• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Variations in unconditioned stimulus processing in unblocking.解除阻断中无条件刺激加工的变化。
J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 2005 Apr;31(2):155-71. doi: 10.1037/0097-7403.31.2.155.
2
Effects of amygdala central nucleus lesions on blocking and unblocking.杏仁核中央核损伤对阻断和解除阻断的影响。
Behav Neurosci. 1993 Apr;107(2):235-45. doi: 10.1037//0735-7044.107.2.235.
3
Enhanced conditioning produced by surprising increases in reinforcer value are unaffected by lesions of the amygdala central nucleus.强化物价值意外增加所产生的增强性条件作用不受杏仁核中央核损伤的影响。
Neurobiol Learn Mem. 2006 Jan;85(1):30-5. doi: 10.1016/j.nlm.2005.07.001. Epub 2005 Aug 15.
4
The effects of basolateral amygdala lesions on unblocking.基底外侧杏仁核损伤对解除阻断的影响。
Behav Neurosci. 2012 Apr;126(2):279-89. doi: 10.1037/a0027576.
5
Neurotoxic lesions of basolateral, but not central, amygdala interfere with Pavlovian second-order conditioning and reinforcer devaluation effects.基底外侧杏仁核而非中央杏仁核的神经毒性损伤会干扰巴甫洛夫二阶条件反射和强化物贬值效应。
J Neurosci. 1996 Aug 15;16(16):5256-65. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.16-16-05256.1996.
6
Amygdala central nucleus lesions disrupt increments, but not decrements, in conditioned stimulus processing.杏仁核中央核损伤会破坏条件刺激处理过程中的增强,但不会破坏减弱。
Behav Neurosci. 1993 Apr;107(2):246-53. doi: 10.1037//0735-7044.107.2.246.
7
Reinforcer-specificity of appetitive and consummatory behavior of rats after Pavlovian conditioning with food reinforcers.用食物强化物进行巴甫洛夫条件反射后大鼠食欲和满足行为的强化物特异性。
Physiol Behav. 2007 May 16;91(1):95-105. doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2007.01.021. Epub 2007 Feb 8.
8
Enhanced unblocking from sustained post-trial surprise.试验后持续惊讶带来的强化解除阻塞。
J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 2013 Oct;39(4):311-22. doi: 10.1037/a0032569. Epub 2013 May 20.
9
Unblocking in Pavlovian appetitive conditioning.经典性条件性食欲条件反射中的解除阻断
J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 1984 Oct;10(4):476-97.
10
Acquisition of instrumental conditioned reinforcement is resistant to the devaluation of the unconditioned stimulus.工具性条件强化的习得对无条件刺激的贬值具有抗性。
Q J Exp Psychol B. 2005 Jan;58(1):19-30. doi: 10.1080/02724990444000023.

引用本文的文献

1
A systems-neuroscience model of phasic dopamine.相位多巴胺的系统神经科学模型。
Psychol Rev. 2020 Nov;127(6):972-1021. doi: 10.1037/rev0000199. Epub 2020 Jun 11.
2
Optogenetic Blockade of Dopamine Transients Prevents Learning Induced by Changes in Reward Features.光遗传学阻断多巴胺瞬变可防止因奖励特征变化引起的学习。
Curr Biol. 2017 Nov 20;27(22):3480-3486.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2017.09.049. Epub 2017 Nov 2.
3
Dopamine transients are sufficient and necessary for acquisition of model-based associations.多巴胺瞬变对于基于模型的联想学习而言既是充分的也是必要的。
Nat Neurosci. 2017 May;20(5):735-742. doi: 10.1038/nn.4538. Epub 2017 Apr 3.
4
Effects of amygdala lesions on overexpectation phenomena in food cup approach and autoshaping procedures.杏仁核损伤对食物杯接近法和自动成型程序中过度期望现象的影响。
Behav Neurosci. 2016 Aug;130(4):357-75. doi: 10.1037/bne0000149. Epub 2016 May 12.
5
Mini-review: Prediction errors, attention and associative learning.小型综述:预测误差、注意力与联想学习
Neurobiol Learn Mem. 2016 May;131:207-15. doi: 10.1016/j.nlm.2016.02.014. Epub 2016 Mar 3.
6
Learning theory: a driving force in understanding orbitofrontal function.学习理论:理解眶额功能的驱动力。
Neurobiol Learn Mem. 2014 Feb;108:22-7. doi: 10.1016/j.nlm.2013.06.003. Epub 2013 Jun 14.
7
Role of amygdala central nucleus in feature negative discriminations.杏仁核中央核在特征负性辨别中的作用。
Behav Neurosci. 2012 Oct;126(5):670-80. doi: 10.1037/a0029600. Epub 2012 Aug 13.
8
Surprise! Neural correlates of Pearce-Hall and Rescorla-Wagner coexist within the brain.惊喜!Pearce-Hall 和 Rescorla-Wagner 的神经关联在大脑中共存。
Eur J Neurosci. 2012 Apr;35(7):1190-200. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2011.07986.x.
9
The effects of basolateral amygdala lesions on unblocking.基底外侧杏仁核损伤对解除阻断的影响。
Behav Neurosci. 2012 Apr;126(2):279-89. doi: 10.1037/a0027576.
10
Impact of size and delay on neural activity in the rat limbic corticostriatal system.大小和延迟对大鼠边缘皮质纹状体系统神经活动的影响。
Front Neurosci. 2011 Dec 7;5:130. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2011.00130. eCollection 2011.

本文引用的文献

1
A comparison of two methods of assessing representation-mediated food aversions based on shock or illness.基于电击或疾病对两种评估表征介导的食物厌恶方法的比较。
Learn Motiv. 2008 Nov;39(4):265-277. doi: 10.1016/j.lmot.2008.08.001.
2
Temporal coding in conditioned inhibition: analysis of associative structure of inhibition.条件性抑制中的时间编码:抑制性联想结构分析
J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 2004 Jul;30(3):190-202. doi: 10.1037/0097-7403.30.3.190.
3
The role of associative history in models of associative learning: a selective review and a hybrid model.联想历史在联想学习模型中的作用:选择性综述与混合模型
Q J Exp Psychol B. 2004 Jul;57(3):193-243. doi: 10.1080/02724990344000141.
4
Effects of hippocampal lesions in overshadowing and blocking procedures.
Behav Neurosci. 2003 Jun;117(3):650-6. doi: 10.1037/0735-7044.117.3.650.
5
Amount of training and stimulus salience affect associability changes in serial conditioning.
Behav Processes. 2002 Sep 30;59(3):169. doi: 10.1016/s0376-6357(02)00092-x.
6
Inhibitory learning tests of conditioned stimulus associability in rats with lesions of the amygdala central nucleus.杏仁核中央核损伤大鼠的条件刺激关联性抑制学习测试
Behav Neurosci. 2001 Oct;115(5):1154-8.
7
The influence of associability changes in negative patterning and other discriminations.
J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 2000 Oct;26(4):462-76. doi: 10.1037//0097-7403.26.4.462.
8
Neuronal coding of prediction errors.预测误差的神经元编码。
Annu Rev Neurosci. 2000;23:473-500. doi: 10.1146/annurev.neuro.23.1.473.
9
Blocking can occur without losses in attention in rats with selective removal of hippocampal cholinergic input.在选择性去除海马胆碱能输入的大鼠中,阻断可以在不损失注意力的情况下发生。
Behav Neurosci. 1999 Oct;113(5):881-90. doi: 10.1037//0735-7044.113.5.881.
10
Amygdala circuitry in attentional and representational processes.杏仁核神经回路在注意力和表征过程中的作用。
Trends Cogn Sci. 1999 Feb;3(2):65-73. doi: 10.1016/s1364-6613(98)01271-6.

解除阻断中无条件刺激加工的变化。

Variations in unconditioned stimulus processing in unblocking.

作者信息

Holland Peter C, Kenmuir Cynthia

机构信息

Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.

出版信息

J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 2005 Apr;31(2):155-71. doi: 10.1037/0097-7403.31.2.155.

DOI:10.1037/0097-7403.31.2.155
PMID:15839773
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1201525/
Abstract

Three experiments examined the mechanisms by which downward shifts in reinforcer value influence learning in appetitive unblocking procedures. The downward shift was accomplished by omitting the 2nd of a 2-reinforcer sequence (food-food or food-sucrose). Performance of normal rats was compared with that of rats with lesions of the central nucleus of the amygdala, which are thought to interfere with surprise-induced enhancements of event processing. The results suggested that, in normal rats, omission of the 2nd reinforcer enhanced processing of the 1st reinforcer rather than processing of the conditioned stimuli and that lesions of the central nucleus eliminated this enhancement. The roles of reinforcement error signals in conditioning are discussed.

摘要

三项实验研究了强化物价值向下转移在食欲性解除阻塞程序中影响学习的机制。通过省略二元强化物序列中的第二个强化物(食物-食物或食物-蔗糖)来实现向下转移。将正常大鼠的表现与杏仁核中央核受损的大鼠进行比较,据认为后者会干扰由意外引发的事件处理增强。结果表明,在正常大鼠中,省略第二个强化物增强了对第一个强化物的处理,而非对条件刺激的处理,并且中央核损伤消除了这种增强。文中讨论了强化误差信号在条件作用中的作用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1bee/1201525/5621e09439fc/nihms3441f8.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1bee/1201525/e6ed43147894/nihms3441f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1bee/1201525/b9d1ec4bdfcc/nihms3441f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1bee/1201525/0fc57c4ecd3a/nihms3441f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1bee/1201525/420c20432720/nihms3441f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1bee/1201525/9512c60025ca/nihms3441f5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1bee/1201525/5b77e611ef13/nihms3441f6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1bee/1201525/c34f6b567d63/nihms3441f7.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1bee/1201525/5621e09439fc/nihms3441f8.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1bee/1201525/e6ed43147894/nihms3441f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1bee/1201525/b9d1ec4bdfcc/nihms3441f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1bee/1201525/0fc57c4ecd3a/nihms3441f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1bee/1201525/420c20432720/nihms3441f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1bee/1201525/9512c60025ca/nihms3441f5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1bee/1201525/5b77e611ef13/nihms3441f6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1bee/1201525/c34f6b567d63/nihms3441f7.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1bee/1201525/5621e09439fc/nihms3441f8.jpg