Zhou Fu-Ling, Zhang Wang-Gang, Wei Yong-Chang, Xu Kang-Ling, Hui Ling-Yun, Wang Xu-Sheng, Li Ming-Zhong
Department of Hematology and Oncology, Second Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an 710004, Shaanxi Province, China.
World J Gastroenterol. 2005 Apr 21;11(15):2313-8. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v11.i15.2313.
A study was performed to investigate the impact of comorbid anxiety and depression (CAD) on quality of life (QOL) and cellular immunity changes in patients with digestive tract cancers.
One hundred and fifty-six cases of both sexes with cancers of the digestive tract admitted between March 2001 and February 2004 in the Department of Medical Oncology, First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University were randomly enrolled in the study. Depressive and anxiety disorder diagnoses were assessed by using the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV. All adult patients were evaluated with the Hamilton depressive scale (HAMD, the 24-item version), the Hamilton anxiety scale (HAMA, a modified 14-item version), quality of life questionnaire-core 30 (QLQ-C30), social support rating scale (SSRS), simple coping style questionnaire (SCSQ), and other questionnaires, respectively. In terms of HAMD > or = 20 and HAMA > or = 14, the patients were categorized, including CAD (n = 31) in group A, anxiety disorder (n = 23) in group B, depressive disorder (n = 37) in group C, and non-disorder (n = 65) in group D. Immunological parameters such as T-lymphocyte subsets and natural killer (NK) cell activities in peripheral blood were determined and compared among the four groups.
The incidence of CAD was 21.15% in patients with digestive tract cancers. The average scores of social support was 43.67+/-7.05 for 156 cases, active coping 20.34+/-7.33, and passive coping 9.55+/-5.51. Compared with group D, subjective support was enhanced slightly in group A, but social support, objective support, and utilization of support reduced, especially utilization of support with significance (6.16 vs 7.80, P<0.05); total scores of active coping decreased, while passive coping reversed; granulocytes proliferated, monocytes declined, and lymphocytes declined significantly (32.87 vs 34.00, P<0.05); moreover, the percentage of CD3, CD4, CD8 and CD56 in T lymphocyte subsets was in lower level, respectively, and CD56 showed a significant decline in group A (26.02 vs 32.20, P<0.05), however, CD4/CD8 ratio increased. Physical function, role function, fatigue, sleeplessness and constipation had significant changes among different groups by one-way ANOVA, and group A was in poor QOL. It revealed that global health-related quality of life (QL) were positively correlated with active coping and CD56; CAD was negatively correlated with QL, active coping and CD56. Furthermore, the step-wise regression analysis suggested that utilization of support, CD56, active coping, fatigue, sleeplessness and depression were significant factors contributing to QOL.
CAD, which can impair QOL and cellular immunity, occurs with a higher incidence in patients with digestive tract cancers. Hence, it is essential to improve mental health for them with specifically tailored interventions.
进行一项研究以调查共病焦虑和抑郁(CAD)对消化道癌症患者生活质量(QOL)及细胞免疫变化的影响。
随机纳入2001年3月至2004年2月在西安交通大学第一附属医院肿瘤内科住院的156例消化道癌症患者。采用《精神障碍诊断与统计手册》第四版(DSM-IV)的结构化临床访谈评估抑郁和焦虑障碍诊断。所有成年患者分别使用汉密尔顿抑郁量表(HAMD,24项版本)、汉密尔顿焦虑量表(HAMA,改良的14项版本)、生活质量问卷核心30项(QLQ-C30)、社会支持评定量表(SSRS)、简易应对方式问卷(SCSQ)及其他问卷进行评估。根据HAMD≥20分和HAMA≥14分对患者进行分类,包括A组CAD患者(n = 31)、B组焦虑障碍患者(n = 23)、C组抑郁障碍患者(n = 37)和D组无障碍患者(n = 65)。测定并比较四组外周血中T淋巴细胞亚群和自然杀伤(NK)细胞活性等免疫参数。
消化道癌症患者中CAD的发生率为21.15%。156例患者的社会支持平均得分为43.67±7.05,积极应对得分为20.34±7.33,消极应对得分为9.55±5.51。与D组相比,A组主观支持略有增强,但社会支持、客观支持及支持利用度降低,尤其是支持利用度差异有统计学意义(6.16对7.80,P<0.05);积极应对总分下降,消极应对则相反;粒细胞增多,单核细胞减少,淋巴细胞显著减少(32.87对34.00,P<0.05);此外,T淋巴细胞亚群中CD3、CD4、CD8和CD56的百分比均较低水平,且A组CD56显著下降(26.02对32.20,P<0.05),然而CD4/CD8比值升高。通过单因素方差分析,不同组间身体功能、角色功能、疲劳、失眠和便秘有显著变化,A组生活质量较差。结果显示,总体健康相关生活质量(QL)与积极应对及CD56呈正相关;CAD与QL、积极应对及CD56呈负相关。此外,逐步回归分析表明,支持利用度、CD56、积极应对、疲劳、失眠和抑郁是影响生活质量的重要因素。
CAD在消化道癌症患者中发生率较高,可损害生活质量和细胞免疫。因此,通过针对性干预改善他们的心理健康至关重要。