Hamberger Marla J, Habeck Christian G, Pantazatos Spiro P, Williams Alicia C, Hirsch Joy
Department of Neurology, Columbia University Medical Center, New York.
Hum Brain Mapp. 2014 Jun;35(6):2507-20. doi: 10.1002/hbm.22345. Epub 2013 Aug 6.
Historically, both clinicians and cognitive scientists have used visual object naming measures to study naming, and lesion-type studies have implicated the left posterior, temporo-parietal region as a critical component of naming circuitry. However, recent results from behavioral and cortical stimulation studies using auditory description naming as well as visual object naming in left temporal lobe epilepsy patients suggest that discrete sites in anterior temporal cortex are critical for description naming, whereas posterior temporal regions mediate both visual object naming and description naming. To determine whether this task specificity reflects normal cerebral organization and processing, 13 healthy adults performed description naming and visual naming during functional neuroimaging. In addition to standard univariate analysis, multivariate, ordinal trend analysis examined the network character of the regions involved in task-specific naming. Univariate analysis indicated posterior temporal activation for both visual naming and description naming, whereas multivariate analysis revealed broader networks for both tasks, with both overlapping and task-specific regions, as well as task-related differences in the way the tasks utilized common regions. Additionally, multivariate analysis revealed unique, task-specific, regionally covarying activation patterns that were strikingly consistent in all 13 subjects for visual naming and 12/13 subjects for description naming. Results suggest a common neural substrate, yet differentiable neural processes underlying visual naming and description naming in neurologically intact individuals. These findings support the use of both types of tasks for clinical assessment and may have application in the treatment of neurologically based naming deficits. Inc.
从历史上看,临床医生和认知科学家都使用视觉物体命名测量方法来研究命名,并且病灶类型研究表明左后颞顶叶区域是命名回路的关键组成部分。然而,最近对左颞叶癫痫患者进行的行为和皮层刺激研究结果显示,使用听觉描述命名以及视觉物体命名时,颞叶前部的离散部位对描述命名至关重要,而颞叶后部区域则介导视觉物体命名和描述命名。为了确定这种任务特异性是否反映正常的脑组织和处理过程,13名健康成年人在功能神经成像期间进行了描述命名和视觉命名。除了标准的单变量分析外,多变量有序趋势分析还检查了特定任务命名中涉及区域的网络特征。单变量分析表明视觉命名和描述命名均激活颞叶后部,而多变量分析揭示了两项任务的更广泛网络,包括重叠区域和特定任务区域,以及任务在利用共同区域方式上的任务相关差异。此外,多变量分析揭示了独特的、特定任务的、区域共变的激活模式,在所有13名受试者的视觉命名中以及12/13名受试者的描述命名中都惊人地一致。结果表明在神经功能正常的个体中,视觉命名和描述命名存在共同的神经基础,但神经过程有所不同。这些发现支持将这两种类型的任务用于临床评估,并且可能在治疗基于神经学的命名缺陷中具有应用价值。公司。