Savage Ruth
New Zealand Pharmacovigilance Centre, Department of Preventive and Social Medicine, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand.
Drugs Aging. 2005;22(3):185-200. doi: 10.2165/00002512-200522030-00001.
Chronic pain in the elderly is frequently a result of arthritic disorders, particularly osteoarthritis. The cyclo-oxygenase (COX)-2 inhibitors are as effective as standard NSAIDs for the relief of pain and for improving function in elderly patients with osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis. COX-2 inhibitors increase the risk of serious gastroduodenal adverse reactions but there is evidence that they carry a lower risk for these adverse effects than standard NSAIDs, except when there is concurrent aspirin use. Since gastroduodenal disorders are the most frequently reported serious adverse effects of NSAIDs and these disorders occur more frequently in the elderly, COX-2 inhibitors offer an alternative to standard NSAIDs in this age group. However, they are not appropriate for many patients with cardiovascular and renal disease. The adverse reaction profile of the COX-2 inhibitors has confirmed the role of the COX-2 enzyme in renal function, salt and water homeostasis and the vascular endothelium. Thus, like standard NSAIDs, COX-2 inhibitors can cause renal failure, hypertension and exacerbation of cardiac failure. Of note is that these disorders are dose related. Thus, there are good reasons to avoid high doses of COX-2 inhibitors in the elderly. Clinical trials indicate that daily doses of rofecoxib 12.5 mg, celecoxib 100-200 mg, valdecoxib 10mg and etoricoxib 60 mg are the minimum effective doses of these agents. Data from the New Zealand Intensive Medicines Monitoring Programme indicate that celecoxib 200 mg/day and rofecoxib 25 mg/day are/were the most commonly prescribed doses and that 6% of patients had taken rofecoxib 50 mg/day for longer than recommended. Recent research indicates that COX-2 inhibitors have a thrombotic potential, especially in high doses and when use is prolonged, and this further limits the extent to which they can be used in the elderly. Important interactions with COX-2 inhibitors in the elderly include those with warfarin, which can result in loss of control of anticoagulation, and those with ACE inhibitors, angiotensin II type 1 receptor antagonists and diuretics, which can result in loss of control of blood pressure and cardiac failure and, in hypovolaemic conditions, renal failure. The clinical significance of an interaction between celecoxib and aspirin to reduce the antiplatelet effect of the latter drug is unknown. Preliminary information from spontaneous reporting systems indicates that there may be differences in the risk of cardiac failure and hypertension between standard NSAIDs and COX-2 inhibitors and between rofecoxib and celecoxib. More formal studies using equivalent doses are needed to test this observation. Use of COX-2 inhibitors may be considered in the elderly to reduce the risk of gastroduodenal complications associated with standard NSAIDs but only when consideration has first been given to use of less toxic medicines as alternatives or supplements, the appropriate dose of the COX-2 inhibitor or standard NSAID, the presence and possible impact of co-morbidities, and the implications of taking COX-2 inhibitors with any concomitant medications. Equally important is regular monitoring of the patient taking a COX-2 inhibitor for efficacy and adverse effects, and ensuring that the patient has a continuing need to keep taking the drug. Close attention also needs to be paid to intercurrent illnesses and new prescriptions that may reduce the safety of the COX-2 inhibitor. A standard NSAID plus a proton pump inhibitor may be equally effective as a COX-2 inhibitor in reducing the risk of gastroduodenal toxicity and if used the same prescribing advice applies. Current knowledge concerning the thrombotic potential of COX-2 inhibitors suggests that this combination, if tolerated, may be preferable to a COX-2 inhibitor, particularly where prolonged use is required. This knowledge also indicates that for patients with or at high risk of ischaemic heart disease or stroke, COX-2 inhibitors are contraindicated.
老年人的慢性疼痛通常是关节炎疾病的结果,尤其是骨关节炎。环氧化酶(COX)-2抑制剂在缓解骨关节炎和类风湿关节炎老年患者的疼痛及改善功能方面与标准非甾体抗炎药(NSAIDs)同样有效。COX-2抑制剂会增加严重胃十二指肠不良反应的风险,但有证据表明,与标准NSAIDs相比,它们出现这些不良反应的风险更低,除非同时使用阿司匹林。由于胃十二指肠疾病是NSAIDs最常报告的严重不良反应,且这些疾病在老年人中更常见,因此COX-2抑制剂为该年龄组的患者提供了一种替代标准NSAIDs的选择。然而,它们并不适用于许多患有心血管疾病和肾脏疾病的患者。COX-2抑制剂的不良反应特征证实了COX-2酶在肾功能、盐和水平衡以及血管内皮中的作用。因此,与标准NSAIDs一样,COX-2抑制剂可导致肾衰竭、高血压和心力衰竭加重。值得注意的是,这些疾病与剂量相关。因此,有充分理由避免在老年人中使用高剂量的COX-2抑制剂。临床试验表明,罗非昔布每日12.5毫克、塞来昔布100 - 200毫克、伐地昔布10毫克和依托考昔60毫克是这些药物的最低有效剂量。来自新西兰强化药物监测计划的数据表明,塞来昔布每日200毫克和罗非昔布每日25毫克是/曾是最常用的处方剂量,且6%的患者服用罗非昔布每日50毫克的时间超过了推荐时间。最近的研究表明,COX-2抑制剂具有血栓形成潜力,尤其是在高剂量和长期使用时,这进一步限制了它们在老年人中的使用范围。老年人中与COX-2抑制剂的重要相互作用包括与华法林的相互作用,这可能导致抗凝失控,以及与血管紧张素转换酶(ACE)抑制剂、血管紧张素II 1型受体拮抗剂和利尿剂的相互作用,这可能导致血压和心力衰竭失控,在低血容量情况下还可能导致肾衰竭。塞来昔布与阿司匹林之间相互作用降低后者抗血小板作用的临床意义尚不清楚。自发报告系统的初步信息表明,标准NSAIDs与COX-2抑制剂之间以及罗非昔布与塞来昔布之间在心力衰竭和高血压风险方面可能存在差异。需要进行更多使用等效剂量的正式研究来验证这一观察结果。在老年人中使用COX-2抑制剂可考虑降低与标准NSAIDs相关的胃十二指肠并发症风险,但前提是首先要考虑使用毒性较小的药物作为替代或补充、COX-2抑制剂或标准NSAIDs的适当剂量、合并症的存在及其可能的影响,以及服用COX-2抑制剂与任何伴随药物的影响。同样重要的是定期监测服用COX-2抑制剂的患者的疗效和不良反应,并确保患者持续需要服用该药物。还需要密切关注可能降低COX-2抑制剂安全性的并发疾病和新处方。标准NSAIDs加质子泵抑制剂在降低胃十二指肠毒性风险方面可能与COX-2抑制剂同样有效,如果使用,同样适用相同的处方建议。关于COX-2抑制剂血栓形成潜力的现有知识表明,如果耐受,这种组合可能比COX-2抑制剂更可取,特别是在需要长期使用的情况下。这一知识还表明,对于患有缺血性心脏病或中风或处于高风险的患者,COX-2抑制剂是禁忌的。