• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

出于法律目的测量血液和呼气中的乙醇:实验室之间以及呼气测试仪器之间的差异

Measuring ethanol in blood and breath for legal purposes: variability between laboratories and between breath-test instruments.

作者信息

Jones A W, Beylich K M, Bjørneboe A, Ingum J, Mørland J

机构信息

Department of Alcohol Toxicology, National Laboratory of Forensic Chemistry, University Hospital, Linköping, Sweden.

出版信息

Clin Chem. 1992 May;38(5):743-7.

PMID:1582028
Abstract

We determined the concentrations of ethanol in nearly simultaneous specimens of venous blood (BAC) and end-expired breath (BrAC) after healthy volunteers drank moderate amounts of alcohol. BAC was measured at two laboratories and BrAC was analyzed with two instruments (Intoxilyzer 5000) from the same manufacturer. The mean difference in BAC between laboratories was 0.0105 mg/g (SD 0.0219); 95% of the differences ranged from -0.0333 to 0.0543 mg/g. The mean difference in BrAC between instruments was 0.0153 mg/L (SD 0.0136), and 95% of the differences ranged from -0.0119 to 0.0425 mg/L. The coefficient of variation (CV) between laboratories was 2.9% compared with 4.5% between breath-test instruments. Venous BAC (y) and BrAC (x) were highly correlated (r = 0.978). However, when the Intoxilyzer instruments indicated that BrAC had reached zero, the actual BAC was 0.135 mg/g, according to the average forensic laboratory reports. The Intoxilyzer 5000 breath analyzers used in this study seem to have a constant analytical bias.

摘要

我们测定了健康志愿者饮用适量酒精后几乎同时采集的静脉血样本(血液酒精浓度,BAC)和终末呼气样本(呼气酒精浓度,BrAC)中的乙醇浓度。血液酒精浓度在两个实验室进行测量,呼气酒精浓度使用同一制造商生产的两台仪器(Intoxilyzer 5000)进行分析。实验室之间血液酒精浓度的平均差异为0.0105 mg/g(标准差0.0219);95%的差异范围在-0.0333至0.0543 mg/g之间。仪器之间呼气酒精浓度的平均差异为0.0153 mg/L(标准差0.0136),95%的差异范围在-0.0119至0.0425 mg/L之间。实验室之间的变异系数(CV)为2.9%,而呼气测试仪器之间为4.5%。静脉血血液酒精浓度(y)和呼气酒精浓度(x)高度相关(r = 0.978)。然而,根据法医实验室的平均报告,当Intoxilyzer仪器显示呼气酒精浓度达到零时,实际血液酒精浓度为0.135 mg/g。本研究中使用的Intoxilyzer 5000呼气分析仪似乎存在恒定的分析偏差。

相似文献

1
Measuring ethanol in blood and breath for legal purposes: variability between laboratories and between breath-test instruments.出于法律目的测量血液和呼气中的乙醇:实验室之间以及呼气测试仪器之间的差异
Clin Chem. 1992 May;38(5):743-7.
2
Comparison of ethanol concentrations in venous blood and end-expired breath during a controlled drinking study.一项控制性饮酒研究中静脉血与终末呼气乙醇浓度的比较。
Forensic Sci Int. 2003 Mar 12;132(1):18-25. doi: 10.1016/s0379-0738(02)00417-6.
3
Breath alcohol concentration determined with a new analyzer using free exhalation predicts almost precisely the arterial blood alcohol concentration.使用新型分析仪通过自由呼气测定的呼气酒精浓度几乎能精确预测动脉血酒精浓度。
Forensic Sci Int. 2007 May 24;168(2-3):200-7. doi: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2006.07.018. Epub 2006 Sep 15.
4
Comparison of breath-alcohol screening test results with venous blood alcohol concentration in suspected drunken drivers.疑似醉酒司机呼气酒精筛查测试结果与静脉血酒精浓度的比较。
Forensic Sci Int. 2014 Jun;239:57-61. doi: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2014.03.019. Epub 2014 Mar 26.
5
New Zealand's breath and blood alcohol testing programs: further data analysis and forensic implications.新西兰的呼吸和血液酒精检测项目:进一步的数据分析及法医学意义
Forensic Sci Int. 2008 Jul 4;178(2-3):83-92. doi: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2008.02.005. Epub 2008 Mar 26.
6
The relationship of normal body temperature, end-expired breath temperature, and BAC/BrAC ratio in 98 physically fit human test subjects.98 名身体状况良好的人体测试对象的正常体温、呼气末温度与 BAC/BrAC 比值的关系。
J Anal Toxicol. 2010 Jun;34(5):238-42. doi: 10.1093/jat/34.5.238.
7
Examination of some performance characteristics of breath alcohol measurements obtained with the intoxilyzer 8000C following social drinking conditions.检查在社交饮酒条件下使用 intoxilyzer 8000C 获得的呼气酒精测量的一些性能特征。
J Anal Toxicol. 2009 Oct;33(8):514-20. doi: 10.1093/jat/33.8.514.
8
Variability of the blood/breath alcohol ratio in drinking drivers.酒驾者血液/呼气酒精比率的变异性。
J Forensic Sci. 1996 Nov;41(6):916-21.
9
Assessment of the breath alcohol concentration in emergency care patients with different level of consciousness.对不同意识水平的急诊患者呼气酒精浓度的评估。
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2015 Feb 6;23:11. doi: 10.1186/s13049-014-0082-y.
10
A large-scale study of the relationship between blood and breath alcohol concentrations in New Zealand drinking drivers.新西兰酒驾司机血液酒精浓度与呼气酒精浓度关系的大规模研究。
J Forensic Sci. 2006 Jan;51(1):173-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1556-4029.2005.00029.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Poor correlation between alcohol concentration in oral fluid and breath in subjects consuming beverages immediately before testing.在测试前立即饮用饮料的受试者中,口腔液和呼气中的酒精浓度相关性较差。
Biochem Med (Zagreb). 2022 Feb 15;32(1):010902. doi: 10.11613/BM.2022.010902. Epub 2021 Dec 15.
2
Measurement of ethanol in gaseous breath using a miniature gas chromatograph.使用微型气相色谱仪测量气态呼吸中的乙醇。
J Anal Toxicol. 2011 Apr;35(3):134-42. doi: 10.1093/anatox/35.3.134.
3
Alcohol absorption modification after a laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy due to obesity.
腹腔镜袖状胃切除术治疗肥胖症后的酒精吸收改变。
Obes Surg. 2010 Jun;20(6):744-8. doi: 10.1007/s11695-010-0136-9.
4
The effect of acute ethanol challenge on global visuospatial attention: exaggeration of leftward bias in line bisection.急性乙醇暴露对整体视空间注意力的影响:在二分线任务中夸大左偏。
Laterality. 2010 May;15(3):327-42. doi: 10.1080/13576500902781745. Epub 2009 Mar 25.
5
The clinical significance of variations in ethanol toxicokinetics.乙醇毒代动力学变异的临床意义。
J Med Toxicol. 2007 Jun;3(2):63-72. doi: 10.1007/BF03160911.
6
Concentration dependency of the BAC/BrAC (blood alcohol concentration/breath alcohol concentration) conversion factor during the linear elimination phase.线性消除阶段血液酒精浓度/呼气酒精浓度(BAC/BrAC)转换因子的浓度依赖性
Int J Legal Med. 2003 Oct;117(5):276-81. doi: 10.1007/s00414-003-0384-5. Epub 2003 Jul 5.
7
Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic principles of illicit drug use and treatment of illicit drug users.非法药物使用的药代动力学和药效学原理以及非法药物使用者的治疗
Clin Pharmacokinet. 1997 Nov;33(5):344-400. doi: 10.2165/00003088-199733050-00003.