Lago Patrícia M, Piva Jefferson, Kipper Délio, Garcia Pedro Celiny, Pretto Cristiane, Giongo Mateus, Branco Ricardo, Bueno Fernanda, Traiber Cristiane, Araújo Taisa, Wortmann Daniela, Librelato Graziele, Soardi Deise
Hospital das Clínicas de Porto Alegre, Porto Alegre, RS.
J Pediatr (Rio J). 2005 Mar-Apr;81(2):111-7.
To describe causes of death and factors involved in the decision-making process related to life support limitation at three university-affiliated pediatric intensive care units in the south of Brazil.
A retrospective study was conducted, based on a review of the medical records of all deaths occurring during 2002 at three pediatric intensive care units in Porto Alegre. Three previously trained pediatric fellows from each service performed the study. Data were assessed relating to general case characteristics, causes of death (failed cardiopulmonary resuscitation, brain death, do-not-resuscitate orders, withholding or withdrawing life-sustaining treatment -- the last three modes were classified as the life support limitation group), length of stay in hospital, end-of-life plans and the participation of patients families and Ethics Committees. The Student t test, Mann Whitney, chi-square, odds ratio and multivariate analyses were used for comparisons.
Close to 53.3% of fatal cases had received full cardiopulmonary resuscitation. The incidence of life support limitation was 36%, with statistical differences (p = 0.014) between the three hospitals (25 versus 54.3 and 45.5%, respectively). The most frequent form of life support limitation was a do-not-resuscitate order (70%). Life support limitation was associated with the presence of chronic disease (odds ratio = 8.2; 95%CI 3.2-21.3) and length stay in the pediatric intensive care unit (odds ratio = 4.4; 95%CI 1.6-11.8). The rate of involvement of families and Ethics Committees in the decision-making process was lesser than 10%.
Cardiopulmonary resuscitation is offered more frequently than is observed in northern countries. In contrast, life support limitation is offered through do-not-resuscitate orders. These findings and the low participation of the families in the decision-making process reflect the difficulties to be overcome by those professionals who are responsible for handling critically ill children in southern Brazil.
描述巴西南部三家大学附属医院儿科重症监护病房的死亡原因以及与生命支持限制决策过程相关的因素。
进行了一项回顾性研究,基于对2002年阿雷格里港三家儿科重症监护病房所有死亡病例的病历审查。每个科室的三名经过预先培训的儿科住院医师进行了该研究。评估了与一般病例特征、死亡原因(心肺复苏失败、脑死亡、不进行心肺复苏医嘱、停止或撤销维持生命治疗——后三种模式归类为生命支持限制组)、住院时间、临终计划以及患者家属和伦理委员会的参与情况相关的数据。采用学生t检验、曼-惠特尼检验、卡方检验、比值比和多变量分析进行比较。
近53.3%的致命病例接受了充分的心肺复苏。生命支持限制的发生率为36%,三家医院之间存在统计学差异(p = 0.014)(分别为25%、54.3%和45.5%)。生命支持限制最常见的形式是不进行心肺复苏医嘱(70%)。生命支持限制与慢性病的存在(比值比 = 8.2;95%置信区间3.2 - 21.