Price Cathy J, Devlin Joseph T, Moore Caroline J, Morton Christopher, Laird Angela R
Wellcome Department of Imaging Neuroscience, Institute of Neurology, London, United Kingdom.
Hum Brain Mapp. 2005 May;25(1):70-82. doi: 10.1002/hbm.20132.
The neural systems sustaining object naming were examined using the activation likelihood estimation (ALE) meta-analysis approach on the results of 16 previously published studies. The activation task in each study required subjects to name pictures of objects or animals, but the baseline tasks varied. Separate meta-analyses were carried out on studies that used: (1) high-level baselines to control for speech processing and visual input; and (2) low-level baselines that did not control for speech or complex visual processing. The results of the two meta-analyses were then compared directly, revealing a double dissociation in the activation pattern for studies using high and low baselines. To interpret the differential activations, we report two new functional imaging experiments. The aim of the first was to characterize activation differences associated with visual stimuli that are typically used in baseline conditions (complex visual features, simple structures, or fixation). The aim of the second was to classify object-naming regions in terms of whether they were engaged preferentially by semantic or phonological processes. The results reveal a remarkably precise correspondence between the areas identified by the meta-analyses as affected differentially by baseline and the areas that are affected differentially by non-object structure, semantics or phonology. As expected, high-level baselines reduced object-naming activation in areas associated with the processing of complex visual features and speech production. In addition, high-level baselines increased sensitivity to activation in areas associated with semantic processing, visual-speech integration and response selection. For example, activation in the anterior temporal areas that neuropsychological studies have associated with semantic processing was more strongly activated in the context of high-level baselines. These results therefore have implications for understanding the convergence of functional imaging and neuropsychological findings.
我们采用激活似然估计(ALE)元分析方法,基于16项先前发表研究的结果,对支持物体命名的神经系统进行了研究。每项研究中的激活任务要求受试者说出物体或动物的图片名称,但基线任务各不相同。我们对使用以下两种情况的研究分别进行了元分析:(1)用于控制言语处理和视觉输入的高级基线;(2)未控制言语或复杂视觉处理的低级基线。然后直接比较了这两种元分析的结果,发现在使用高基线和低基线的研究中,激活模式存在双重解离。为了解释不同的激活情况,我们报告了两项新的功能成像实验。第一个实验的目的是描述与基线条件下通常使用的视觉刺激(复杂视觉特征、简单结构或注视)相关的激活差异。第二个实验的目的是根据物体命名区域是优先参与语义还是语音过程进行分类排序。结果显示,元分析确定的受基线差异影响的区域与受非物体结构、语义或语音差异影响的区域之间存在非常精确的对应关系。正如预期的那样,高级基线降低了与复杂视觉特征处理和言语产生相关区域的物体命名激活。此外,高级基线提高了与语义处理、视觉-言语整合和反应选择相关区域对激活的敏感性。例如,神经心理学研究认为与语义处理相关的颞前区在高级基线背景下的激活更强。因此,这些结果对于理解功能成像和神经心理学研究结果的趋同具有重要意义。