Schittek Janda M, Tani Botticelli A, Mattheos N, Nebel D, Wagner A, Nattestad A, Attström R
Department of Periodontology and Centre for Educational Research and Technology, Centre for Oral Health Sciences, Malmö University, Malmö, Sweden.
Eur J Dent Educ. 2005 May;9(2):53-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0579.2004.00366.x.
Video-based instructions for clinical procedures have been used frequently during the preceding decades.
To investigate in a randomised controlled trial the learning effectiveness of fragmented videos vs. the complete sequential video and to analyse the attitudes of the user towards video as a learning aid.
An instructional video on surgical hand wash was produced. The video was available in two different forms in two separate web pages: one as a sequential video and one fragmented into eight short clips. Twenty-eight dental students in the second semester were randomised into an experimental (n = 15) and a control group (n = 13). The experimental group used the fragmented form of the video and the control group watched the complete one. The use of the videos was logged and the students were video taped whilst undertaking a test hand wash. The videos were analysed systematically and blindly by two independent clinicians. The students also performed a written test concerning learning outcome from the videos as well as they answered an attitude questionnaire.
The students in the experimental group watched the video significantly longer than the control group. There were no significant differences between the groups with regard to the ratings and scores when performing the hand wash. The experimental group had significantly better results in the written test compared with those of the control group. There was no significant difference between the groups with regard to attitudes towards the use of video for learning, as measured by the Visual Analogue Scales. Most students in both groups expressed satisfaction with the use of video for learning.
The students demonstrated positive attitudes and acceptable learning outcome from viewing CAL videos as a part of their pre-clinical training. Videos that are part of computer-based learning settings would ideally be presented to the students both as a segmented and as a whole video to give the students the option to choose the form of video which suits the individual student's learning style.
在过去几十年中,基于视频的临床操作指导已被频繁使用。
在一项随机对照试验中,研究碎片化视频与完整顺序视频的学习效果,并分析用户对视频作为学习辅助工具的态度。
制作了一部关于外科洗手的教学视频。该视频在两个不同的网页上以两种不同的形式呈现:一种是顺序视频,另一种被分割成八个短片。将28名第二学期的牙科学生随机分为实验组(n = 15)和对照组(n = 13)。实验组使用视频的碎片化形式,对照组观看完整视频。记录视频的使用情况,并在学生进行测试洗手时对他们进行录像。由两名独立的临床医生对视频进行系统且盲法分析。学生们还进行了关于视频学习成果的书面测试,并回答了一份态度问卷。
实验组的学生观看视频的时间明显长于对照组。在进行洗手操作时,两组在评分和得分方面没有显著差异。与对照组相比,实验组在书面测试中的成绩明显更好。通过视觉模拟量表测量,两组在对视频用于学习的态度方面没有显著差异。两组中的大多数学生都对使用视频进行学习表示满意。
作为临床前培训的一部分,学生通过观看计算机辅助学习(CAL)视频表现出积极的态度和可接受的学习成果。作为基于计算机学习环境一部分的视频,理想情况下应同时以分段和完整视频的形式呈现给学生,以便让学生能够选择适合个人学习风格的视频形式。