• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

队列研究的批判性评价读者指南：2. 评估混杂因素的可能性。

Reader's guide to critical appraisal of cohort studies: 2. Assessing potential for confounding.

作者信息

Mamdani Muhammad, Sykora Kathy, Li Ping, Normand Sharon-Lise T, Streiner David L, Austin Peter C, Rochon Paula A, Anderson Geoffrey M

机构信息

Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto, ON Canada.

出版信息

BMJ. 2005 Apr 23;330(7497):960-2. doi: 10.1136/bmj.330.7497.960.

DOI:10.1136/bmj.330.7497.960
PMID:15845982
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC556348/
Abstract

Although confounding is an important problem of cohort studies, its effects can be minimised to enable valid comparison

摘要

尽管混杂是队列研究的一个重要问题，但其影响可以降至最低，以便进行有效的比较。

相似文献

1
Reader's guide to critical appraisal of cohort studies: 2. Assessing potential for confounding.队列研究的批判性评价读者指南：2. 评估混杂因素的可能性。
BMJ. 2005 Apr 23;330(7497):960-2. doi: 10.1136/bmj.330.7497.960.
2
Readers guide to critical appraisal of cohort studies: 3. Analytical strategies to reduce confounding.队列研究的批判性评价读者指南：3. 减少混杂因素的分析策略。
BMJ. 2005 Apr 30;330(7498):1021-3. doi: 10.1136/bmj.330.7498.1021.
3
Reader's guide to critical appraisal of cohort studies: 1. Role and design.队列研究的批判性评价读者指南：1. 作用与设计。
BMJ. 2005 Apr 16;330(7496):895-7. doi: 10.1136/bmj.330.7496.895.
4
On the estimation and use of propensity scores in case-control and case-cohort studies.关于病例对照研究和病例队列研究中倾向得分的估计与应用。
Am J Epidemiol. 2007 Aug 1;166(3):332-9. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwm069. Epub 2007 May 15.
5
[Shortly about cohort studies].[关于队列研究的简介]
Lakartidningen. 2006;103(12):943-4.
6
Supplementary data collection with case-cohort analysis to address potential confounding in a cohort study of thromboembolism in oral contraceptive initiators matched on claims-based propensity scores.采用病例队列分析进行补充数据收集，以解决在基于索赔倾向评分匹配的口服避孕药使用者血栓栓塞队列研究中潜在的混杂问题。
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2008 Mar;17(3):297-305. doi: 10.1002/pds.1554.
7
[Clinical practice guidelines: a reader's guide].
Rev Mal Respir. 2003 Dec;20(6 Pt 1):920-7.
8
Developing critical appraisal skills.培养批判性评估技能。
Prof Nurse. 1999 Sep;14(12):843-7.
9
Cohort studies: marching forward.队列研究：不断前进。
Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2006 Sep;1(5):1117-23. doi: 10.2215/CJN.00080106. Epub 2006 Aug 2.
10
Matching, an appealing method to avoid confounding?匹配，一种避免混杂的有吸引力的方法？
Nephron Clin Pract. 2011;118(4):c315-8. doi: 10.1159/000323136. Epub 2011 Feb 3.

引用本文的文献

1
Gaps in immunization coverage at school entry and after two years of school attendance among immigrant and refugee children in Ontario, Canada.加拿大安大略省移民和难民儿童入学时及入学两年后的免疫接种覆盖率差距。
PLoS One. 2025 Sep 9;20(9):e0330955. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0330955. eCollection 2025.
2
Guideline-directed medical therapy and in-hospital mortality in acute coronary syndrome patients with advanced renal dysfunction: analysis of two nationwide retrospective cohort studies.晚期肾功能不全急性冠状动脉综合征患者的指南导向药物治疗与住院死亡率：两项全国性回顾性队列研究分析
BMJ Open. 2025 Aug 26;15(8):e098195. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-098195.
3
Larger fruit consumption helps constipation patients: socioeconomic analysis from 2005 - 2010 NHANES matched cohorts.增加水果摄入量对便秘患者有益：基于2005 - 2010年美国国家健康与营养检查调查匹配队列的社会经济分析
Gastroenterol Hepatol Bed Bench. 2025;18(1):70-81. doi: 10.22037/ghfbb.v18i1.2997.
4
Comparative Risk of Major Bleeding With Concomitant Use of Oral Anticoagulants and Corticosteroid Bursts.口服抗凝剂与皮质类固醇冲击疗法联合使用时发生大出血的比较风险
Clin Transl Sci. 2025 Aug;18(8):e70311. doi: 10.1111/cts.70311.
5
Biometric Strategies to Improve Vaccine Immunogenicity and Effectiveness.提高疫苗免疫原性和有效性的生物识别策略。
Biomimetics (Basel). 2025 Jul 3;10(7):439. doi: 10.3390/biomimetics10070439.
6
An assessment of data quality and sociodemographic variation in health service utilisation of general practice, emergency department and admitted services in a New South Wales linked health data asset: a retrospective cohort study of Lumos.对新南威尔士州关联健康数据资产中全科医疗、急诊科和住院服务的医疗服务利用情况的数据质量和社会人口统计学差异进行评估：一项关于Lumos的回顾性队列研究。
BMJ Open. 2025 Jul 22;15(7):e102055. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2025-102055.
7
Retention in Opioid Agonist Therapy Among First Nations People.原住民接受阿片类激动剂治疗的留存情况。
JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Jun 2;8(6):e2518452. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.18452.
8
Association between statin use and cataract formation in a retrospective cohort study using Japanese health screening and claims data.一项利用日本健康筛查和理赔数据的回顾性队列研究中他汀类药物使用与白内障形成之间的关联。
Sci Rep. 2025 Apr 19;15(1):13594. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-97889-1.
9
Immune checkpoint inhibitors and myocarditis in advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a nationwide cohort study.免疫检查点抑制剂与晚期非小细胞肺癌中的心肌炎：一项全国性队列研究
Cardiooncology. 2025 Mar 31;11(1):33. doi: 10.1186/s40959-025-00325-6.
10
Clinical outcomes of His bundle pacing vs. right ventricular pacing in patients with conduction disturbances following transcatheter aortic valve replacement.经导管主动脉瓣置换术后传导障碍患者希氏束起搏与右心室起搏的临床结局
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2025 Mar 20;25(1):202. doi: 10.1186/s12872-025-04643-6.

本文引用的文献

1
Readers guide to critical appraisal of cohort studies: 3. Analytical strategies to reduce confounding.队列研究的批判性评价读者指南：3. 减少混杂因素的分析策略。
BMJ. 2005 Apr 30;330(7498):1021-3. doi: 10.1136/bmj.330.7498.1021.
2
Reader's guide to critical appraisal of cohort studies: 1. Role and design.队列研究的批判性评价读者指南：1. 作用与设计。
BMJ. 2005 Apr 16;330(7496):895-7. doi: 10.1136/bmj.330.7496.895.
3
Association between SSRI use and hip fractures and the effect of residual confounding bias in claims database studies.选择性5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂（SSRI）的使用与髋部骨折之间的关联以及索赔数据库研究中残余混杂偏倚的影响。
J Clin Psychopharmacol. 2004 Dec;24(6):632-8. doi: 10.1097/01.jcp.0000145344.76288.39.
4
Association between falls in elderly women and chronic diseases and drug use: cross sectional study.老年女性跌倒与慢性病及药物使用之间的关联：横断面研究。
BMJ. 2003 Sep 27;327(7417):712-7. doi: 10.1136/bmj.327.7417.712.
5
Central nervous system active medications and risk for fractures in older women.中枢神经系统活性药物与老年女性骨折风险
Arch Intern Med. 2003 Apr 28;163(8):949-57. doi: 10.1001/archinte.163.8.949.
6
Walking and leisure-time activity and risk of hip fracture in postmenopausal women.绝经后女性的步行及休闲活动与髋部骨折风险
JAMA. 2002 Nov 13;288(18):2300-6. doi: 10.1001/jama.288.18.2300.
7
Postmenopausal hormone replacement therapy and the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease.绝经后激素替代疗法与心血管疾病的一级预防
Ann Intern Med. 2002 Aug 20;137(4):273-84. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-137-4-200208200-00012.
8
Clinical risk factors for hip fracture in elderly women: a case-control study.
J Orthop Trauma. 2002 Jul;16(6):379-85. doi: 10.1097/00005131-200207000-00003.
9
Epidemiology of falls.跌倒的流行病学
Age Ageing. 2001 Nov;30 Suppl 4:3-7. doi: 10.1093/ageing/30.suppl_4.3.
10
The revised CONSORT statement for reporting randomized trials: explanation and elaboration.报告随机试验的修订版CONSORT声明：解释与详述。
Ann Intern Med. 2001 Apr 17;134(8):663-94. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-134-8-200104170-00012.