对蛋白质-蛋白质和蛋白质-DNA复合物的结合亲和力也能做出高度准确的预测。尽管蛋白质-蛋白质(肽)和蛋白质-DNA复合物的结构未用于训练能量函数,但对于82个蛋白质-蛋白质(肽)复合物,理论结果与实验结果之间的相关系数为0.73,对于45个蛋白质-DNA复合物,相关系数为0.83。将DFIRE能量函数对蛋白质-配体复合物的结果与其他12种基于物理、基于知识或经验方法生成的评分函数的已发表结果进行了比较。它们包括AutoDock、X-Score、DrugScore、Cerius 2中的四个评分函数(LigScore、PLP、PMF和LUDI)、SYBYL中的四个评分函数(F-Score、G-Score、D-Score和ChemScore)以及BLEEP。虽然DFIRE能量函数在对天然或接近天然构象进行排名时仅取得了一定程度的成功,但在100个蛋白质-配体复合物的基准测试中,它在测试集的理论和实验结合亲和力之间以及对接诱饵的均方根偏差值和能量得分之间产生了最强的相关性。全原子DFIRE能量函数的参数和程序可供学术用户在http://theory.med.buffalo.edu免费获取。

相似文献

1
A knowledge-based energy function for protein-ligand, protein-protein, and protein-DNA complexes.一种用于蛋白质-配体、蛋白质-蛋白质和蛋白质-DNA复合物的基于知识的能量函数。
J Med Chem. 2005 Apr 7;48(7):2325-35. doi: 10.1021/jm049314d.
2
Comparative evaluation of 11 scoring functions for molecular docking.11种分子对接评分函数的比较评估
J Med Chem. 2003 Jun 5;46(12):2287-303. doi: 10.1021/jm0203783.
3
An extensive test of 14 scoring functions using the PDBbind refined set of 800 protein-ligand complexes.使用包含800个蛋白质-配体复合物的PDBbind精制集对14种评分函数进行的广泛测试。
J Chem Inf Comput Sci. 2004 Nov-Dec;44(6):2114-25. doi: 10.1021/ci049733j.
4
Assessing scoring functions for protein-ligand interactions.评估蛋白质-配体相互作用的评分函数。
J Med Chem. 2004 Jun 3;47(12):3032-47. doi: 10.1021/jm030489h.
5
A general and fast scoring function for protein-ligand interactions: a simplified potential approach.一种用于蛋白质-配体相互作用的通用快速评分函数:一种简化的势能方法。
J Med Chem. 1999 Mar 11;42(5):791-804. doi: 10.1021/jm980536j.
6
Comparative assessment of scoring functions on a diverse test set.在多样化测试集上对评分函数的比较评估。
J Chem Inf Model. 2009 Apr;49(4):1079-93. doi: 10.1021/ci9000053.
7
Role of binding entropy in the refinement of protein-ligand docking predictions: analysis based on the use of 11 scoring functions.结合熵在蛋白质-配体对接预测优化中的作用:基于11种评分函数的分析
J Comput Chem. 2007 Jun;28(8):1364-72. doi: 10.1002/jcc.20580.
8
A physical reference state unifies the structure-derived potential of mean force for protein folding and binding.一种物理参考状态统一了蛋白质折叠和结合中源自结构的平均力势。
Proteins. 2004 Jul 1;56(1):93-101. doi: 10.1002/prot.20019.
9
Supervised consensus scoring for docking and virtual screening.对接和虚拟筛选的监督一致性评分
J Chem Inf Model. 2007 Mar-Apr;47(2):526-34. doi: 10.1021/ci6004993. Epub 2007 Feb 13.
10
The consequences of scoring docked ligand conformations using free energy correlations.使用自由能相关性对对接配体构象进行评分的后果。
Eur J Med Chem. 2007 Jul;42(7):921-33. doi: 10.1016/j.ejmech.2006.12.037. Epub 2007 Jan 21.

引用本文的文献

1
High-speed atomic force microscopy and 3D modeling reveal the structural dynamics of ADAR1 complexes.高速原子力显微镜和三维建模揭示了ADAR1复合物的结构动力学。
Nat Commun. 2025 May 26;16(1):4757. doi: 10.1038/s41467-025-59987-6.
2
PPI-Graphomer: enhanced protein-protein affinity prediction using pretrained and graph transformer models.PPI-Graphomer:使用预训练和图变换器模型增强蛋白质-蛋白质亲和力预测
BMC Bioinformatics. 2025 Apr 29;26(1):116. doi: 10.1186/s12859-025-06123-2.
3
PCANN Program for Structure-Based Prediction of Protein-Protein Binding Affinity: Comparison With Other Neural-Network Predictors.
基于结构的蛋白质-蛋白质结合亲和力预测的PCANN程序:与其他神经网络预测器的比较
Proteins. 2025 Sep;93(9):1498-1506. doi: 10.1002/prot.26821. Epub 2025 Mar 21.
4
The potential inhibitory mechanism of EGCG against the Chikungunya virus targeting non-structural protein 2 through molecular dynamics simulation.EGCG 对基孔肯雅病毒非结构蛋白 2 的潜在抑制机制:基于分子动力学模拟的研究。
Sci Rep. 2024 Nov 30;14(1):29797. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-81287-0.
5
Variant Impact Predictor database (VIPdb), version 2: trends from three decades of genetic variant impact predictors.变异影响预测器数据库(VIPdb),版本 2:三十年来遗传变异影响预测器的趋势。
Hum Genomics. 2024 Aug 28;18(1):90. doi: 10.1186/s40246-024-00663-z.
6
Assessment of Protein-Protein Docking Models Using Deep Learning.利用深度学习评估蛋白质-蛋白质对接模型。
Methods Mol Biol. 2024;2780:149-162. doi: 10.1007/978-1-0716-3985-6_10.
7
Variant Impact Predictor database (VIPdb), version 2: Trends from 25 years of genetic variant impact predictors.变异影响预测数据库(VIPdb),版本2:25年基因变异影响预测的趋势
bioRxiv. 2024 Jun 28:2024.06.25.600283. doi: 10.1101/2024.06.25.600283.
8
Computational Approaches to Predict Protein-Protein Interactions in Crowded Cellular Environments.计算方法在拥挤细胞环境中预测蛋白质-蛋白质相互作用。
Chem Rev. 2024 Apr 10;124(7):3932-3977. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.3c00550. Epub 2024 Mar 27.
9
Predictive Models and Impact of Interfacial Contacts and Amino Acids on Protein-Protein Binding Affinity.预测模型以及界面接触和氨基酸对蛋白质-蛋白质结合亲和力的影响
ACS Omega. 2024 Jan 11;9(3):3454-3468. doi: 10.1021/acsomega.3c06996. eCollection 2024 Jan 23.
10
Systematic investigation of machine learning on limited data: A study on predicting protein-protein binding strength.对有限数据上机器学习的系统研究:一项预测蛋白质-蛋白质结合强度的研究。
Comput Struct Biotechnol J. 2023 Dec 20;23:460-472. doi: 10.1016/j.csbj.2023.12.018. eCollection 2024 Dec.