Leacche Marzia, Unic Daniel, Goldhaber Samuel Z, Rawn James D, Aranki Sary F, Couper Gregory S, Mihaljevic Tomislav, Rizzo Robert J, Cohn Lawrence H, Aklog Lishan, Byrne John G
Division of Cardiac Surgery, and Cardiovascular Division, Brigham and Women's Hospital, 75 Francis Street, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2005 May;129(5):1018-23. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2004.10.023.
This study retrospectively reviews an aggressive multidisciplinary approach to the treatment of massive pulmonary embolism, centering on rapid diagnosis with contrast-enhanced computed tomography of the chest to define the location and degree of clot burden and transthoracic echocardiography to document right ventricular strain followed by immediate surgical intervention when appropriate.
Between October 1999 through February 2004, 47 patients (30 men and 17 women; median age, 58 years; age range, 24-86 years) underwent emergency surgical embolectomy for massive central pulmonary embolism. The indications for surgical intervention were (1) contraindications to thrombolysis (21/47 [45%]), (2) failed medical treatment (5/47 [10%]), and (3) right ventricular dysfunction (15/47 [32%]). Preoperatively, 12 (26%) of 47 patients were in cardiogenic shock, and 6 (11%) of 47 were in cardiac arrest.
There were 3 (6%) operative deaths, 2 with preoperative cardiac arrest; 2 of these 3 patients required a right ventricular assist device. In 38 (81%) patients a caval filter was placed intraoperatively. Median length of stay was 11 days (range, 3-75 days). Median follow-up was 27 months (range, 2-50 months); follow-up was 100% complete in surviving patients. There were 6 (12%) late deaths, 5 of which were from metastatic cancer. Actuarial survival at 1 and 3 years' follow-up was 86% and 83%, respectively.
An aggressive approach to large pulmonary embolus, including rapid diagnosis and prompt surgical intervention, has improved results with surgical embolectomy. We now perform surgical pulmonary embolectomy not only in patients with large central clot burden and hemodynamic compromise but also in hemodynamically stable patients with right ventricular dysfunction documented by means of echocardiography.
本研究回顾性分析了一种积极的多学科方法治疗大面积肺栓塞,重点是通过胸部增强计算机断层扫描快速诊断以明确血栓负荷的位置和程度,以及经胸超声心动图记录右心室应变,然后在适当情况下立即进行手术干预。
1999年10月至2004年2月期间,47例患者(30例男性和17例女性;中位年龄58岁;年龄范围24 - 86岁)因大面积中央型肺栓塞接受了急诊手术取栓术。手术干预的指征为:(1)溶栓治疗禁忌证(21/47 [45%]),(2)药物治疗失败(5/47 [10%]),以及(3)右心室功能障碍(15/47 [32%])。术前,47例患者中有12例(26%)发生心源性休克,47例中有6例(11%)发生心脏骤停。
有3例(6%)手术死亡,其中2例术前发生心脏骤停;这3例患者中有2例需要右心室辅助装置。38例(81%)患者术中放置了腔静脉滤器。中位住院时间为11天(范围3 - 75天)。中位随访时间为27个月(范围2 - 50个月);存活患者的随访率为100%。有6例(12%)晚期死亡,其中5例死于转移性癌症。1年和3年随访时的精算生存率分别为86%和83%。
对大面积肺栓塞采取积极的方法,包括快速诊断和及时手术干预,已改善了手术取栓的结果。我们现在不仅对血栓负荷大且有血流动力学障碍的患者进行手术肺栓子切除术,而且对经超声心动图证实有右心室功能障碍的血流动力学稳定患者也进行该手术。