Barranger Emmanuel, Coutant Charles, Flahault Antoine, Delpech Yann, Darai Emile, Uzan Serge
Department of Gynecologic and Breast Cancers, Hôpital Tenon, 4 rue de la Chine, 75020 Paris, France.
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2005 May;91(2):113-9. doi: 10.1007/s10549-004-5781-z.
Axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) is the current standard of care for breast cancer patients with sentinel lymph node (SN) involvement. However, the SN is the only involved axillary node in a significant proportion of these patients. Here we examined factors predictive of non-SN involvement in patients with a metastatic SN, in order to develop a scoring system for predicting non-SN involvement.
This study was based on a prospective database of 337 patients who underwent SN biopsy for breast cancer, of whom 81 (24%) were SN-positive; we examined factors predictive of non SN involvement in the 71 of these 81 women who underwent complementary ALND. All clinical and histological criteria were recorded and analysed according to non-SN status, by using Chi-2 analysis, Student's t-test, and multivariate logistic regression.
Univariate analysis showed a significant association between non-SN involvement and histological primary tumor size (p=0.0001), SN macrometastasis (p=0.01), the method used to detect SN metastasis (H&E versus immunohistochemistry) (p=0.03), the number of positive SNs (p=0.049), the proportion of involved SNs among all identified SNs (p=0.0001) and lymphovascular invasion (p=0.006). Histological primary tumor size (p=0.006), SN macrometastasis (p=0.02) and the proportion of involved SNs among all identified SNs (p=0.03) remained significantly associated with non-SN status in multivariate analysis. Based on the multivariate analysis, we developed an axilla scoring system (range 0-7) to predict the likelihood of non-SN metastasis in breast cancer patients with SN involvement.
In patients with invasive breast cancer and a positive SN, histological primary tumor size, the size of SN metastases, and the proportion of involved SNs among all identified SNs were independently predictive of non-SN involvement.
腋窝淋巴结清扫术(ALND)是目前对前哨淋巴结(SN)受累的乳腺癌患者的标准治疗方法。然而,在这些患者中,相当一部分患者的腋窝淋巴结中仅前哨淋巴结受累。在此,我们研究了前哨淋巴结转移患者非前哨淋巴结受累的预测因素,以建立一个预测非前哨淋巴结受累的评分系统。
本研究基于一个前瞻性数据库,该数据库纳入了337例行乳腺癌前哨淋巴结活检的患者,其中81例(24%)前哨淋巴结阳性;我们研究了这81例患者中接受补充性腋窝淋巴结清扫术的71例患者非前哨淋巴结受累的预测因素。根据非前哨淋巴结状态记录并分析所有临床和组织学标准,采用卡方分析、学生t检验和多因素逻辑回归分析。
单因素分析显示,非前哨淋巴结受累与组织学原发肿瘤大小(p = 0.0001)、前哨淋巴结大转移(p = 约0.01)、检测前哨淋巴结转移的方法(苏木精-伊红染色与免疫组化)(p = 0.03)、阳性前哨淋巴结数量(p = 0.049)、所有已识别前哨淋巴结中受累前哨淋巴结的比例(p = 0.0001)以及淋巴管浸润(p = 0.006)之间存在显著关联。多因素分析中,组织学原发肿瘤大小(p = 0.006)、前哨淋巴结大转移(p = 0.02)以及所有已识别前哨淋巴结中受累前哨淋巴结的比例(p = 0.03)仍与非前哨淋巴结状态显著相关。基于多因素分析,我们建立了一个腋窝评分系统(范围0 - 7),以预测前哨淋巴结受累的乳腺癌患者非前哨淋巴结转移的可能性。
在浸润性乳腺癌且前哨淋巴结阳性的患者中,组织学原发肿瘤大小、前哨淋巴结转移大小以及所有已识别前哨淋巴结中受累前哨淋巴结的比例可独立预测非前哨淋巴结受累情况。