• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

对智障人群中三种不同牙刷的菌斑清除能力的临床评估。

Clinical evaluation of the plaque-removing ability of three different toothbrushes in a mentally disabled group.

作者信息

Doğan M Cem, Alaçam Alev, Aşici Nalan, Odabaş Mesut, Seydaoğlu Gülşah

机构信息

Department of Pedodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Cukurova, Adana, Turkey.

出版信息

Acta Odontol Scand. 2004 Dec;62(6):350-4. doi: 10.1080/00016350410010054.

DOI:10.1080/00016350410010054
PMID:15848980
Abstract

The aim of the study was to evaluate the efficacy of plaque removal of three different toothbrushes on mentally disabled children in two different age groups. A manual triple-headed brush (SuperBrush; Dento Co. AS [junior, regular]) compared with a new manual toothbrush (CrossAction; Oral-B [35 compact, 40 regular]) and an electric toothbrush with an oscillating rotating head (Braun Plaque Control 3D [Braun 3D]; Oral-B [D15525]). Fifteen children aged 6-12 (Group A) and 15 children aged 13-18 (Group B) with mild mental disabilities participated in the single-blind clinical study. To obtain a plaque-free condition at baseline, professional tooth-cleaning was performed on each participant. After instructions on how to use the toothbrushes, each group started the experiment. After 1 week of application, the Quikley Hein (QH) plaque index and the approximal plaque index (API) were used to assess the oral hygiene status of each participant. This was followed by a week of recess before each group switched to the next type of toothbrush. The study lasted for 5 weeks. Compared to the two other brushes, the Braun 3D was more effective in removing plaque (means of QHI: 1.54 (Braun 3D), 1.77 (SuperBrush), and 2.15 (CrossAction) in total; means of API 1.37 (Braun 3D), 1.52 (SuperBrush), 1.94 (CrossAction). The study indicated that the electric toothbrush is the most effective for removing dental plaque in mentally disabled children, whereas the SuperBrush is a good alternative.

摘要

该研究的目的是评估三种不同牙刷对两个不同年龄组智障儿童的牙菌斑清除效果。将一种手动三头牙刷(SuperBrush;Dento Co. AS [儿童款、常规款])与一种新型手动牙刷(CrossAction;Oral-B [35紧凑型、40常规型])以及一种带有振荡旋转头的电动牙刷(博朗3D牙菌斑控制牙刷 [博朗3D];Oral-B [D15525])进行比较。15名6至12岁的儿童(A组)和15名13至18岁的儿童(B组)患有轻度智力障碍,参与了这项单盲临床研究。为了在基线时获得无牙菌斑状态,对每位参与者进行了专业的牙齿清洁。在接受如何使用牙刷的指导后,每组开始实验。使用1周后,采用Quikley Hein(QH)菌斑指数和邻面菌斑指数(API)评估每位参与者的口腔卫生状况。之后每组休息1周,然后再更换为下一种类型的牙刷。该研究持续了5周。与其他两种牙刷相比,博朗3D在清除牙菌斑方面更有效(QHI的平均值:总体上,博朗3D为1.54,SuperBrush为1.77,CrossAction为2.15;API的平均值:博朗3D为1.37,SuperBrush为1.52,CrossAction为1.94)。该研究表明,电动牙刷对智障儿童清除牙菌斑最有效,而SuperBrush是一个不错的替代品。

相似文献

1
Clinical evaluation of the plaque-removing ability of three different toothbrushes in a mentally disabled group.对智障人群中三种不同牙刷的菌斑清除能力的临床评估。
Acta Odontol Scand. 2004 Dec;62(6):350-4. doi: 10.1080/00016350410010054.
2
Clinical study of the effectiveness of two sonic toothbrushes.两款声波牙刷有效性的临床研究
J Clin Dent. 2000;11(1):24-7.
3
Plaque removal efficacy of a novel manual toothbrush with MicroPulse bristles and an advanced split-head design.一款具有微脉冲刷毛和先进分体刷头设计的新型手动牙刷的牙菌斑清除功效。
J Clin Dent. 2007;18(2):49-54.
4
Plaque removal efficacy of a new experimental battery-powered toothbrush relative to two advanced-design manual toothbrushes.一种新型实验性电池驱动牙刷相对于两种先进设计手动牙刷的牙菌斑清除效果。
J Clin Dent. 2002;13(5):191-7.
5
Efficacy of the Cybersonic in comparison with the Braun 3D Excel and a manual toothbrush.Cybersonic与博朗3D Excel及手动牙刷相比的功效。
J Clin Periodontol. 2005 Apr;32(4):360-3. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-051X.2005.00683.x.
6
Clinical study on the plaque-removing ability of a new triple-headed toothbrush.新型三头牙刷去除牙菌斑能力的临床研究
J Clin Periodontol. 1999 May;26(5):281-5. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-051x.1999.260503.x.
7
Plaque removal efficacy of two rotating/oscillating electric toothbrushes.两款旋转/振荡式电动牙刷的牙菌斑清除效果
J Clin Dent. 2001;12(1):14-6.
8
An investigation into the effect of three months' clinical wear on toothbrush efficacy: results from two independent studies.三个月临床使用对牙刷功效影响的调查:两项独立研究的结果
J Clin Dent. 2003;14(2):29-33.
9
A clinical study of plaque removal with an advanced rechargeable power toothbrush and a battery-operated device.一项关于使用先进的可充电电动牙刷和电池驱动设备去除牙菌斑的临床研究。
Am J Dent. 2002 Dec;15(6):365-8.
10
Blinded clinical evaluation of a new manual toothbrush.一种新型手动牙刷的盲法临床评估
J Clin Dent. 2006;17(1):1-4.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluation of the effectiveness of novel oral hygiene aids in the prevention of gingival diseases in children and adolescents with special healthcare needs - A systematic review and meta-analysis.评估新型口腔卫生辅助工具对有特殊医疗需求的儿童和青少年预防牙龈疾病的有效性——一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Dent Res J (Isfahan). 2025 Feb 20;22:5. doi: 10.4103/drj.drj_286_24. eCollection 2025.
2
Smartphone-Based Telemonitoring for Better Oral Health With Toothbrushes: 6-Month Randomized Controlled Trial.基于智能手机的牙刷远程监测改善口腔健康:6个月随机对照试验。
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Feb 10;27:e65128. doi: 10.2196/65128.
3
Assessment of Oral Health Status and Treatment Needs of Institutionalized Children With Special Needs in Poonamallee, Chennai: A Cross-Sectional Study.
钦奈普纳马利地区机构照料的特殊需求儿童口腔健康状况及治疗需求评估:一项横断面研究
Cureus. 2023 Nov 2;15(11):e48139. doi: 10.7759/cureus.48139. eCollection 2023 Nov.
4
Efficacy of Chewable Brush Compared to Manual Brush in School Going Children of Age Group 10-12 Years.10至12岁学龄儿童中咀嚼式牙刷与手动牙刷的效果比较
J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2023 Jul;15(Suppl 2):S1301-S1304. doi: 10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_110_23. Epub 2023 Jul 11.
5
Plaque removal efficacy of a new toothbrush with a double-sided head and rotating handle-a pilot randomized control trial in acquired brain injury patients.新型双面刷头和旋转手柄牙刷去除斑块的疗效:一项针对后天性脑损伤患者的初步随机对照试验。
Clin Oral Investig. 2023 Aug;27(8):4855-4860. doi: 10.1007/s00784-023-05106-y. Epub 2023 Jun 30.
6
Effect of ozone irrigation and powered toothbrushing on dental plaque, gingival inflammation, and microbial status in institutionalized mentally challenged individuals: A double-blinded, randomized, controlled clinical trial.臭氧冲洗和电动牙刷对机构化智力障碍者牙菌斑、牙龈炎症及微生物状况的影响:一项双盲、随机、对照临床试验。
J Indian Soc Periodontol. 2023 May-Jun;27(3):315-319. doi: 10.4103/jisp.jisp_69_22. Epub 2023 May 1.
7
Powered Toothbrushes: An Opportunity for Biofilm and Gingival Inflammation Control.电动牙刷:控制生物膜和牙龈炎症的一个契机。
Int J Dent. 2022 Aug 22;2022:6874144. doi: 10.1155/2022/6874144. eCollection 2022.
8
Plaque Removal Efficacy of Triple-Headed Toothbrush in 4-6-Year-Old Children: A Randomized Crossover Study.三头牙刷对4至6岁儿童的牙菌斑清除效果:一项随机交叉研究
J Int Soc Prev Community Dent. 2021 Sep 21;11(5):546-552. doi: 10.4103/jispcd.JISPCD_93_21. eCollection 2021 Sep-Oct.
9
A comparative evaluation of manual and powered brushing on oral health and microbial status of mentally challenged individuals.手动刷牙与电动刷牙对智障人士口腔健康和微生物状况的比较评估。
J Indian Soc Periodontol. 2020 Jul-Aug;24(4):362-368. doi: 10.4103/jisp.jisp_340_19. Epub 2020 Jul 1.
10
Oral hygiene interventions for people with intellectual disabilities.针对智障人士的口腔卫生干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 May 31;5(5):CD012628. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012628.pub2.