• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

家庭医生使用的简短身体活动评估的可靠性和有效性。

Reliability and validity of a brief physical activity assessment for use by family doctors.

作者信息

Marshall A L, Smith B J, Bauman A E, Kaur S

机构信息

School of Human Movement Studies, University of Queensland, St Lucia, Qld 4072, Australia.

出版信息

Br J Sports Med. 2005 May;39(5):294-7; discussion 294-7. doi: 10.1136/bjsm.2004.013771.

DOI:10.1136/bjsm.2004.013771
PMID:15849294
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1725203/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the reliability and validity of a brief physical activity assessment tool suitable for doctors to use to identify inactive patients in the primary care setting.

METHODS

Volunteer family doctors (n = 8) screened consenting patients (n = 75) for physical activity participation using a brief physical activity assessment tool. Inter-rater reliability was assessed within one week (n = 71). Validity was assessed against an objective physical activity monitor (computer science and applications accelerometer; n = 42).

RESULTS

The brief physical activity assessment tool produced repeatable estimates of "sufficient total physical activity", correctly classifying over 76% of cases (kappa 0.53, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.33 to 0.72). The validity coefficient was reasonable (kappa 0.40, 95% CI 0.12 to 0.69), with good percentage agreement (71%).

CONCLUSIONS

The brief physical activity assessment tool is a reliable instrument, with validity similar to that of more detailed self report measures of physical activity. It is a tool that can be used efficiently in routine primary healthcare services to identify insufficiently active patients who may need physical activity advice.

摘要

目的

评估一种简短的身体活动评估工具的可靠性和有效性,该工具适用于医生在初级保健环境中识别不活跃的患者。

方法

志愿家庭医生(n = 8)使用简短的身体活动评估工具对同意参与的患者(n = 75)进行身体活动参与情况筛查。在一周内评估了评分者间信度(n = 71)。通过客观身体活动监测器(计算机科学与应用加速度计;n = 42)评估效度。

结果

简短的身体活动评估工具对“足够的总体身体活动”产生了可重复的估计,正确分类了超过76%的病例(kappa值为0.53,95%置信区间(CI)为0.33至0.72)。效度系数合理(kappa值为0.40,95%CI为0.12至0.69),一致性百分比良好(71%)。

结论

简短的身体活动评估工具是一种可靠的工具,其效度与更详细的身体活动自我报告测量方法相似。它是一种可在常规初级医疗保健服务中有效使用的工具,用于识别可能需要身体活动建议的身体活动不足的患者。

相似文献

1
Reliability and validity of a brief physical activity assessment for use by family doctors.家庭医生使用的简短身体活动评估的可靠性和有效性。
Br J Sports Med. 2005 May;39(5):294-7; discussion 294-7. doi: 10.1136/bjsm.2004.013771.
2
Screening for physical activity in family practice: evaluation of two brief assessment tools.家庭医疗中身体活动筛查:两种简短评估工具的评价
Am J Prev Med. 2005 Nov;29(4):256-64. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2005.07.005.
3
Reliability and validity testing of a single-item physical activity measure.单项体力活动测量的信度和效度测试。
Br J Sports Med. 2011 Mar;45(3):203-8. doi: 10.1136/bjsm.2009.068395. Epub 2010 May 19.
4
[Use of the WHODAS II with stroke patients and their relatives: reliability and inter-rater-reliability].《世界卫生组织残疾评定量表第二版在中风患者及其亲属中的应用:信度和评分者间信度》
Rehabilitation (Stuttg). 2008 Feb;47(1):31-8. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-985168.
5
Physical activity in patients who are severely mentally ill: feasibility of assessment for clinical and research applications.重症精神疾病患者的身体活动:临床及研究应用评估的可行性
Arch Psychiatr Nurs. 2006 Oct;20(5):205-9. doi: 10.1016/j.apnu.2006.04.002.
6
Reliability and validity of the Past Year Total Physical Activity Questionnaire.过去一年总体身体活动问卷的信度和效度
Am J Epidemiol. 2006 May 15;163(10):959-70. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwj112. Epub 2006 Mar 8.
7
Physical activity assessment: validation of a clinical assessment tool.体力活动评估:一种临床评估工具的验证
Am J Prev Med. 2006 Dec;31(6):484-91. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2006.08.021. Epub 2006 Nov 3.
8
Validity of four short physical activity questionnaires in middle-aged persons.四份简短身体活动问卷在中年人中的效度
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2006 Jul;38(7):1255-66. doi: 10.1249/01.mss.0000227310.18902.28.
9
The de Quervain's screening tool: validity and reliability of a measure to support clinical diagnosis and management.德·奎尔万筛查工具:一种支持临床诊断与管理的测量方法的有效性和可靠性
Musculoskeletal Care. 2008 Sep;6(3):168-80. doi: 10.1002/msc.129.
10
Reliability and validity of the habitual activity estimation scale (HAES) in patients with cystic fibrosis.囊性纤维化患者习惯性活动评估量表(HAES)的信度和效度
Pediatr Pulmonol. 2008 Apr;43(4):345-53. doi: 10.1002/ppul.20737.

引用本文的文献

1
Do expectations shape interoceptive perceptions across body domains? A sham EMF study to test the predictive processing theory.期望会塑造跨身体区域的内感受知觉吗?一项用于检验预测加工理论的假电磁研究。
Int J Clin Health Psychol. 2025 Jul-Sep;25(3):100609. doi: 10.1016/j.ijchp.2025.100609. Epub 2025 Jul 18.
2
Evaluation of Cardiovascular Disease Risk According to the Morningness-Eveningness Status in Adult Individuals.根据成年人的晨型-夜型状态评估心血管疾病风险
Cureus. 2025 Jun 25;17(6):e86751. doi: 10.7759/cureus.86751. eCollection 2025 Jun.
3
Effect of Dietary Intake of Advanced Glycation End Products on Metabolic Parameters and Anthropometric Measurements in Adults.成人膳食中晚期糖基化终产物的摄入量对代谢参数和人体测量指标的影响。
Cureus. 2025 Jun 25;17(6):e86752. doi: 10.7759/cureus.86752. eCollection 2025 Jun.
4
The effect of a systematic multi-dimensional assessment in severe uncontrolled asthma: a literature review and protocol for an investigator-initiated, open-label, randomized-controlled trial (EXACT@home study).系统多维评估对严重难治性哮喘的影响:一项文献综述及研究者发起的开放标签随机对照试验方案(EXACT@home研究)
BMC Pulm Med. 2025 May 17;25(1):240. doi: 10.1186/s12890-025-03646-5.
5
A Comprehensive Understanding of Postural Tone Biomechanics: Intrinsic Stiffness, Functional Stiffness, Antagonist Coactivation, and COP Dynamics in Post-Stroke Adults.对中风后成年人姿势张力生物力学的全面理解:内在刚度、功能刚度、拮抗肌共同激活和压力中心动态
Sensors (Basel). 2025 Mar 30;25(7):2196. doi: 10.3390/s25072196.
6
Mental health and sleep quality: are intuitive eating, hedonic hunger and diet quality, determinants? a cross-sectional study.心理健康与睡眠质量:直觉性饮食、享乐性饥饿和饮食质量是决定因素吗?一项横断面研究。
Malawi Med J. 2024 Jul 30;36(2):80-89. doi: 10.4314/mmj.v36i2.4. eCollection 2024 Jul.
7
Validation of the brief physical activity assessment tool: Comparison of telephone and in-person administration.简短身体活动评估工具的验证:电话调查与当面调查的比较
PLoS One. 2025 Jan 24;20(1):e0317614. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0317614. eCollection 2025.
8
The utility of brief instruments for depression screening in dialysis patients.简短工具在透析患者抑郁筛查中的效用。
Clin Kidney J. 2024 Nov 22;18(1):sfae369. doi: 10.1093/ckj/sfae369. eCollection 2025 Jan.
9
Physical activity and tobacco smoking in the German adult population.德国成年人群体中的体育活动与吸烟情况
BMJ Open Sport Exerc Med. 2024 Dec 22;10(4):e002087. doi: 10.1136/bmjsem-2024-002087. eCollection 2024.
10
Psychological factors and health-related quality of life in fibromyalgia patients.纤维肌痛患者的心理因素与健康相关生活质量
Health Psychol Rep. 2024 Aug 19;12(4):352-367. doi: 10.5114/hpr/187335. eCollection 2024.

本文引用的文献

1
International physical activity questionnaire: 12-country reliability and validity.国际体力活动问卷:12个国家的信度和效度
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2003 Aug;35(8):1381-95. doi: 10.1249/01.MSS.0000078924.61453.FB.
2
Promoting physical activity in general practice: a controlled trial of written advice and information materials.在全科医疗中推广体育活动:书面建议和信息材料的对照试验
Br J Sports Med. 2000 Aug;34(4):262-7. doi: 10.1136/bjsm.34.4.262.
3
Assessment of physical activity by self-report: status, limitations, and future directions.通过自我报告评估身体活动:现状、局限性及未来方向。
Res Q Exerc Sport. 2000 Jun;71(2 Suppl):S1-14.
4
Review of primary care-based physical activity intervention studies: effectiveness and implications for practice and future research.基于初级保健的身体活动干预研究综述:有效性及对实践和未来研究的启示
J Fam Pract. 2000 Feb;49(2):158-68.
5
Physical activity preferences, preferred sources of assistance, and perceived barriers to increased activity among physically inactive Australians.身体活动不活跃的澳大利亚人的身体活动偏好、首选的援助来源以及增加活动的感知障碍。
Prev Med. 1997 Jan-Feb;26(1):131-7. doi: 10.1006/pmed.1996.9982.
6
Beliefs and behaviour of general practitioners regarding promotion of physical activity.全科医生在促进身体活动方面的信念和行为。
Aust J Public Health. 1995 Jun;19(3):300-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1753-6405.1995.tb00448.x.