Suppr超能文献

一种新型瘢痕评估工具——瘢痕与照片匹配评估法(MAPS)的可靠性测试。

Reliability testing of a new scar assessment tool, Matching Assessment of Scars and Photographs (MAPS).

作者信息

Masters Margot, McMahon Margaret, Svens Birgit

机构信息

Department of Occupational Therapy, Royal Adelaide Hospital, North Terrace, Adelaide, Australia.

出版信息

J Burn Care Rehabil. 2005 May-Jun;26(3):273-84.

Abstract

A new scar-assessment tool, the Matching Assessment of Scars and Photographs (MAPS), which uses a set of reference photographs, a numeric scale, and location technique, was tested for its reliability in two stages. First, using five adults, three raters assessed 32 burns scars twice within 3 days. Subsequently, reliability was tested during a 6-month time frame, emphasizing the process of localizing test areas as scars changed and raters forgot the previous assessment. Three raters, from a pool of five, each made three assessments on 29 scars in seven subjects, on average 8 weeks apart. Inter-rater reliability was tested, using Kendall's Tau C and intraclass correlations, respectively, for stages 1 and 2. Agreement was good for border height (0.63-0.70 and 0.78), moderate to good for thickness (0.60-0.74 and 0.81), and good for color (0.55-0.71 and 0.79), whereas for surface it was fair (0.25-0.38 and 0.40). The localization technique was reliable (accuracy within 3 mm) in 93% to 96% of recordings. The MAPS tool is considered ready for clinical use.

摘要

一种新的瘢痕评估工具——瘢痕与照片匹配评估法(MAPS),它使用一组参考照片、数字评分量表和定位技术,分两个阶段对其可靠性进行了测试。首先,让5名成年人参与,3名评估者在3天内对32处烧伤瘢痕进行了两次评估。随后,在6个月的时间范围内对可靠性进行了测试,重点关注随着瘢痕变化以及评估者忘记之前的评估时,测试区域的定位过程。从5名评估者中选出3名,每人对7名受试者的29处瘢痕进行了三次评估,平均间隔8周。分别使用肯德尔tau C系数和组内相关系数对第1阶段和第2阶段的评估者间信度进行了测试。边界高度的一致性良好(0.63 - 0.70和0.78),厚度的一致性为中等至良好(0.60 - 0.74和0.81),颜色的一致性良好(0.55 - 0.71和0.79),而表面的一致性为一般(0.25 - 0.38和0.40)。在93%至96%的记录中,定位技术可靠(精度在3毫米以内)。MAPS工具被认为已可用于临床。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验