Suppr超能文献

在偏远地区估计沙眼患病率的临床检查和实验室检测:它们究竟告诉了我们什么?

Clinical examination and laboratory tests for estimation of trachoma prevalence in a remote setting: what are they really telling us?

作者信息

Wright Heathcote R, Taylor Hugh R

机构信息

Centre for Eye Research Australia, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.

出版信息

Lancet Infect Dis. 2005 May;5(5):313-20. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(05)70116-X.

Abstract

Worldwide, an estimated 84 million people have active trachoma and 7.6 million people have trachomatous trichiasis. WHO's SAFE strategy is an effective tool in the worldwide effort to eliminate blinding trachoma, but its institution and monitoring requires a simple, reliable, and cost-effective method to detect disease. To date, clinical examination has provided the main method of diagnosis. Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis with nucleic acid amplification tests does not always correlate well with clinical findings, which has prompted the suggestion that these methods should replace clinical examination. However, a review of the research carried out in animals and human beings suggests the relation between laboratory tests and clinical examination is due to the kinetics of trachoma and not to an inherent problem in either detection system. Given the increased difficulties of using laboratory tests in parts of the world where trachoma is endemic, we should not abandon clinical grading as a tool to assess the need for, and the effectiveness of, trachoma intervention programmes.

摘要

全球范围内,估计有8400万人患有活动性沙眼,760万人患有沙眼性倒睫。世卫组织的SAFE战略是全球消除致盲性沙眼努力中的一项有效工具,但其实施和监测需要一种简单、可靠且具有成本效益的疾病检测方法。迄今为止,临床检查一直是主要的诊断方法。用核酸扩增试验检测沙眼衣原体并不总是与临床结果高度相关,这促使有人建议这些方法应取代临床检查。然而,一项对在动物和人类身上开展的研究的综述表明,实验室检测与临床检查之间的关系是由沙眼的发病过程决定的,而非任何一种检测系统本身存在问题。鉴于在沙眼流行地区使用实验室检测的难度增加,我们不应放弃将临床分级作为评估沙眼干预计划的必要性和有效性的一种工具。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验