Diana Rachel A, Vilberg Kaia L, Reder Lynne M
Department of Psychology, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA 15217, USA.
Brain Res Cogn Brain Res. 2005 Aug;24(3):674-84. doi: 10.1016/j.cogbrainres.2005.04.001.
Previous recognition memory studies have looked for differences in brain activity during recollection- and familiarity-based responding. Although an ERP component correlated with recollection success has been reported, no analogous component related to search initiation has been found. We argue that such a component has not been discovered because studies have compared trials in which participants have made a search attempt and failed (such as Know responses) with those in which the search attempt is successful (such as Remember responses). In the current study, we compared a task that required judgments of lifetime familiarity (differentiating famous from nonfamous names) with one that required judgments of episodic information (deciding whether a name was seen previously in the experiment). By comparing a task on which familiarity judgments were made with no search attempt to a second task in which a search attempt was likely to occur, we identified a component that may reflect the initiation of a memory search. This effect, maximal between 190 and 235 ms, is correlated with Old judgments in the episodic task. Previous ERP findings (e.g., FN400, parietal old/new effect) were also replicated in the present study.
以往的认知记忆研究一直在寻找基于回忆和熟悉度的反应过程中大脑活动的差异。尽管已有报告称存在一个与回忆成功相关的ERP成分,但尚未发现与搜索启动相关的类似成分。我们认为尚未发现这样一个成分是因为研究比较的是参与者进行搜索尝试但失败的试验(如“知道”反应)和搜索尝试成功的试验(如“记得”反应)。在当前研究中,我们将一项需要判断毕生熟悉度(区分名人与非名人名字)的任务与一项需要判断情景信息(判断一个名字是否曾在实验中出现过)的任务进行了比较。通过将一项无需搜索尝试即可做出熟悉度判断的任务与一项可能会进行搜索尝试的第二项任务进行比较,我们识别出了一个可能反映记忆搜索启动的成分。这种效应在190至235毫秒之间最大,与情景任务中的“旧”判断相关。本研究还重复了以往的ERP研究结果(如FN400、顶叶新旧效应)。