Karalis D G, Chandrasekaran K, Ross J J, Micklin A, Brown B M, Ren J F, Mintz G S
Department of Medicine, Likoff Cardiovascular Institute, Hahnemann University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19102-1192.
Am J Cardiol. 1992 May 15;69(16):1310-5. doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(92)91227-u.
To assess the value and limitations of single-plane transesophageal echocardiography in the evaluation of prosthetic aortic valve function, 89 patients (69 mechanical and 20 bioprosthetic aortic valves) were studied by combined transthoracic and transesophageal 2-dimensional and color flow Doppler echocardiography. In the assessment of aortic regurgitation, the transthoracic and transesophageal echocardiographic findings were concordant in 71 of 89 patients (80%). In 8 patients, the degree of aortic regurgitation was underestimated by the transthoracic approach; in each case the quality of the transthoracic echocardiogram was poor. In 10 patients, transesophageal echocardiography failed to detect trivial aortic regurgitation due to acoustic shadowing of the left ventricular outflow tract from a mechanical valve in the mitral valve position. Transesophageal echocardiography was superior to transthoracic echocardiography in diagnosing perivalvular abscess, subaortic perforation, valvular dehiscence, torn or thickened bioprosthetic aortic valve cusps, and in clearly distinguishing perivalvular from valvular aortic regurgitation. Transesophageal echocardiography correctly diagnosed bioprosthetic valve obstruction in 1 patient, but failed to diagnose mechanical valve obstruction in another. In conclusion, transesophageal echocardiography offers no advantage over the transthoracic approach in the detection and quantification of prosthetic aortic regurgitation unless the transthoracic image quality is poor. Transesophageal echocardiography is limited in detecting mechanical valve obstruction and in detecting aortic regurgitation in the presence of a mechanical prosthesis in the mitral valve position. However, it is superior to transthoracic echocardiography in identifying perivalvular pathology, differentiating perivalvular from valvular regurgitation and in defining the anatomic abnormality responsible for the prosthetic valve dysfunction. Combined transthoracic and transesophageal examination provides complete anatomic and hemodynamic assessment of prosthetic aortic valve function.
为评估单平面经食管超声心动图在人工主动脉瓣功能评估中的价值及局限性,我们采用经胸和经食管二维及彩色血流多普勒超声心动图联合检查,对89例患者(69例机械瓣和20例生物瓣主动脉瓣)进行了研究。在评估主动脉瓣反流时,89例患者中有71例(80%)经胸和经食管超声心动图检查结果一致。8例患者经胸途径低估了主动脉瓣反流程度;每例经胸超声心动图质量均较差。10例患者因二尖瓣位机械瓣造成左心室流出道声学阴影,经食管超声心动图未能检测到轻微主动脉瓣反流。经食管超声心动图在诊断瓣周脓肿、主动脉瓣下穿孔、瓣膜裂开、生物瓣主动脉瓣叶撕裂或增厚以及明确区分瓣周与瓣膜性主动脉瓣反流方面优于经胸超声心动图。经食管超声心动图正确诊断了1例生物瓣狭窄,但未能诊断另1例机械瓣狭窄。总之, 除非经胸图像质量差,经食管超声心动图在人工主动脉瓣反流的检测和定量方面并不优于经胸途径。经食管超声心动图在检测机械瓣狭窄以及二尖瓣位存在机械瓣时检测主动脉瓣反流方面存在局限性。然而,在识别瓣周病变、区分瓣周与瓣膜性反流以及确定导致人工瓣膜功能障碍的解剖异常方面,经食管超声心动图优于经胸超声心动图。经胸和经食管联合检查可对人工主动脉瓣功能进行完整的解剖和血流动力学评估。