Szajewska Hania, Mrukowicz Jacek Z
Department of Paediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition, The Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland.
Paediatr Drugs. 2005;7(2):111-22. doi: 10.2165/00148581-200507020-00004.
Probiotics, defined as microbial cell preparations or components of microbial cells that have a beneficial effect on the health and well being of the host, have traditionally been used to treat and prevent a variety of infections. Beneficial effects of probiotics in acute infectious diarrhea in children seem to be: (i) moderate; (ii) strain-dependent; (iii) dose dependent; (iv) significant in watery diarrhea and viral gastroenteritis, but non-existent in invasive, bacterial diarrhea; and (v) more evident when treatment with probiotics is initiated early in the course of disease. Three large, randomized controlled trials (RCTs) provide evidence of a very modest effect (statistically significant, but of questionable clinical importance) of some probiotic strains (Lactobaccillus GG, Lactobaccillus reuteri, Bifodobacterium lactis) on the prevention of community-acquired diarrhea. We have found conflicting evidence from four RCTs on the efficacy of Lactobacillus GG and B. bifidum and Streptococcus thermophilus in the prevention of nosocomial diarrhea in children. Two RCTs in children provide evidence of a moderate beneficial effect of Lactobacillus GG in the prevention of antibacterial-associated diarrhea (AAD), but results in adults are conflicting. Data on the efficacy of other probiotic strains in AAD in children are very limited. In conclusion, to date, the most extensively studied and best documented clinical application of probiotics in children is for the treatment of acute watery diarrhea of rotaviral or presumably viral etiology. Studies documenting effects in other types of diarrheal diseases in children are limited, although some preliminary results are promising. The effects of different probiotic microorganisms are not equal. Only very few probiotic strains have been tested rigorously in RCTs. Many questions remain to be answered. Future clinical trials should evaluate carefully selected, precisely defined probiotic strains and address clinically important endpoints.
益生菌被定义为对宿主健康有益的微生物细胞制剂或微生物细胞成分,传统上一直用于治疗和预防各种感染。益生菌对儿童急性感染性腹泻的有益作用似乎是:(i)中等程度;(ii)菌株依赖性;(iii)剂量依赖性;(iv)在水样腹泻和病毒性肠胃炎中显著,但在侵袭性细菌性腹泻中不存在;(v)在疾病早期开始使用益生菌治疗时更为明显。三项大型随机对照试验(RCT)提供了证据,表明某些益生菌菌株(嗜酸乳杆菌GG、罗伊氏乳杆菌、双歧杆菌)对预防社区获得性腹泻有非常适度的效果(具有统计学意义,但临床重要性存疑)。我们从四项RCT中发现了关于嗜酸乳杆菌GG、双歧双歧杆菌和嗜热链球菌预防儿童医院内腹泻疗效的相互矛盾的证据。两项针对儿童的RCT提供了证据,表明嗜酸乳杆菌GG在预防抗菌相关性腹泻(AAD)方面有中等程度的有益作用,但成人的结果相互矛盾。关于其他益生菌菌株在儿童AAD中的疗效数据非常有限。总之,迄今为止,益生菌在儿童中研究最广泛、记录最完善的临床应用是治疗轮状病毒或可能由病毒引起的急性水样腹泻。记录益生菌对儿童其他类型腹泻疾病影响的研究有限,尽管一些初步结果很有前景。不同益生菌微生物的作用并不相同。只有极少数益生菌菌株在RCT中经过了严格测试。许多问题仍有待解答。未来的临床试验应评估精心挑选、精确定义的益生菌菌株,并关注具有临床重要性的终点。