• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

全球卫生优先事项——富人的优先事项?

Global health priorities - priorities of the wealthy?

作者信息

Ollila Eeva

机构信息

Globalism and Social Policy Programme (GASPP), Welfare Research Group, National Research and Development Centre for Welfare and Health (Stakes), Helsinki, Finland.

出版信息

Global Health. 2005 Apr 22;1(1):6. doi: 10.1186/1744-8603-1-6.

DOI:10.1186/1744-8603-1-6
PMID:15847685
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1143784/
Abstract

Health has gained importance on the global agenda. It has become recognized in forums where it was once not addressed. In this article three issues are considered: global health policy actors, global health priorities and the means of addressing the identified health priorities. I argue that the arenas for global health policy-making have shifted from the public spheres towards arenas that include the transnational for-profit sector. Global health policy has become increasingly fragmented and verticalized. Infectious diseases have gained ground as global health priorities, while non-communicable diseases and the broader issues of health systems development have been neglected. Approaches to tackling the health problems are increasingly influenced by trade and industrial interests with the emphasis on technological solutions.

摘要

健康在全球议程上已变得愈发重要。它在曾经未被提及的论坛中已得到认可。本文探讨了三个问题:全球卫生政策行为体、全球卫生优先事项以及应对已确定的卫生优先事项的手段。我认为,全球卫生政策制定的舞台已从公共领域转向了包括跨国营利部门在内的领域。全球卫生政策日益碎片化和垂直化。传染病作为全球卫生优先事项的地位日益凸显,而非传染性疾病以及卫生系统发展等更广泛问题却被忽视。解决卫生问题的方法越来越受到贸易和产业利益的影响,且侧重于技术解决方案。

相似文献

1
Global health priorities - priorities of the wealthy?全球卫生优先事项——富人的优先事项?
Global Health. 2005 Apr 22;1(1):6. doi: 10.1186/1744-8603-1-6.
2
Shifting patterns and competing explanations for infectious disease priority in global health agenda setting arenas.传染病在全球卫生议程设定领域的优先事项的变化模式和相互竞争的解释。
Health Policy Plan. 2024 Sep 10;39(8):805-818. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czae035.
3
Making sense of the global health crisis: policy narratives, conflict, and global health governance.理解全球健康危机:政策叙述、冲突与全球卫生治理。
J Health Polit Policy Law. 2012 Apr;37(2):253-95. doi: 10.1215/03616878-1538620.
4
Evidence-based policy-making: the implications of globally-applicable research for context-specific problem-solving in developing countries.循证决策:全球适用的研究对发展中国家因地制宜解决问题的影响。
Soc Sci Med. 2009 Nov;69(10):1539-46. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2009.08.006. Epub 2009 Sep 24.
5
Research priorities for zoonoses and marginalized infections.人畜共患病和边缘性感染的研究重点。
World Health Organ Tech Rep Ser. 2012(971):ix-xi, 1-119, 2 p following 119.
6
Neglected tropical disease and emerging infectious disease: an analysis of the history, promise and constraints of two worldviews.被忽视的热带病与新发传染病:两种世界观的历史、前景与局限分析
Glob Public Health. 2014;9(9):995-1007. doi: 10.1080/17441692.2014.941297. Epub 2014 Aug 5.
7
Commercial influence and global nongovernmental public action in health and pharmaceutical policies.商业影响和全球非政府公共行动在卫生和药品政策方面。
Int J Health Serv. 2011;41(3):539-63. doi: 10.2190/HS.41.3.h.
8
'One health' and development priorities in resource-constrained countries: policy lessons from avian and pandemic influenza preparedness in Zambia.资源有限国家的“同一健康”与发展重点:赞比亚禽流感和大流行性流感防范的政策经验教训
Health Policy Plan. 2015 Mar;30(2):215-22. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czu001. Epub 2014 Feb 14.
9
[Positioning Ecuador in the global health agenda as a result of sector reform].[通过部门改革将厄瓜多尔定位在全球卫生议程中]
Rev Panam Salud Publica. 2017 Jun 8;41:e55. doi: 10.26633/RPSP.2017.55.
10
Health policy and systems research agendas in developing countries.发展中国家的卫生政策与系统研究议程
Health Res Policy Syst. 2004 Aug 5;2(1):6. doi: 10.1186/1478-4505-2-6.

引用本文的文献

1
Challenges in international health financing and implications for the new pandemic fund.国际卫生融资面临的挑战及对新大流行病基金的影响。
Global Health. 2023 Dec 5;19(1):97. doi: 10.1186/s12992-023-00999-6.
2
Delays in seeking, reaching and access to quality cancer care in sub-Saharan Africa: a systematic review.撒哈拉以南非洲地区寻求、获得和获得高质量癌症护理的延误:系统评价。
BMJ Open. 2023 Apr 13;13(4):e067715. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-067715.
3
The biomedical securitization of global health.全球卫生的生物医学安全化。
Global Health. 2023 Mar 4;19(1):15. doi: 10.1186/s12992-023-00915-y.
4
Mitigating donor interests in the case of COVID-19 vaccine: the implication of COVAX and DAC membership.减轻 COVID-19 疫苗供应方的利益考量:COVAX 和 DAC 成员资格的影响。
BMJ Glob Health. 2023 Jan;8(1). doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2022-010188.
5
Situational assessment of adult vaccine preventable disease and the potential for immunization advocacy and policy in low- and middle-income countries.低收入和中等收入国家成人疫苗可预防疾病的情况评估以及免疫宣传与政策的潜力。
Vaccine. 2021 Mar 12;39(11):1556-1564. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2021.01.066. Epub 2021 Feb 19.
6
Multi-Criteria-Decision-Analysis (MCDA) for the Horizon Scanning of Health Innovations an Application to COVID 19 Emergency.多准则决策分析(MCDA)在卫生创新的前瞻性扫描中的应用——以 COVID-19 紧急情况为例。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Oct 26;17(21):7823. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17217823.
7
Global Health - emergence, hegemonic trends and biomedical reductionism.全球卫生——出现、霸权趋势和生物医学简化论。
Global Health. 2020 May 6;16(1):42. doi: 10.1186/s12992-020-00573-4.
8
Towards better diagnostic tools for liver injury in low-income and middle-income countries.致力于为低收入和中等收入国家开发更好的肝损伤诊断工具。
BMJ Glob Health. 2019 Jul 18;4(4):e001704. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2019-001704. eCollection 2019.
9
Advancing equitable global health research partnerships in Africa.推动非洲公平的全球卫生研究伙伴关系。
BMJ Glob Health. 2018 Aug 23;3(4):e000868. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2018-000868. eCollection 2018.
10
Satisfaction about Patient-centeredness and Healthcare System among Patients with Chronic Multimorbidity.慢性病患者对以患者为中心和医疗保健系统的满意度。
Curr Med Sci. 2018 Feb;38(1):184-190. doi: 10.1007/s11596-018-1863-8. Epub 2018 Mar 15.

本文引用的文献

1
The global burden of chronic diseases: overcoming impediments to prevention and control.慢性病的全球负担:克服预防和控制的障碍
JAMA. 2004 Jun 2;291(21):2616-22. doi: 10.1001/jama.291.21.2616.
2
The world health report 2002 - reducing risks, promoting healthy life.《2002年世界卫生报告——降低风险,促进健康生活》
Educ Health (Abingdon). 2003 Jul;16(2):230. doi: 10.1080/1357628031000116808.
3
The Global Fund to fight AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria (GFATM).抗击艾滋病、结核病和疟疾全球基金(全球基金)
Health Policy Plan. 2004 Jan;19(1):52-3; discussion 54-6. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czh006.
4
Public health. Grand Challenges in Global Health.公共卫生。全球卫生领域的重大挑战。
Science. 2003 Oct 17;302(5644):398-9. doi: 10.1126/science.1091769.
5
Faltering steps towards partnerships.迈向伙伴关系的蹒跚步伐。
BMJ. 2002 Nov 23;325(7374):1236-40. doi: 10.1136/bmj.325.7374.1236.
6
Influence and opportunity: reflections on the U.S. role in global public health.影响与机遇:对美国在全球公共卫生中角色的思考
Health Aff (Millwood). 2002 Nov-Dec;21(6):131-41. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.21.6.131.
7
WHO's mandate: a damaging reinterpretation is taking place.世界卫生组织的使命:正在发生一种有害的重新诠释。
Lancet. 2002 Sep 28;360(9338):960-1. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(02)11117-2.
8
From population control to "reproductive rights": ideological influences in population policy.从人口控制到“生殖权利”:人口政策中的意识形态影响
Third World Q. 1998;19(3):375-93. doi: 10.1080/01436599814307.
9
A global health fund: a leap of faith?一个全球卫生基金:一次信念上的飞跃?
BMJ. 2001 Jul 21;323(7305):152-4. doi: 10.1136/bmj.323.7305.152.
10
WHO and industry partnership. All commercial enterprises should be excluded from the development process.
BMJ. 2000 Oct 14;321(7266):958-9.