相似文献
1
Why clinicians are natural bayesians.
BMJ. 2005 May 7;330(7499):1080-3. doi: 10.1136/bmj.330.7499.1080.
2
Why clinicians are natural bayesians: bayesian confusion.
BMJ. 2005 Jun 11;330(7504):1390; author reply 1390. doi: 10.1136/bmj.330.7504.1390-a.
3
Incorporating uncertainty into medical decision making: an approach to unexpected test results.
Med Decis Making. 2009 Jan-Feb;29(1):116-24. doi: 10.1177/0272989X08323620. Epub 2008 Sep 23.
4
Why clinicians are natural bayesians: clinicians have to be bayesians.
BMJ. 2005 Jun 11;330(7504):1390-1; author reply 1390. doi: 10.1136/bmj.330.7504.1390-c.
5
Cautionary tales in the clinical interpretation of studies of diagnostic tests.
Intern Med J. 2008 Feb;38(2):120-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1445-5994.2007.01436.x. Epub 2007 Jul 23.
6
Youden's index and the weight of evidence.
Methods Inf Med. 2015;54(2):198-9. doi: 10.3414/ME14-04-0003. Epub 2015 Feb 6.
7
Bayes' theorem and the physical examination: probability assessment and diagnostic decision making.
Acad Med. 2011 May;86(5):618-27. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e318212eb00.
8
[[Evaluation of medical diagnostic tests: application of Bayes theorem, ROC-curve and Kappa-test] ].
Orv Hetil. 2000 Jul 30;141(31):1725-8.
9
Issues in the application of Bayes' Theorem to child abuse decision making.
Child Maltreat. 2009 Feb;14(1):114-20. doi: 10.1177/1077559508318395. Epub 2008 May 21.
10
Interpreting the p value.
Chest. 2011 Mar;139(3):723-724. doi: 10.1378/chest.10-2449.
引用本文的文献
1
Developing artificially intelligent agents to support earth independent medical capabilities during human exploration-class space missions.
NPJ Microgravity. 2025 Aug 2;11(1):51. doi: 10.1038/s41526-025-00503-x.
2
Structured Logic: A Philosophical Framework for Diagnostic Imaging Studies.
Cureus. 2025 Jun 29;17(6):e86957. doi: 10.7759/cureus.86957. eCollection 2025 Jun.
3
Utility of a Modified Penlight-Cover Test for Neurolocalization of Lesions Based on Visual Suppression of Nystagmus in Dogs and Cats With Vestibular Disease.
J Vet Intern Med. 2025 Jul-Aug;39(4):e70182. doi: 10.1111/jvim.70182.
4
Machine Listening for OSA Diagnosis: A Bayesian Meta-Analysis.
Chest. 2025 Aug;168(2):520-530. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2025.04.006. Epub 2025 Apr 11.
5
The accuracy of an electronic-Surprise-Question defining end-of-life cohorts in a whole adult population by algorithmic digital risk stratification: the Proactive Risk-Based and Data-Driven Assessment of Patients at the End of Life (PRADA).
EBioMedicine. 2025 May;115:105682. doi: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2025.105682. Epub 2025 Apr 10.
6
Developing an electronic surprise question to predict end-of-life prognosis in a prospective cohort study of acute hospital admissions.
Clin Med (Lond). 2025 Mar;25(2):100292. doi: 10.1016/j.clinme.2025.100292. Epub 2025 Feb 6.
7
Influence of prior probability information on large language model performance in radiological diagnosis.
Jpn J Radiol. 2025 Feb 5. doi: 10.1007/s11604-025-01743-3.
8
Improving event prediction using general practitioner clinical judgement in a digital risk stratification model: a pilot study.
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2024 Dec 18;24(1):382. doi: 10.1186/s12911-024-02797-5.
9
Enhancing therapeutic reasoning: key insights and recommendations for education in prescribing.
BMC Med Educ. 2024 Nov 26;24(1):1360. doi: 10.1186/s12909-024-06310-4.
10
Integrating Deep Learning-Based Dose Distribution Prediction with Bayesian Networks for Decision Support in Radiotherapy for Upper Gastrointestinal Cancer.
Cancer Res Treat. 2025 Jan;57(1):186-197. doi: 10.4143/crt.2024.333. Epub 2024 Aug 2.
本文引用的文献
1
Evaluation of the rapid immunoassay determine HIV 1/2 for detection of antibodies to human immunodeficiency virus types 1 and 2.
J Clin Microbiol. 2003 Aug;41(8):3868-9. doi: 10.1128/JCM.41.8.3868-3869.2003.
2
The rational clinical examination. Does this patient have clubbing?
JAMA. 2001 Jul 18;286(3):341-7. doi: 10.1001/jama.286.3.341.
3
The rational clinical examination. Does this patient have strep throat?
JAMA. 2000 Dec 13;284(22):2912-8. doi: 10.1001/jama.284.22.2912.
4
The rational clinical examination. Does this patient have breast cancer? The screening clinical breast examination: should it be done? How?
JAMA. 1999 Oct 6;282(13):1270-80. doi: 10.1001/jama.282.13.1270.
5
Toward evidence-based medical statistics. 2: The Bayes factor.
Ann Intern Med. 1999 Jun 15;130(12):1005-13. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-130-12-199906150-00019.
6
The rational clinical examination. Does this patient have abdominal aortic aneurysm?
JAMA. 1999 Jan 6;281(1):77-82. doi: 10.1001/jama.281.1.77.
7
Users' guides to the medical literature. III. How to use an article about a diagnostic test. B. What are the results and will they help me in caring for my patients? The Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group.
JAMA. 1994 Mar 2;271(9):703-7. doi: 10.1001/jama.271.9.703.
8
The accuracy of the physical examination in the diagnosis of suspected ascites.
JAMA. 1982 Feb 26;247(8):1164-6.
9
A tool for judging coronary care unit admission appropriateness, valid for both real-time and retrospective use. A time-insensitive predictive instrument (TIPI) for acute cardiac ischemia: a multicenter study.
Med Care. 1991 Jul;29(7):610-27. doi: 10.1097/00005650-199107000-00002.
10
Reliability of stress thallium-201 scanning in the clinical evaluation of coronary artery disease.
Clin Nucl Med. 1979 Jun;4(6):225-8. doi: 10.1097/00003072-197906000-00001.
Zotero 插件