Lam C M, Yuen A W, Chik B, Wai A C, Fan S T
Central Surgical Audit Unit, Central Coordinating Committee of Surgery, Hospital Authority, Hospital Authority Building, 147B Argyle Street, Kowloon, Hong Kong.
Surg Endosc. 2005 Jun;19(6):774-9. doi: 10.1007/s00464-004-9158-5. Epub 2005 May 4.
Despite being controversial in the past, many reports on the safe use of laparoscopic surgery in emergency settings have been published. The aim of this study was to investigate the diffusion of laparoscopic surgery in three common surgical emergency operations, namely, appendectomy, cholecystectomy, and simple repair of perforated peptic ulcer (PPU), in a stable population.
This was a retrospective analysis of the central database of the Hospital Authority (HA) in Hong Kong. Data for patients managed in 14 HA hospitals from 1998 to 2002 were studied. The operation record and discharge record of each patient were also investigated to verify the data.
A total of 12,708 patients underwent appendectomy, 2631 patients underwent cholecystectomy, and 2260 patients had simple repair of PPU performed. During the study period, 37.2% of appendectomies, 46.5% of cholecystectomies, and 23.1% of simple repairs of PPU were performed laparoscopically. More than a two-fold increase in the proportion of laparoscopic surgery was observed in each of these three operations. By the end of 2002, the percentage of laparoscopic surgery had increased to 53.5% for appendectomies, 61.3% for cholecystectomies, and 32.9% for simple repairs of PPU. Significantly lower hospital mortality rates and shorter postoperative hospital stay were consistenty observed in patients with laparoscopic surgery of the three emergencies. A wide variation in the use of laparoscopic surgery, ranging from 3.7% to 73.1%, was observed among the 14 HA hospitals. However, there was no correlation in the use of laparoscopic surgery with the volume of operation performed in each hospital (p = 0.933).
A high diffusion rate on the use of laparoscopic surgery for common surgical emergency was observed in Hong Kong. However, there was also a wide variation in the diffusion rate among the 14 HA hospitals. Efforts to reduce hospital variation for the better dissemination of safe laparoscopic technique may be warranted.
尽管过去存在争议,但现已发表了许多关于在急诊情况下安全使用腹腔镜手术的报告。本研究的目的是调查在稳定人群中,腹腔镜手术在三种常见外科急诊手术(即阑尾切除术、胆囊切除术和单纯性消化性溃疡穿孔修补术)中的普及情况。
这是一项对香港医院管理局(医管局)中央数据库的回顾性分析。研究了1998年至2002年期间在14家医管局医院接受治疗的患者数据。还对每位患者的手术记录和出院记录进行了调查以核实数据。
共有12708例患者接受了阑尾切除术,2631例患者接受了胆囊切除术,2260例患者接受了单纯性消化性溃疡穿孔修补术。在研究期间,37.2%的阑尾切除术、46.5%的胆囊切除术和23.1%的单纯性消化性溃疡穿孔修补术是通过腹腔镜进行的。在这三种手术中,每种手术的腹腔镜手术比例均观察到超过两倍的增长。到2002年底,阑尾切除术的腹腔镜手术百分比增至53.5%,胆囊切除术为61.3%,单纯性消化性溃疡穿孔修补术为32.9%。在这三种急诊腹腔镜手术患者中,一致观察到医院死亡率显著降低且术后住院时间缩短。在14家医管局医院中,腹腔镜手术的使用差异很大,范围从3.7%到73.1%。然而,腹腔镜手术的使用与每家医院的手术量之间没有相关性(p = 0.933)。
在香港,观察到腹腔镜手术在常见外科急诊中的使用率很高。然而,在14家医管局医院中,其使用率也存在很大差异。可能有必要努力减少医院间的差异,以便更好地推广安全的腹腔镜技术。