临床医生为何是天生的贝叶斯派。
Why clinicians are natural bayesians.
作者信息
Gill Christopher J, Sabin Lora, Schmid Christopher H
机构信息
Center for International Health and Development, Department of International Health, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, MA 02118, USA.
出版信息
BMJ. 2005 May 7;330(7499):1080-3. doi: 10.1136/bmj.330.7499.1080.
Abstract
Thought you didn't understand bayesian statistics? Read on and find out why doctors are expert in applying the theory, whether they realise it or not
摘要
以为你不懂贝叶斯统计？继续读下去，看看为什么医生们是应用这一理论的专家，不管他们是否意识到这一点。
相似文献
1
Why clinicians are natural bayesians.临床医生为何是天生的贝叶斯派。
BMJ. 2005 May 7;330(7499):1080-3. doi: 10.1136/bmj.330.7499.1080.
2
Why clinicians are natural bayesians: bayesian confusion.为什么临床医生是天生的贝叶斯主义者：贝叶斯困惑。
BMJ. 2005 Jun 11;330(7504):1390; author reply 1390. doi: 10.1136/bmj.330.7504.1390-a.
3
Incorporating uncertainty into medical decision making: an approach to unexpected test results.将不确定性纳入医疗决策：处理意外检测结果的一种方法。
Med Decis Making. 2009 Jan-Feb;29(1):116-24. doi: 10.1177/0272989X08323620. Epub 2008 Sep 23.
4
Why clinicians are natural bayesians: clinicians have to be bayesians.为何临床医生是天生的贝叶斯派：临床医生不得不成为贝叶斯派。
BMJ. 2005 Jun 11;330(7504):1390-1; author reply 1390. doi: 10.1136/bmj.330.7504.1390-c.
5
Cautionary tales in the clinical interpretation of studies of diagnostic tests.诊断试验研究临床解读中的警示故事。
Intern Med J. 2008 Feb;38(2):120-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1445-5994.2007.01436.x. Epub 2007 Jul 23.
6
Youden's index and the weight of evidence.尤登指数与证据权重。
Methods Inf Med. 2015;54(2):198-9. doi: 10.3414/ME14-04-0003. Epub 2015 Feb 6.
7
Bayes' theorem and the physical examination: probability assessment and diagnostic decision making.贝叶斯定理与体格检查：概率评估与诊断决策。
Acad Med. 2011 May;86(5):618-27. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e318212eb00.
8
[[Evaluation of medical diagnostic tests: application of Bayes theorem, ROC-curve and Kappa-test] ].[医学诊断试验的评估：贝叶斯定理、ROC曲线和kappa检验的应用]
Orv Hetil. 2000 Jul 30;141(31):1725-8.
9
Issues in the application of Bayes' Theorem to child abuse decision making.贝叶斯定理在虐待儿童决策应用中的问题。
Child Maltreat. 2009 Feb;14(1):114-20. doi: 10.1177/1077559508318395. Epub 2008 May 21.
10
Interpreting the p value.解读p值。
Chest. 2011 Mar;139(3):723-724. doi: 10.1378/chest.10-2449.
引用本文的文献
1
Developing artificially intelligent agents to support earth independent medical capabilities during human exploration-class space missions.开发人工智能代理，以在人类探索级太空任务中支持地球独立医疗能力。
NPJ Microgravity. 2025 Aug 2;11(1):51. doi: 10.1038/s41526-025-00503-x.
2
Structured Logic: A Philosophical Framework for Diagnostic Imaging Studies.结构化逻辑：诊断成像研究的哲学框架
Cureus. 2025 Jun 29;17(6):e86957. doi: 10.7759/cureus.86957. eCollection 2025 Jun.
3
Utility of a Modified Penlight-Cover Test for Neurolocalization of Lesions Based on Visual Suppression of Nystagmus in Dogs and Cats With Vestibular Disease.基于视觉抑制眼球震颤对患有前庭疾病的犬猫进行病变神经定位的改良笔灯遮盖试验的效用
J Vet Intern Med. 2025 Jul-Aug;39(4):e70182. doi: 10.1111/jvim.70182.
4
Machine Listening for OSA Diagnosis: A Bayesian Meta-Analysis.用于阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停诊断的机器听觉：一项贝叶斯荟萃分析。
Chest. 2025 Aug;168(2):520-530. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2025.04.006. Epub 2025 Apr 11.
5
The accuracy of an electronic-Surprise-Question defining end-of-life cohorts in a whole adult population by algorithmic digital risk stratification: the Proactive Risk-Based and Data-Driven Assessment of Patients at the End of Life (PRADA).通过算法数字风险分层在全成年人口中定义临终队列的电子惊喜问题的准确性：基于风险的主动和数据驱动的临终患者评估（PRADA）。
EBioMedicine. 2025 May;115:105682. doi: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2025.105682. Epub 2025 Apr 10.
6
Developing an electronic surprise question to predict end-of-life prognosis in a prospective cohort study of acute hospital admissions.在一项关于急性医院入院患者的前瞻性队列研究中开发一个电子突发问题以预测临终预后。
Clin Med (Lond). 2025 Mar;25(2):100292. doi: 10.1016/j.clinme.2025.100292. Epub 2025 Feb 6.
7
Influence of prior probability information on large language model performance in radiological diagnosis.先验概率信息对大语言模型在放射诊断中性能的影响。
Jpn J Radiol. 2025 Feb 5. doi: 10.1007/s11604-025-01743-3.
8
Improving event prediction using general practitioner clinical judgement in a digital risk stratification model: a pilot study.在数字风险分层模型中利用全科医生的临床判断改进事件预测：一项试点研究。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2024 Dec 18;24(1):382. doi: 10.1186/s12911-024-02797-5.
9
Enhancing therapeutic reasoning: key insights and recommendations for education in prescribing.强化治疗推理：处方教育的关键见解和建议。
BMC Med Educ. 2024 Nov 26;24(1):1360. doi: 10.1186/s12909-024-06310-4.
10
Integrating Deep Learning-Based Dose Distribution Prediction with Bayesian Networks for Decision Support in Radiotherapy for Upper Gastrointestinal Cancer.将基于深度学习的剂量分布预测与贝叶斯网络相结合用于上消化道癌放疗的决策支持
Cancer Res Treat. 2025 Jan;57(1):186-197. doi: 10.4143/crt.2024.333. Epub 2024 Aug 2.
本文引用的文献
1
Evaluation of the rapid immunoassay determine HIV 1/2 for detection of antibodies to human immunodeficiency virus types 1 and 2.评估用于检测1型和2型人类免疫缺陷病毒抗体的快速免疫测定法检测HIV 1/2。
J Clin Microbiol. 2003 Aug;41(8):3868-9. doi: 10.1128/JCM.41.8.3868-3869.2003.
2
The rational clinical examination. Does this patient have clubbing?临床诊疗的理性思维。该患者有杵状指吗？
JAMA. 2001 Jul 18;286(3):341-7. doi: 10.1001/jama.286.3.341.
3
The rational clinical examination. Does this patient have strep throat?合理的临床检查。该患者患有链球菌性咽炎吗？
JAMA. 2000 Dec 13;284(22):2912-8. doi: 10.1001/jama.284.22.2912.
4
The rational clinical examination. Does this patient have breast cancer? The screening clinical breast examination: should it be done? How?合理的临床检查。该患者患有乳腺癌吗？乳腺筛查临床检查：应该进行吗？如何进行？
JAMA. 1999 Oct 6;282(13):1270-80. doi: 10.1001/jama.282.13.1270.
5
Toward evidence-based medical statistics. 2: The Bayes factor.迈向循证医学统计学。2：贝叶斯因子。
Ann Intern Med. 1999 Jun 15;130(12):1005-13. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-130-12-199906150-00019.
6
The rational clinical examination. Does this patient have abdominal aortic aneurysm?
JAMA. 1999 Jan 6;281(1):77-82. doi: 10.1001/jama.281.1.77.
7
Users' guides to the medical literature. III. How to use an article about a diagnostic test. B. What are the results and will they help me in caring for my patients? The Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group.医学文献用户指南。III. 如何使用一篇关于诊断试验的文章。B. 结果是什么，它们对我照顾患者有帮助吗？循证医学工作组。
JAMA. 1994 Mar 2;271(9):703-7. doi: 10.1001/jama.271.9.703.
8
The accuracy of the physical examination in the diagnosis of suspected ascites.体格检查对疑似腹水诊断的准确性。
JAMA. 1982 Feb 26;247(8):1164-6.
9
A tool for judging coronary care unit admission appropriateness, valid for both real-time and retrospective use. A time-insensitive predictive instrument (TIPI) for acute cardiac ischemia: a multicenter study.一种用于判断冠心病监护病房入院适宜性的工具，适用于实时和回顾性使用。急性心肌缺血的时间不敏感预测工具（TIPI）：一项多中心研究。
Med Care. 1991 Jul;29(7):610-27. doi: 10.1097/00005650-199107000-00002.
10
Reliability of stress thallium-201 scanning in the clinical evaluation of coronary artery disease.
Clin Nucl Med. 1979 Jun;4(6):225-8. doi: 10.1097/00003072-197906000-00001.
Zotero 插件