Philips H C, Fenster H N, Samsom D
Psychology Department, University Hospital, Vancouver, B.C., Canada.
J Behav Med. 1992 Feb;15(1):45-63. doi: 10.1007/BF00848377.
Twenty women diagnosed with functional urinary incoordination were randomly assigned to one of two treatment groups: biofeedback or progressive muscle relaxation. Ten subjects who were placed on a waiting list prior to treatment allocation served as a comparison group. The biofeedback intervention focused specifically on retraining of pelvic floor musculature (PFM). Patients were assessed pretreatment, posttreatment, and at 2-month follow-up. Outcome measures included self-reported symptomatology, psychological functioning, psychophysiological assessment of the PFM, and urologist ratings of problem severity and treatment efficacy. Both treatment approaches proved effective in improving symptomatology and psychological state. Subjects on the waiting list demonstrated no change in urological difficulties. No differences were found between the two treatment groups on any of the outcome measures. Theoretical and practical implications of the results are discussed.
生物反馈组或渐进性肌肉松弛组。在治疗分配前被列入等候名单的十名受试者作为对照组。生物反馈干预特别侧重于盆底肌肉组织(PFM)的再训练。对患者在治疗前、治疗后以及2个月随访时进行评估。结果指标包括自我报告的症状、心理功能、PFM的心理生理评估以及泌尿科医生对问题严重程度和治疗效果的评分。两种治疗方法在改善症状和心理状态方面均被证明有效。等候名单上的受试者在泌尿系统问题上没有变化。在任何结果指标上,两个治疗组之间均未发现差异。讨论了结果的理论和实际意义。