Suppr超能文献

一项关于电子临床提醒以改善糖尿病和冠状动脉疾病护理质量的随机试验。

A randomized trial of electronic clinical reminders to improve quality of care for diabetes and coronary artery disease.

作者信息

Sequist Thomas D, Gandhi Tejal K, Karson Andrew S, Fiskio Julie M, Bugbee Donald, Sperling Michael, Cook E Francis, Orav E John, Fairchild David G, Bates David W

机构信息

Division of General Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medcal School, 1620 Tremont Street, Boston, MA 02120, USA.

出版信息

J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2005 Jul-Aug;12(4):431-7. doi: 10.1197/jamia.M1788. Epub 2005 Mar 31.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of an integrated patient-specific electronic clinical reminder system on diabetes and coronary artery disease (CAD) care and to assess physician attitudes toward this reminder system.

DESIGN

We enrolled 194 primary care physicians caring for 4549 patients with diabetes and 2199 patients with CAD at 20 ambulatory clinics. Clinics were randomized so that physicians received either evidence-based electronic reminders within their patients' electronic medical record or usual care. There were five reminders for diabetes care and four reminders for CAD care.

MEASUREMENTS

The primary outcome was receipt of recommended care for diabetes and CAD. We created a summary outcome to assess the odds of increased compliance with overall diabetes care (based on five measures) and overall CAD care (based on four measures). We surveyed physicians to assess attitudes toward the reminder system.

RESULTS

Baseline adherence rates to all quality measures were low. While electronic reminders increased the odds of recommended diabetes care (odds ratio [OR] 1.30, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.01-1.67) and CAD (OR 1.25, 95% CI 1.01-1.55), the impact of individual reminders was variable. A total of three of nine reminders effectively increased rates of recommended care for diabetes or CAD. The majority of physicians (76%) thought that reminders improved quality of care.

CONCLUSION

An integrated electronic reminder system resulted in variable improvement in care for diabetes and CAD. These improvements were often limited and quality gaps persist.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在评估针对患者个体的综合电子临床提醒系统对糖尿病和冠状动脉疾病(CAD)护理的影响,并评估医生对该提醒系统的态度。

设计

我们招募了20家门诊诊所的194名初级保健医生,这些医生负责照顾4549名糖尿病患者和2199名CAD患者。诊所被随机分组,以便医生在患者的电子病历中接收基于证据的电子提醒或接受常规护理。糖尿病护理有五条提醒,CAD护理有四条提醒。

测量

主要结果是接受针对糖尿病和CAD的推荐护理。我们创建了一个综合结果来评估提高总体糖尿病护理(基于五项指标)和总体CAD护理(基于四项指标)依从性的几率。我们对医生进行了调查,以评估他们对提醒系统的态度。

结果

所有质量指标的基线依从率都很低。虽然电子提醒增加了接受推荐糖尿病护理的几率(优势比[OR]为1.30,95%置信区间[CI]为1.01 - 1.67)和CAD护理的几率(OR为1.25,95%CI为1.01 - 1.55),但各个提醒的影响各不相同。九条提醒中共有三条有效地提高了糖尿病或CAD推荐护理的比例。大多数医生(76%)认为提醒改善了护理质量。

结论

综合电子提醒系统在糖尿病和CAD护理方面带来了不同程度的改善。这些改善往往有限,质量差距仍然存在。

相似文献

1
A randomized trial of electronic clinical reminders to improve quality of care for diabetes and coronary artery disease.
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2005 Jul-Aug;12(4):431-7. doi: 10.1197/jamia.M1788. Epub 2005 Mar 31.
4
Design and acceptability of patient-oriented computerized diabetes care reminders for use at the point of care.
Med Inform Internet Med. 2004 Jun;29(2):157-68. doi: 10.1080/14639230412331280413.
5
A randomized trial of electronic clinical reminders to improve medication laboratory monitoring.
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2008 Jul-Aug;15(4):424-9. doi: 10.1197/jamia.M2602. Epub 2008 Apr 24.
6
Manually-generated reminders delivered on paper: effects on professional practice and patient outcomes.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Dec 18;12(12):CD001174. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001174.pub4.
7
Pharmacist recommendations to improve the quality of diabetes care: a randomized controlled trial.
J Manag Care Pharm. 2010 Mar;16(2):104-13. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2010.16.2.104.
8
Identifying barriers to the effective use of clinical reminders: bootstrapping multiple methods.
J Biomed Inform. 2005 Jun;38(3):189-99. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2004.11.015. Epub 2004 Dec 15.
9
Electronic clinical reminder and quality of primary diabetes care.
Prim Care Diabetes. 2019 Apr;13(2):150-157. doi: 10.1016/j.pcd.2018.08.007. Epub 2018 Sep 12.

引用本文的文献

2
Electronic Health Record Nudges and Health Care Quality and Outcomes in Primary Care: A Systematic Review.
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Sep 3;7(9):e2432760. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.32760.
5
Quality of care of patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus at a public sector district hospital.
S Afr Fam Pract (2004). 2023 Jun 6;65(1):e1-e9. doi: 10.4102/safp.v65i1.5713.
6
A multi-site randomized trial of a clinical decision support intervention to improve problem list completeness.
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2023 Apr 19;30(5):899-906. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocad020.
9
Development of an Electronic Trigger to Identify Delayed Follow-up HbA1c Testing for Patients with Uncontrolled Diabetes.
J Gen Intern Med. 2022 Mar;37(4):928-934. doi: 10.1007/s11606-021-07224-3. Epub 2022 Jan 17.
10

本文引用的文献

2
VA QUERI informatics paper: information technology for clinical guideline implementation: perceptions of multidisciplinary stakeholders.
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2005 Jan-Feb;12(1):64-71. doi: 10.1197/jamia.M1495. Epub 2004 Oct 18.
3
Diabetes care quality in the Veterans Affairs Health Care System and commercial managed care: the TRIAD study.
Ann Intern Med. 2004 Aug 17;141(4):272-81. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-141-4-200408170-00007.
6
Effects of computerized guidelines for managing heart disease in primary care.
J Gen Intern Med. 2003 Dec;18(12):967-76. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2003.30635.x.
7
Human factors barriers to the effective use of ten HIV clinical reminders.
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2004 Jan-Feb;11(1):50-9. doi: 10.1197/jamia.M1364. Epub 2003 Oct 5.
9
Ten commandments for effective clinical decision support: making the practice of evidence-based medicine a reality.
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2003 Nov-Dec;10(6):523-30. doi: 10.1197/jamia.M1370. Epub 2003 Aug 4.
10
Electronic technology: a spark to revitalize primary care?
JAMA. 2003 Jul 9;290(2):259-64. doi: 10.1001/jama.290.2.259.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验