Suppr超能文献

更新的就一定更好吗?三代碎石机的比较研究。

Is newer always better? A comparative study of 3 lithotriptor generations.

作者信息

Gerber Rolf, Studer Urs E, Danuser Hansjörg

机构信息

Department of Urology, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.

出版信息

J Urol. 2005 Jun;173(6):2013-6. doi: 10.1097/01.ju.0000158042.41319.c4.

Abstract

PURPOSE

At a single center we compared the efficacy of 3 generations of lithotriptors using identical protocol inclusion and followup criteria but with different modes of anesthesia.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We compared stone disintegration and dilatation of the pyelocaliceal system achieved in a prospective, randomized trial comparing the original HM3 (Dornier Medtech, Kennesaw, Georgia) and Lithostar Plus (LSP) lithotriptors, and a matched, consecutive series of 107 treatments with the Modulith SLX. Stone disintegration and dilatation of the pyelocaliceal system were evaluated by abdominal plain x-ray and renal ultrasonography 1 day and 3 months after treatment.

RESULTS

A total of 82 treatments with the HM3, 75 with the LSP and 107 with the SLX were analyzed, matched for stone burden and location within the pyelocaliceal system. On postoperative day 1, 91%, 65% and 48% patients treated with the HM3, LSP and SLX, respectively, were stone-free or had fragments that were 2 mm or less (HM3 vs LSP p <0.001, HM3 vs SLX p <0.001 and LSP vs SLX p = 0.015). Three to 5 mm fragments were found in 7%, 21% and 35% of patients (p = 0.006, <0.001 and 0.06), and fragments 6 mm or greater were found in 1%, 14% and 15% (p = 0.002, <0.001 and 0.1, respectively). The re-treatment rate was 4% in the HM3 group, 13% in the LSP group and 38% in the SLX group (HM3 vs LSP p = 0.05, HM3 vs SLX p <0.001 and LSP vs SLX p <0.001). Obstructive pyelonephritis occurred in 1% of the HM3 group, 8% of the LSP group and 5% of the SLX group (HM3 vs LSP p = 0.02, HM3 vs SLX p = 0.12 and LSP vs SLX p = 0.4). All re-treatments except those in 5 patients were performed with the HM3. Therefore, the 3-month stone-free rate was comparable in all 3 groups (HM3 87%, LSP 80% and SLX 81%).

CONCLUSIONS

This study indicates that the HM3 lithotriptor disintegrates caliceal and renal pelvic stones better than the LSP and SLX machines, resulting in fewer complications and re-treatments. Disintegration with the LSP machine was also superior to that of the SLX with a need for fewer re-treatments.

摘要

目的

在单一中心,我们采用相同的方案纳入标准和随访标准,但不同的麻醉方式,比较了三代碎石机的疗效。

材料与方法

在一项前瞻性随机试验中,我们比较了最初的HM3(多尼尔医疗技术公司,佐治亚州肯尼索)和Lithostar Plus(LSP)碎石机,以及与Modulith SLX匹配的连续107例治疗病例中肾盂肾盏系统的结石破碎情况和扩张情况。在治疗后1天和3个月,通过腹部平片和肾脏超声评估肾盂肾盏系统的结石破碎情况和扩张情况。

结果

共分析了82例使用HM3治疗的病例、75例使用LSP治疗的病例和107例使用SLX治疗的病例,这些病例在结石负荷和肾盂肾盏系统内的位置上相匹配。术后第1天,使用HM3、LSP和SLX治疗的患者中,分别有91%、65%和48%的患者结石清除或结石碎片小于或等于2mm(HM3与LSP相比,p<0.001;HM3与SLX相比,p<0.001;LSP与SLX相比,p = 0.015)。在7%、21%和35%的患者中发现了3 - 5mm的碎片(p = 0.006、<0.001和0.06),在1%、14%和15%的患者中发现了6mm或更大的碎片(分别为p = 0.002、<0.001和0.1)。HM3组的再次治疗率为4%,LSP组为13%,SLX组为38%(HM3与LSP相比,p = 0.05;HM3与SLX相比,p<0.001;LSP与SLX相比,p<0.001)。HM3组1%的患者发生了梗阻性肾盂肾炎,LSP组为8%,SLX组为5%(HM3与LSP相比,p = 0.02;HM3与SLX相比,p = 0.12;LSP与SLX相比,p = 0.4)。除5例患者外,所有再次治疗均使用HM3进行。因此,所有3组的3个月结石清除率相当(HM3为87%,LSP为80%,SLX为81%)。

结论

本研究表明,HM3碎石机在破碎肾盏和肾盂结石方面优于LSP和SLX机器,并发症和再次治疗较少。LSP机器的结石破碎效果也优于SLX,再次治疗需求较少。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验