Pneumatic balloon dilatation in primary achalasia: the long-term follow-up results.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Pneumatic dilatation is a safe and most effective treatment for achalasia. We analyzed the long-term results of pneumatic dilatation in primary achalasia by objective and subjective findings.

METHODOLOGY

Pneumatic dilatation was performed in patients that were diagnosed with primary achalasia in our manometry laboratory between 1993-1999 years. We evaluated patients with clinical, radiologic, endoscopic and manometric results before treatment. Mean esophageal diameters on the level of the lower esophageal sphincter and middle esophagus were measured by barium esophagograms. The patients were clinically reevaluated after one week and barium esophagograms were repeated one month later after dilatation. Clinical examination, endoscopy and manometry were done at 1, 3, 6 and 12 months and repeated yearly for follow-up period. A statistical comparison of pre- and posttreatment on the frequency of dysphagia, radiological diameter of the esophagus and manometric data was performed using unpaired t tests and chi2 tests.

RESULTS

Pneumatic dilatation was performed on 50 adult patients with a mean age 41.42+/-18.07 years. A single dilatation was successful in forty patients (80%) and two to three dilatations were performed in ten (20%) patients. The median number of dilatations was 1.26. In the postdilatation period, mean short-term (< 1 year) and long-term (2-7 years) clinical improvement was 82.8% and 66.85% respectively. The mean diameter of the esophagus was regressed to 26.51+/-7.69 mm from 36.66+/-11.23 mm (p<0.001) and the mean diameter of the lower esophageal sphincter was increased to 8.38+/-3.12 mm from 2.58+/-1.13 mm (p<0.001) with pneumatic dilatation. The mean pretreatment pressure of lower esophageal sphincter was 41.14+/-11.34 mmHg and these values were 18.79+/-7.85 mmHg (p<0.001), 13.18+/-9.53 mmHg (p<0.001) in the 1st, and 5th years of the posttreatment period, respectively. The mean pressure of the lower esophageal sphincter was 31.78+/-8.91 mmHg in nonresponder patients during the posttreatment period; there was no significant difference prior to pneumatic dilatation (p>0.1). Surgical operation was performed on 5 patients (10%), who had no benefit from pneumatic dilatation.

CONCLUSIONS

Pneumatic dilatation is an effective procedure in the treatment of primary achalasia during the short- and long-term period. Treatment evaluation can possibly be made objectively with radiographic and manometric alterations of esophagus that occurred after pneumatic dilatation.