Fine Jeffrey J, Hopkins Christie B, Hall Patrick A X, Delphia Robert E, Attebery Timothy W, Newton F Carter
Department of Investigator Initiated Research, South Carolina Heart Center, Columbia, SC 29063, USA.
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2004 Dec;20(6):549-52. doi: 10.1007/s10554-004-7018-y.
Technology advances in multislice detector computed tomography (MSCT) cardiac scanning, specifically in the application of intravenous injected contrast coronary angiography with EKG gating have led to the availability of this procedure in every day outpatient cardiac medicine.
The aim of this study is to test the head to head direct coronary angiography with MSCT coronary angiography in clinical situations where cardiac cath is traditionally utilized for management decisions.
We limited our analysis to vessels felt to be 1.5 mm or greater in diameter, recognizing diagnostic accuracy and medical importance of smaller vessels is low. All 50 patients (52% men, 48% women age range 34-78) were studied because of the clinical suspicion of obstructive coronary atherosclerosis. Blinded experts in direct and in MSCT independently read the studies and resolved disparities by a subsequent discussion. Standard protocols for direct and for MSCT angiography were used including use of IV and oral beta blockade to keep the heart rate at or below 60 beats per minute.
392 vessels were evaluated. MSCT provided images of sufficient technical quality to permit diagnosis in 98% (49/50) of cases. MSCT was 96% accurate in identifying patients as having either no disease, single vessel disease, or multiple vessel disease. For all vessels, MSCT identification of stenotic lesions of >50% were as follows: sensitivity 87%, specificity 97%, positive predictive value 80%, and negative predictive value 98%. Pearson correlation results between direct catheter and MSCT for absolute stenotic percentages were left main (0.92 p < 0.0001), left anterior descending (0.94 p < 0.0001), circumflex (0.94 p < 0.0001), first obtuse marginal (0.85 p < 0.0001), and right coronary artery (0.89 p < 0.0001).
The accuracy of MSCT angiography compared favorably with that of direct cardiac cath in this cohort of patients. The high specificity of these findings suggest that one particular use of this technique will be to eliminate many unnecessary cardiac catheterization procedures by excluding obstructive, and therefore potentially PCI requiring, coronary artery disease. The medical cost savings of such an application may be very significant and bears further study.
多层螺旋CT(MSCT)心脏扫描技术的进步,特别是在静脉注射造影剂并结合心电图门控的冠状动脉造影中的应用,使得该检查在日常门诊心脏医学中得以开展。
本研究旨在在传统上利用心脏导管检查进行治疗决策的临床情况下,对MSCT冠状动脉造影与直接冠状动脉造影进行直接对比测试。
我们将分析局限于直径1.5毫米或更大的血管,因为认识到较小血管的诊断准确性和医学重要性较低。所有50例患者(男性占52%,女性占48%,年龄范围34 - 78岁)因临床怀疑存在阻塞性冠状动脉粥样硬化而接受研究。直接冠状动脉造影和MSCT方面的盲法专家独立解读研究结果,并通过后续讨论解决分歧。采用直接冠状动脉造影和MSCT血管造影的标准方案,包括使用静脉和口服β受体阻滞剂将心率保持在或低于每分钟60次。
共评估了392条血管。MSCT提供了技术质量足以进行诊断的图像,在98%(49/50)的病例中可行。MSCT在识别患者有无疾病、单支血管病变或多支血管病变方面的准确率为96%。对于所有血管,MSCT识别>50%狭窄病变的情况如下:敏感性87%,特异性97%,阳性预测值80%,阴性预测值98%。直接导管检查与MSCT在绝对狭窄百分比方面的Pearson相关性结果为:左主干(0.92,p < 0.0001),左前降支(0.94,p < 0.0001),回旋支(0.94,p < 0.0001),第一钝缘支(0.85,p < 0.0001),右冠状动脉(0.89,p < 0.0001)。
在该组患者中,MSCT血管造影的准确性与直接心脏导管检查相当。这些结果的高特异性表明,该技术的一个特殊用途将是通过排除阻塞性冠状动脉疾病(因此可能需要PCI)来消除许多不必要的心脏导管检查程序。这种应用在医疗成本节约方面可能非常显著,值得进一步研究。